(a) _{What are the three ways of thinking about cultural diversity that the text mentions at the beginning, and what are their characteristics?}

 (b) ^{What alternative way of thinking about cultural diversity does the text put forward, and how is it different from the other three?} 

polyculturalism. The fourth does not see cultures as individuals and they are dynamic, and feels that they can merge, changing gradually over time and in contact.

(c) ^{At this stage, what is your stance towards the four approaches?}

I agree. Cultural origins are diverse, and they have different characteristics. However, in such a society, many media allow them to collide and even merge with each other, which also replaces some bad aspects.

 (a) _{According to the text, what are the consequences of multiculturalism?} 

Multiculturalism is a recipe for the segregation of communities and that it would work against the development of a single set of basic values that could bind members of British society together.

 (b) _{What does the writer seem to think there should be instead of multiculturalism?} 

The author argues that any immigrant should accept The British language and values and be given the right to free elections to parliament.

 (c) ^{What tone does the writer adopt? Does this affect how persuasive the argument is?}

The author adopts an objectionable tone. The author gives several examples to emphasize that cultural diversity deepens the gap between different RACES.

(a) ^{Broadly speaking, does the author advocate or oppose the idea of multiculturalism?} 

Broadly speaking, the author advocate the idea of multiculturalism.

(b) ^{According to the text, what is ‘passive tolerance’ and why is the author positive about this concept?}

‘Passive tolerance’ is the idea that simply living in an area of high diversity rubs off on you, making you more tolerant of ethnic diversity. 

The authors see some of the studies and some of the data that showed that people of different RACES actually more tolerance, if they live in a mixed neighbourhood.

(c) ^{The author uses some research to support her argument. What does this research demonstrate?}

These studies suggest that while people of different RACES may become more tolerant of each other, people may become less trusting of each other, driving them away from each other.

1. ^{What are the advantages of living in a city where there are people from many different cultures?}

Living with people from different cultures can help us learn about different cultures and lifestyles directly and make our minds more tolerant.

 2^{. What problems might such a situation create?} 

Cultural differences are bound to bring about collision and conflict, and cultural differences in life can make each other uncomfortable.

3. ^{What would be the best way of addressing those problems?}

Be tolerant of cultural differences and try to be exposed to different cultures. 

Sometimes an accessible film may not be a good choice. Comparatively speaking, some movies become classics because of its meaning. However, filmmakers can make different movies for different groups of people. Nowadays, there are more and more kinds of movies , so it is much easier for people to contact different kinds of movies. Besides, some film and television software also contains many different films, and the classifications are very clear. In terms of film restrictions, it may be different in some countries. Some countries require the audience’s age, but it seems not very strict in China. Access to some films is in the hands of organizations that review the content of films. Money is a factor, but not the only one. The focus is still on the content of the films.