<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Triangulation in research (Session 4, 2022) by Learning Design at UTS</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-04-27 06:46:24 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-02-08 15:14:40 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Triangulation in Research - Jason O&#39;Connell</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2252400285</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><sub>Now that you have collected both content analysis and interview data, what are some of the limitations that you are finding in your findings?<br><br></sub></strong><sup>The limitations would be the depth, this has been a really good subject, especially regarding the analysis of qualitative data. I will use the techniques learned here in the future, just some more time is required in completing the research on behalf of an organization in a live situation which this subject gives you the tools to do.<br></sup><br><strong><sup>What are some benefits of considering both the content analysis and the interview findings together?<br></sup></strong><sub>I think the benefits would be just as discussed in week 4, the triangulation of the results in the confirmation of them. Really beneficial in developing the research report as you look for whether they&nbsp; converge, are complementary, or diverge.</sub><br><br><strong><sup>Of the two methods that you have conducted, which one provided the most useful findings for understanding audience engagement? Why?</sup></strong><br><sub>I don't think that one was better than the other. In tandem, they both worked together to answer and confirm research findings. </sub><br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-07-31 22:03:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2252400285</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Good responses here Jason</title>
         <author>kay_donovan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2253357408</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In hindsight, what might you have done in the data collection/analysis to generate deeper findings?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-02 09:44:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2253357408</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Triangulation</title>
         <author>evonnecollier</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2257121924</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The key limitations were:<br>1) access to KI who had credentials or experience in the research problem;<br>2) depth of research (low number of respondents)<br><br>The content analysis provided the insight into the research aim in a more quantitative form and the interview findings provided the qual data to provide meaning to the research.<br><br>Both are critical methods to understanding how to engage audiences however I did really enjoy developing a more quantitative position via the social media content analysis.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-09 03:02:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/eetfu0aeyncvj3fq/wish/2257121924</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
