<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Does Shakespeare ultimately come out for or against colonialism in The Tempest?  by BLESSY KALARANI J</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0</link>
      <description>Made with eyes on the prize</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-09-08 05:22:05 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-09-07 10:50:55 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>VISHMASHRI                                                                                The images of Prospero and Caliban are a reflection of the colonial context and the relationship between the deprived colonial subject and the European colonizer, from Prospero&#39;s power actions to Caliban&#39;s protest. The reflection of the colonial context lies in Prospero&#39;s tough treatment of Caliban, in his intentions and colonial ideals, and in the image of an oppressed native who is compelled to obey the colonialist but does not see this as a blessing. Thus, the interpretation of the play as a postcolonial text is possible through the example of Prospero&#39;s indulgent attitude towards Caliban as a stupid animal that needs to be taught, as well as how Caliban counteracts Prospero&#39;s attempts to teach him his language, reflecting the resistance of the dispossessed colonial subject to the power colonialist. The main element of the “The Tempest”, which forms the plot, is the Duke of Prospero, a colonizing island. He has the power and magical abilities, with which he achieves his justice to others. Prospero comes to the island of Sycorax and subjugates people to himself, which reflects his image of the colonizer in the play. The sense of superiority Prospero gives him the right to usurp the island and its inhabitants, displacing Caliban&#39;s mother and making him his slave on the basis of European colonialist views of dehumanized indigenous peoples and the need to control them. Thus, Prospero regards Caliban as an inferior person over whom he has the right to dominate and change Caliban&#39;s ignorance, and the latter, in turn, defends the right to own his land and opposes domination</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2233391903</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-06-29 12:49:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2233391903</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>29-09-22</title>
         <author>miruthullavaani01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2233512485</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does Shakespeare ultimately come out for or against colonialism in The Tempest?<br><br>The Tempest has often been interpreted as a play about colonialism primarily because Prospero comes to Sycorax's island, subdues her, rules the land and imposes his own culture on the people of the land. In this interpretation, Prospero is not seen primarily as a kind father of Miranda and kind ruler instead usurping Caliban's Island from him (Caliban). But putting him under slavery and undermining him as a monster, we can take Prospero as a representative of the Europeans who usurped the land of native Americans and enslaved them. He, as a sense of superiority, takes Caliban as half man.&nbsp; Pushing the native to the side, he places himself at the helm of affairs. He displaces Caliban's mother and treats her as a beast. He has full control over everything on the island. He makes Caliban work as his servant and calls him a thing of darkness. Caliban is being dehumanized or treated as subhuman. Like European fantasizes the other people as a wild man, Prospero, in this play, describes Caliban as deformed, evil smiling, treacherous, drunkard, violent, savage, and devil worshipping etc. According to Prospero, he is not even human rather born devil.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-06-29 15:43:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2233512485</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>KAVYA 29.6.22</title>
         <author>kavya01</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2234264806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<h1>Does Shakespeare ultimately come out for or against colonialism in The Tempest?</h1><div><br>During the time when <em>The Tempest</em> was written and first performed, both Shakespeare and his audiences would have been very interested in the efforts of English and other European settlers to colonize distant lands around the globe. <em>The Tempest</em> explores the complex and problematic relationship between the European colonizer and the native colonized peoples through the relationship between Prospero and Caliban. Prospero views Caliban as a lesser being than himself. As such, Prospero believes that Caliban should be grateful to him for educating Caliban and lifting him out of "savagery." It simply does not occur to Prospero that he has stolen rulership of the island from Caliban, because Prospero can't imagine Caliban as being fit to rule anything. In contrast, Caliban soon realizes that Prospero views him as a second-class citizen fit only to serve and that by giving up his rulership of the island in return for his education, he has allowed himself to be robbed. As a result, Caliban turns bitter and violent, which only reinforces Prospero's view of him as a "savage." Shakespeare uses Prospero and Caliban's relationship to show how the misunderstandings between the colonizer and the colonized lead to hatred and conflict, with each side thinking that the other is at fault.<br><br></div><div>In addition to the relationship between the colonizer and colonized, <em>The Tempest</em> also explores the fears and opportunities that colonization creates. Exposure to new and different peoples leads to racism and intolerance, as seen when <a href="https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-tempest/characters/sebastian"><strong>Sebastian</strong></a> criticizes <a href="https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-tempest/characters"><strong>Alonso</strong></a> for allowing his daughter to marry an African. Exploration and colonization led directly to slavery and the conquering of native peoples. For instance, Stephano and Trinculo both consider capturing Caliban to sell as a curiosity back at home, while Stephano eventually begins to see himself as a potential king of the island. At the same time, the expanded territories established by colonization created new places in which to experiment with alternative societies. Shakespeare conveys this idea in Gonzalo's musings about the perfect civilization he would establish if he could acquire a territory of his own.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-06-30 12:28:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2234264806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SHRIYAA (07-09-22)</title>
         <author>shririsi2005</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2286206683</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It is in this context that Shakespeare wrote his five-act play around 1610: The Tempest. We feel in his play an influence of this colonial society that can be seen in two different ways. Thus,<strong> Shakespeare in Act 1 and Act 2 of his play The Tempest does not criticize colonialism</strong> in a very clear way but treats it ambiguously</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://thedailynewnation.com/library/1524756178_5.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2022-09-07 10:50:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/blessykalarani/e22hx2zx9apdwyi0/wish/2286206683</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
