<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>W5Q1: The Wannsee Conference by Kimberly Hall</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hallk21/e7ngh7qhwfgw</link>
      <description> Many widely read accounts of the Wannsee Conference claim that it was where the Nazis decided to murder the Jews of Europe. Historians disagree, pointing to evidence that the decision had been made before the meeting at Wannsee. Why, then, was the meeting significant? (11 points)</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-11-25 13:38:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-12-04 22:59:58 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Wannsee Conference</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hallk21/e7ngh7qhwfgw/wish/310710230</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the first paragraph of the reading it states that historians felt as though this conference wasn't when the decision to 🤬 the Jews of Europe was made, but instead it was for all of the other German Leaders to figure out the necessary details and steps that needed to be carried out in order to achieve Hitler's order. Also, later in the reading, another reason the Wannsee Conference was held was to help "... establish the central role the SS would play..." (FHO, 485). So it was more of a meeting to review and revise roles and responsibilities then a meeting to enact a decision.<br><br>Rob Smart</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-04 01:17:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hallk21/e7ngh7qhwfgw/wish/310710230</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
