<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Held and Hein  by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/panze_h_04/e5d4fwhmmge6</link>
      <description>Held and Hein, by showing that a change in the experience of the cats had a large impact on their visual development, supported a nurture view of the development of perception. 
Write three pieces of evidence from the study which support this claim.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-10-31 04:44:39 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2016-10-31 13:45:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sophie Young</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/panze_h_04/e5d4fwhmmge6/wish/134210357</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>One piece of evidence to support this claim is that as self-produced movement, which is an innate behaviour (therefore supporting the nature view), was deprived of in the kittens, therefore saying the results of this study are based on nurture.<br>A second piece of evidence to support this is that as the kittens were reared in/ exposed to lightless conditions, this was a change in their everyday experience, which means that they had ot adapt their visual stimulation to their surroundings.&nbsp;<br>A third and final piece of evidence from the study that makes it corroborate with the nurture point of view, is that Sutherland (1959) suggested that any habits learned through the period of deprivation of self produced movement will compete with or inhibit the natural, innate response.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-31 13:29:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/panze_h_04/e5d4fwhmmge6/wish/134210357</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
