Experimental Design by Sun Young CHOO

2024-10-10 19:39:57 UTC

Online learning was difficult to engage in our own experiences

Less engagement and interaction with peers and teachers

Yes of course

2024-10-10 19:40:29 UTC

It can but it shouldn't. We think it depends on the learners. There are certain aspects of face-to-face instruction that online instruction cannot replace.
Definitely. Our first language influences the accent of our second language. And also the process we develop the syntax knowledge.

2024-10-10 19:40:29 UTC

1)No, not all. Because there are things that should be explained online

2) yes

2024-10-10 19:40:51 UTC

No. Possible but can't replace completely/ interaction/ turning on the camera or not/ technical limitations/ some students have bad connections/facilitate but not completely replace→ VR? 2.Definitely yes→ignore the inflection

2024-10-10 20:13:52 UTC

M&S(2023) quasi-experimental design with online group as intervention of study online group was the experimental group and F2F control group-measuring instructional type on proficiency in minority languages

E&S(2010) is different in experimental design because the intervention is the treatment of training of Latin and the groups of English and Chinese native speakers’ learning of Latin was compared

2024-10-10 20:14:39 UTC

First article written by Murphy, OPI pre and Post test, groups of F2F and CMC based learning. Second test is attainment of different levels across LCTLs.

Second article, experimental design with a control group and factorial-based design, participants with diff language backgrounds and tests are different. Control group.