<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Argument or fight? by Georgia Caver</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd</link>
      <description>Please click pink &quot;start&quot; button in bottom right of screen and then add your example and explanation to our wall :)
In Chapter 2 of his textbook, Heinrichs discusses the difference between argument and fight and provides some examples.  Your task here: locate and copy a passage of public discourse (it can be video or written), share that passage, tell us whether it&#39;s argument or fight, and explain why/how you came to that conclusion. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-06-30 23:38:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-07-08 03:11:40 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQC0nz0t9F4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269177476</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Here is a video of the presidential debate between Obama and Romney. Do not worry the video only highlights specific arguments rather than showing the whole debate!<br><br>This video of public discourse is an argument, and here's why. "You succeed in an argument when you persuade your audience. You win a fight when you dominate the enemy" (Heinrichs, 2017, p16, para. 3). &nbsp;<br><br>The gentlemen in the video never attack each other. Yes, sometimes they look at the other while speaking, but they are always trying to persuade those who are watching the debate rather than fighting over whose policies are right. The very first main point by Romney is a perfect example of this. He speaks directly to the camera saying "taxing more regulating more if you will trickled down government [he] thought it would work. That is not the right answer for America." He is trying to persuade the audience (viewers) rather than attacking Obama about his current policies. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-07-02 16:46:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269177476</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269483084</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The title states that this video is a debate, however, I believe it is more of an fight than a debate and or argument. They are not trying to persuade each other. They are trying to prove the other wrong directly without any rhetorical appeals. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cmBXUyARKI" />
         <pubDate>2018-07-05 14:44:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269483084</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269638411</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Logan Dowell -                                                 This is a debate, the cross-examination portion between William Lane Craig, a famous Christian apologist, and one of the leading atheistic authors of the time. Both the format and the stature of the opponents is conducive to an intelligent and thorough debate - to watch the debate in its entirety is a different experience as it is more of a traditional debate format wherein both speakers are given time slots back to back to emphasize their points. This is the most raucous portion of the debate. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://youtu.be/DPBVUT1NlKA" />
         <pubDate>2018-07-08 02:54:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/gcaver/ec2jinriy9rd/wish/269638411</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
