https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS PER GROUP en-us 2022-05-12 05:04:11 UTC 2022-07-22 16:57:12 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f9d0.png julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180852178 The Group 4 researchers used purposive sampling on their study to know who will be their participants. Since their topic is about peer pressure, selecting purposively will help them to determine who are the participants that can provide an in-depth and detailed information about the issue.]]> 2022-05-12 08:10:59 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180852178 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180866897  I personally think that the weakness of group 4 is their presentation of data gathering procedures. The presenters could have included if they had conducted an observation (which is necessary) while they interviewed their participants. In this section, they could have also included the errors or weaknesses they encountered and how they solved them during their study. ]]> 2022-05-12 08:22:12 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180866897 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180893935  Data analysis is the weakness of Group 5. Aside from not explaining thoroughly their data analysis, they have not even stated what and whose method of data analysis they have used (ex. Moustakas modified van Kaam method of data analysis, etc.)  ]]> 2022-05-12 08:43:33 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180893935 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180929210  I believe Group 5 researchers successfully followed their research design—the strategy they used to integrate the different components of the study. They provided the blueprint for the collection, measurement, and analysis of data. They even cited a study to prove theirs. However, they failed to effectively address one research problem: the context of the lived experiences regarding depression and anxiety of grade 11 STEM students at New Era University amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. ]]> 2022-05-12 09:10:45 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2180929210 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2182591846 I liked how they presented the Data Analysis utilizing a Graphic Organizer since it was visually appealing.


]]> 2022-05-13 08:49:08 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2182591846 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183783410 The researchers in this part could have had a more detailed explanation about the background of the study.]]> 2022-05-14 11:06:52 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183783410 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183867506 The strength of Group 1 is the use of purposive sampling. Since not all New Era University students live abroad, a random sampling would not provide them with necessary and relevant information for their study. ]]> 2022-05-14 13:55:50 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183867506 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183868101 I believe Group 1 would have had a stronger case if they added observation in their data gathering procedures. Observing is a crucial part of gathering data as it provides deeper information.]]> 2022-05-14 13:56:55 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183868101 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183868753 Group 2 outdid themselves in terms of their Data Analysis. They have followed their chosen method’s procedures in analyzing the data religiously which in turn provided them with a smooth flow in creating their analysis that was reflected in their study.]]> 2022-05-14 13:57:57 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183868753 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183869241 The Group 2 lacked details about their RRLs in their presentation. A brief outline of each RRL would have added an impact to their presentation. Aside from that, additional RRLs would help in strengthening their argument.]]> 2022-05-14 13:58:41 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183869241 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183869753 I believe Group 4’s strength is their review of related literature. Each of the stated articles are relevant and are in line with their topic. It provided them with tons of information and it is overall reflected throughout their study.]]> 2022-05-14 13:59:32 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183869753 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183870125 Observing the participants and receiving arts-based data with the interviews are crucial to achieve triangulation which is why I believe that the Group 4 lacked in terms of their Sources of Data. They could have gotten more information if they have thought of more sources to achieve relevant and in-depth information.]]> 2022-05-14 14:00:07 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183870125 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183872168 I believe the Group 5’s Theoretical Framework built a strong case for their study. The theory is relevant and informative which is a good foundation for their research.]]> 2022-05-14 14:03:41 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183872168 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183872789 Group 5 researchers weren’t able to answer their research question regarding the context of the lived experiences of their participants. The answer they had is about the impact and not about the background of the said phenomenon.]]> 2022-05-14 14:04:46 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2183872789 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185544950 Group 1 gained their strength through their sampling methods. Purposive sampling helped them determine who the foreign students were that could give them the information they needed to fulfill their studies.  ]]> 2022-05-16 11:39:42 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185544950 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185558378  Inside Group 1 research design, they mentioned the independent and dependent variables, which is a method in quantitative research. That became their weakness since their research is a hermeneutic approach and qualitative research. ]]> 2022-05-16 11:51:21 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185558378 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185569023 One of the strength that this group has is their sampling. Since their respondents need to be from abroad, purposive sampling is a great way for them to choose the proper respondents with regards to their topic as well.]]> 2022-05-16 11:59:23 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185569023 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185571298 Outdated citations ]]> 2022-05-16 12:01:23 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185571298 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185574427 The weakness of this group is that in their research design, they have included variables which is not present in a qualitative research. Which is the reason why it is contradicting to the type of research that they have executed. ]]> 2022-05-16 12:04:07 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185574427 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185575000 Data analysis was well explained and well presented.]]> 2022-05-16 12:04:29 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185575000 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185587250 I believe that Group 2's background of the study is one of their major strengths in their research. The reason for this is that it truly explains as to what this study is all about and what are the roots of the topic that they have chosen.]]> 2022-05-16 12:13:32 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185587250 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185589503 Even though their related literatures are connected and well-developed, the group could've tried to add more related literature in order to strengthen the foundations of the topic that they have chosen to do a research on.]]