<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Apex debate pro con by 장수진</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sujin0105/egxlrq4d42n8</link>
      <description>public transportations, cell phones pro con</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-10-15 15:57:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-10-15 16:21:18 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Apex public transportation, cell phone pro con</title>
         <author>sujin0105</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sujin0105/egxlrq4d42n8/wish/292895039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Public transportation pro&nbsp;<br>Hello, my name is Eric, and I'm here to support public transportation is better than private transportation. My opinion is fast and efficient public transportation is needed in these days, especially in dispersed city. In the Pyeong Chang Olympic, now there are lots of people know about Pyeong Chang than before. Also, there is new rail to go to Pyeong Chang. By the railway, lots of people went to Olympic with safe fast ways. Railway made more people to go to Pyeong Chang. Soon, people in Pyeong Chang made lots of money by selling things. Government made new buildings, cultural facilities, amenities. Rail road made Pyeong Chang to better city. Like Pyeong Chang, public transportation is like blood vessel. Public transportation is better than private transportation.<br><br>Public transportation con&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;Hello, my name is Eric, and I'm here to support private transportation is better than public transportation. My opinion is Private transportation is good for low-income households to get a job. Lots of poor people earn money by having food truck, sell foods like fish, Takoyaki, and fruits. Their life will be harder if poor peoples don't have private transportation. To sale without private transportation, they should use more money to borrow place to make market, or make debt to buy a place to make market. Poor people also have a job that needs to move fast in countryside, load heavy things, and needs to go to somewhere&nbsp; that public transportation can't go. By these conditions, I think private transportation is suitable to these conditions. As a result,&nbsp; private transportation is better than public transportation.<br><br>Cell phones pro</div><div>Hello, my name is Eric, and I'm here to support cell phones are harmful. My opinion is students who do not use cell phones get better scores on class learning. If you are studying, do you think playing games with cell phones and studying is good? I think it's not good for studying. If somebody was playing games, it will stay long in somebody's mind and disturb to concentrate on studying. Most people say studying is hard if he or she had been playing cell phones a moment ago. They say they are keep remembering time that playing with cell phones, so it will give bad grades. As a result, cell phones are harmful .</div><div><br></div><div>&nbsp;Cell phones con</div><div>Hello, my name is Eris and I'm here to support cell phones are useful. My opinion is cell phones often promotes junior high school students. In our school, all students in my class do have cell phones, and they make friendships with communicating with kakao-talk and talking about games that they play. In junior high school, almost all students will have cell phones, so they will have more good friendships. In students, there could be cyber ostracize,but it only happens little and students are big enough to stop cyber ostracize. As a result, cell phones are useful.</div><div><br><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-15 15:50:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sujin0105/egxlrq4d42n8/wish/292895039</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
