<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>PA: CASE STUDY MABE´S RETAILER by HITLER RAUL PEREZ TTITO</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x</link>
      <description>GROUP 4</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-08-22 14:49:27 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-08-25 22:33:13 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>PA: CASE STUDY MABE´S RETAILER </title>
         <author>000346071</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554313089</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Full Name</strong></p><p><br></p><p>Participation / Contribution</p><p><strong>Hitler Raúl Pérez Ttito        100%</strong></p><p>Introduction &amp; Causes of Failure</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><p><br></p><p>Supply chain resilience is a critical factor for companies that operate in globalized markets. MABE Retailers, a multinational company with a wide portfolio including electronics, clothing, and household goods, faced a major disruption due to its reliance on a single overseas supplier located in a disaster‑prone region. The event underscores the importance of supplier diversification, proactive risk assessment, and effective communication strategies in international operations (Sheffi, 2020; Ivanov &amp; Dolgui, 2020).</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Causes of the Failure</strong></p><p><br></p><p>MABE’s supply chain collapse was triggered by several weaknesses: (1) over‑reliance on a single supplier (single point of failure), (2) lack of supplier diversification, (3) limited risk assessment for natural hazards, and (4) ineffective communication with the overseas partner (Ivanov &amp; Dolgui, 2020).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-25 19:35:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554313089</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>References (APA 7th edition)</title>
         <author>000346071</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554393790</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Full Name</strong></p><p><br></p><p>Participation / Contribution</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Hitler Raúl Pérez Ttito        100%</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>References (APA 7th Edition)</strong></p><p><br></p><p>Govindan, K., Mina, H., &amp; Alavi, B. (2023). Designing supply chain strategies against epidemic disruptions. <em>Decision Sciences</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12609">https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12609</a></p><p>Ivanov, D. (2023). Toward supply chain viability theory: From lessons learned to principles for managing disruption risks. <em>International Journal of Production Research</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2177049">https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2177049</a></p><p>Ivanov, D., &amp; Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles toward survivability—A position paper motivated by COVID‑19 outbreak. <em>International Journal of Production Research</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727">https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727</a></p><p>Lin, Y., Zhang, A., &amp; Ji, X. (2021). The effects of supply chain diversification during the COVID‑19 pandemic. <em>Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1366554521002556">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1366554521002556</a></p><p>Pellegrino, R., Costantino, F., &amp; Tauro, D. (2022). COVID‑19 pandemic: Supply chain risk management by mitigation strategies. <em>IFAC‑PapersOnLine, 55</em>(10), 1307–1312. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.489">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.489</a></p><p>Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., &amp; Wamba, S. F. (2021). A structured literature review on the interplay between resilience, disruption, and performance in the supply chain context. <em>Annals of Operations Research</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8243624/">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8243624/</a></p><p>Sheffi, Y. (2020). <em>The New (Ab)Normal: Reshaping business and supply chain strategy beyond COVID‑19</em>. MIT CTL. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://sheffi.mit.edu/book/new-abnormal">https://sheffi.mit.edu/book/new-abnormal</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-25 21:13:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554393790</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Consuelo Raquel Villaverde Aguirre  100% participación </title>
         <author>000345658</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554398009</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>“MABE Retailers – Supply Chain Disruption”</strong></p><p><strong>Impact of the Disruption</strong></p><p>-<strong> Operational Impact:</strong> halts in production, limited factory capacity, shipment delays.<br>- <strong>Financial Impact:</strong> emergency sourcing at higher costs, use of expensive air freight, penalties for late fulfillment.<br>- <strong>Customer Impact</strong>: dissatisfaction, cancellations, and loss of trust.<br>- <strong>Strategic Impact: </strong>reduction in market share and competitive disadvantage compared to rivals with stronger resilience.</p><p><strong>“Diversification and proactive risk management are key to supply chain resilience.”</strong></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-25 21:22:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554398009</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RONAL CUNO PIZARRO </title>
         <author>000345760</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554424705</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mitigation Strategies </strong></p><p>Based on risk management best practices, four strategies should have been applied:<br>1. Risk Avoidance – avoiding single-source dependency by selecting suppliers in safer regions.<br>2. Risk Reduction – diversifying suppliers, maintaining safety stock, and conducting periodic audits.<br>3. Risk Transfer – using insurance policies and outsourcing logistics to transfer part of the risk.<br>4. Risk Acceptance – tolerating minor delays if the cost of prevention is higher.<br>5. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM): building long-term relationships with key suppliers through flexible contracts, collaboration programs, and shared incentives, ensuring mutual commitment and responsiveness during emergencies.<br>Additionally, implementing digital communication tools (ERP, AI monitoring, blockchain for traceability) would strengthen responsiveness and visibility in the supply chain.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Lessons Learned</strong></p><p>From this case, several lessons emerge for companies worldwide:<br>- Resilience over short-term efficiency: focusing only on cost savings creates vulnerabilities.<br>- Diversification is mandatory: relying on multiple suppliers across regions ensures continuity.<br>- Technology as an ally: advanced analytics, AI, and real-time monitoring systems are key for modern risk management.<br>- Communication and active listening: fostering transparent dialogue with suppliers allows faster decision-making and builds trust.</p><p>- Continuous adaptability: supply chains must regularly update contingency plans and reassess risks, since scenarios evolve due to factors such as geopolitics, inflation, pandemics, and new technologies.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-25 22:14:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554424705</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CONCLUSION</title>
         <author>000345760</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554425346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Conclusion</p><p>The case of MABE Retailers demonstrates that supply chain disruptions have multidimensional impacts: operational, financial, customer-related, and strategic. Companies must adopt a proactive approach, combining supplier diversification, technology, and strong communication practices. By integrating resilience and sustainability into their supply chain strategies, organizations can not only minimize risks but also strengthen long-term competitiveness in international markets.</p><p>Moreover, this case highlights that resilience should not be seen as a cost but as a strategic investment: companies that anticipate risks and reinforce their supply chains can better protect their reputation, competitiveness, and customer trust in the long run.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-25 22:15:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/000346071/e8aom1cl9xw9d75x/wish/3554425346</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