> 2022-05-16 12:15:13 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185589503 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185591350  I believe Group 2 failed to provide a quality of work since they are lacking in their data gathering procedure. They could have used the observation and arts-based data to support their study. An interview alone is not enough to prove that their results are reliable. ]]> 2022-05-16 12:16:27 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185591350 julialomugdang https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185603313  Group 2 successfully followed their data analysis. They described, identified, and interpreted key patterns of the English-speaking anxiety phenomenon. ]]> 2022-05-16 12:23:50 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185603313 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185607785 Almost everyone in the group was talking about their research topic. The presentation was really comprehensive, and each piece of information that was presented was easy to understand. They described the entire issue in the introduction, offering the audience insight into their study.]]> 2022-05-16 12:26:59 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185607785 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185610050 I believe their strength is their sampling. Once again, purposive sampling is a great way for researchers to find respondents with specific requirements with regards to the topic chosen by the researchers. ]]> 2022-05-16 12:28:24 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185610050 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185612477 Group 2 did well in explaining how they analyzed their data and they meticulously followed Moustaka's procedure]]> 2022-05-16 12:30:04 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185612477 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185614564 In my opinion, the weakness of Group 4 is their data gathering procedure. In conducting a qualitative research, observation is also needed in order to fully understand the lived experience of their respective respondents. By doing so, researchers are able to gather more data that can help their study, the society, and future researchers as well]]> 2022-05-16 12:31:24 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185614564 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185620550 Personally, the purpose of the study of Group 5 is one of their major strong points. This is due to the fact that mental health is an issue that is arising nowadays. Understanding the well-being of others is an essential thing to do, because by doing this, we are helping others to cope up with their own mental health as well.]]> 2022-05-16 12:35:37 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185620550 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185624986 I have observed that in their scope and limitations, they did not include the section of the Grade 11 STEM students, as well as the school year that these students were studying in. Overall, their scope and limitations is already well-developed but this is is just one thing I have observed with regards to their research.]]> 2022-05-16 12:38:28 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185624986 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185625660 Their group's weakness is that several specific aspects of their study were not properly explained, and some slides missed the broad information that it believed it required, in my opinion.]]> 2022-05-16 12:38:53 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185625660 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185628645 Group 2 is a bit lacking in their RRLs.]]> 2022-05-16 12:40:40 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185628645 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185631316 Group 4 provided a well explained overview of their participants.]]> 2022-05-16 12:42:25 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185631316 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185637522 Their explanation of how these people would benefit from the study was insufficient]]> 2022-05-16 12:46:18 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185637522 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185643353 It seems as though their participants are too few to collect enough data for their study.]]> 2022-05-16 12:50:01 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185643353 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185646602 Their scope and limitations were well explained.]]> 2022-05-16 12:52:00 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185646602 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185688676 I saw throughout their presentation that they did not depict their art-based very well, which I believe is why it falls short in my perspective.]]> 2022-05-16 13:17:04 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185688676 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185765626 The Data Gathering presentation by Group 5 was excellent, and the speaker assigned to this section of the presentation did an excellent job explaining it.]]> 2022-05-16 13:58:54 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185765626 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185836158 This group's strength is that they have information from the students that includes the relevance, quality, and completeness of the data acquired by the researchers.]]> 2022-05-16 14:35:45 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185836158 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185838641 The problem in this group is that I believe there is a lack of data in the research design, which doesn't support much and is also somewhat counterintuitive to the type of research presented in this slide.]]> 2022-05-16 14:37:01 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185838641 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185858879 One problem that I saw in this particular slide is that they did not address the concern presented in this slide about the ongoing pandemic from the students. It should have been stated so that the research design makes more sense. Perhaps they need more time to examine the information, evaluate it, and recognize the setting.]]> 2022-05-16 14:47:19 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185858879 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185859612 Now, I believe they did a fantastic job explaining how they accomplished it, what they did to have the students open up about their issues about their problems on this slide where they talk about the selected five individuals in 11-STEM. This is one of those days when you can get really lucky by questioning the proper individuals about issues that truly need to be examined.]]> 2022-05-16 14:47:45 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185859612 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185861714 The significance of the study is the shortcoming I identified in their presentation. They didn't give a good definition to back it up. Furthermore, they were solely reading the content of the presentation.]]> 2022-05-16 14:48:46 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185861714 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869558 The introduction felt fantastic, the speakers were active and clear, and I believe their topic, objective, and research questions are relevant to the current situation, thus they did a fantastic job.]]> 2022-05-16 14:52:51 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869558 joshuadoyogan https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869600 I observed that they offered their attendees a really extensive explanation and introduction of their backgrounds throughout the presentation, which was quite pleasant to see.]]> 2022-05-16 14:52:52 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869600 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869929 The study design is a little low-quality, and they maybe lacked in some areas of the research, but I think the approach was okay as they were going through the research design.]]> 2022-05-16 14:53:03 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185869929 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185884375 Group 4's weakness, in my opinion, is their description of data collection processes. If the presenters had conducted an observation which is required when interviewing their subjects, they could have included it. They could have additionally described the mistakes or limitations they encountered and also how they addressed them during their study in this section.]]> 2022-05-16 15:00:43 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185884375 https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185885037 In this presentation, they explained how they use purposive sampling to discover specific people and  details needed for their topic. It must be related to the topic, so if they use this form of sample, it will be easy for them to interview; great work from them.]]> 2022-05-16 15:01:04 UTC https://padlet.com/julialomugdang/e4y9ixjwddfjr04g/wish/2185885037