<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>MAEC USA REPORT  by Ng Wan Zhen</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw</link>
      <description>DONALD TRUMP WANTS TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-12-24 05:49:24 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-04-24 10:09:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Article 1</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760174</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel this article quite good sia like cover almost all the topics we learn </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-economy-approaches-years-end-on-lackluster-note-1482443311" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 06:34:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760174</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Additional article</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760563</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Not worthy to be main but i think got some useful info like the optimism of like some Canadian executives towards the US economy growth because of Donald trump</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.bnn.ca/83-of-canadian-execs-say-trump-will-lift-u-s-economy-but-half-doubt-the-best-days-are-ahead-1.633431" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 07:20:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760563</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Another one i found</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760721</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Another comment about Donald trump's impact on the economy i find it a bit chim to read @xiaokid help me read see if it can be a main article we can use thx</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/adam-creighton/donald-trumpfed-optimisim-about-us-economy-misplaced/news-story/2c9bbc18f613be0d42a5beffd051601d" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 07:38:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760721</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Additional article</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760939</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.businessinsider.sg/trumps-election-causing-extreme-swings-in-us-economy-2016-12/?r=US&amp;IR=T#YDZ1yHLS1pLwwPTb.97" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 08:00:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144760939</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Contingency/ extra article</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144765466</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.businessinsider.sg/trump-trade-policy-lead-to-global-recession-2016-12/?r=US&amp;IR=T#AbtAj8eGJh5IFZL8.97" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 13:51:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144765466</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Another one mind me man so many articles</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144765499</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.livetradingnews.com/good-news-us-economy-growing-bad-news-slowly-24082.html#.WF59q-Z97IU" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 13:53:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144765499</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Another one</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766258</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.fxstreet.com/news/outlook-for-us-economy-in-2017-nomura-201612182355" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 14:53:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766258</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Article 2</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766411</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/28/donald-trump-economic-consequences-us-election-growth" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 15:03:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766411</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766572</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Article 3 (reference</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/12/20/why-china-matters-trumps-economic-policy/95487918/" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-24 15:14:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144766572</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Analysis for Article 1 - Summary</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144890733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>+ve:<br>-&gt;Stock prices soar since Nov election<br>-&gt;Household spending - 0.2% in Nov<br>==&gt;Slowdown from Aug and Oct<br>-&gt;Steady job creation<br>-&gt;Increase employment in commercial, health-care &amp; hospital sectors<br><br>-ve:<br>-&gt;Income growth - flatlined (not much change)<br>==&gt;Wage &amp; Salary income - rose 3.5% in Nov from Oct (Slowest year-over-year gain since Dec 2013 despite 3.5% annual pace in 3rd quarter - the best quarterly increase in 2 years)<br>-&gt;Consumer spending<br>==&gt;Domestic: 2/3 of Total US output<br>==&gt; Demand: Soft (for factory-made goods)<br>==&gt;Smaller share of adults holding jobs = Smaller employment rate<br>==&gt;Increased housing &amp; health-care expenses = spend less<br>-&gt;Price inflation<br>-&gt;Measured by personal-consumption expenditures index (can copy graph)<br>==&gt;Rose by 1.4% from Nov 2015 = reflected stabilizing energy prices &amp; firmer consumer demand that allows businesses to pass = Raise benchmark interest rate along price increases - support Fed's move<br>==&gt;BUT inflation readings now are below central bank's 2% target<br>==&gt;Could be temporary such as gasoline &amp; oil costs which slumped in Nov but rebounded in Dec due to oil-producing countries agreeing to cut production<br>-&gt;Meager economic output<br>==&gt;Mining exploration, shafts &amp; wells doubled from mid-2009 to end of 2014 = high oil prices &amp; new technologies that spur investment<br>==&gt;Fell by 2/3 since that point, dragged down output<br>-&gt;Strength of US dollar<br>==&gt;Challenge to manufacturers seeking to sell products into foreign markets (orders for long-lasting durable goods are down slightly in 2016 compared with 2015 despite overall economic growth)<br><br>Measure to counter:<br>-&gt;DT's election of tax cuts &amp; deregulation<br>==&gt;Possibility of boosting businesses, consumers &amp; economic growth (tbc - implementation, response of businesses &amp; households)<br>==&gt;Currently have some optimism being developed<br>-&gt;Relatively conservative planning on market outcomes &amp; aggression on restricting costs<br><br><br>Overall:<br>-Measure of economic vitality are income growth, consumer spending &amp; inflation<br>-Growing rate at 1.7% in Oct, Nov &amp; Dec 2016 (expects 1.9% growth in 2016 &amp; 2.1% in 2017)<br>-Uncertain global economy</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-30 05:45:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144890733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Analysis for Article 2 - Summary</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144894733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>+ve:<br>-&gt;US growth most likely accelerate above 2.2% average annual rate<br>==&gt;With a Republican president &amp; party, public spending will be boosted &amp; debt limits relaxed<br>==&gt;Therefore, DT can implement the Keynesian fiscal stimulus<br>-&gt;Sensible Tax reforms will become law<br>Eg. Amnesty for multinational companies that repatriate foreign profits<br>==&gt;Dominance of Republicans = easy agreement on tax cuts financed mainly by higher public borrowing (consumer spending) = bigger budget deficits = stimulate more growth &amp; inflation<br>*as compared to special interest lobbies' resistance to the elimination of exemptions &amp; loopholes<br>-&gt;Deregulation boost economic growth<br>==&gt;Reversing bank regulations = banks encouraged to loosen lending standards (esp middle income households) = upswing in residential construction &amp; debt financed consumption = add further growth more quickly<br>==&gt;Excessive deregulation = re-run of 2007 financial crisis (future problem)<br>-&gt;Good geopolitical stability in the short term<br>==&gt;Preference for transactional realpolitik over liberal interventionism stabilise relations with Russia &amp; China (spheres of influence) - Russia: Free rein in Ukraine &amp; Syria in exchange for restraint in central Europe and the Baltics, China: accepted inevitable dominance in Asia if it avoids outright wars with Japan, Taiwan &amp; other countries whose security is guaranteed by treaties with the US = Restore a degree of stability at the cost of human rights<br>-&gt;Force Americans to recognise flaws in their own democracy<br>==&gt;Reenergise efforts to reform the electoral college<br>==&gt;Encourage voters to elect legislatures to counteract federal conservatism with progressive state laws on issues ranging from air quality &amp; health care to abortion, treatment of immigrants, and gun control<br><br>-ve:<br>-&gt;Effect of resulting deficits (supply-side economics)<br>==&gt;US economy's full employment is almost maxed = additional growth push inflation higher - Future problem<br>-&gt;Views trade as a zero-sum game<br>==&gt;May suffer a backlash due to unable to deliver promised trade curbs = voters declining in industries &amp; regions<br>==&gt;US global leadership to shift away from free trade, globalisation &amp; open markets<br>==&gt;-ve for emerging economies &amp; multinational companies whose development models &amp; business strategies have assumed free trade &amp; open capital flows<br>-&gt;Accelerating inflation due to enacting large tax cuts &amp; boosting public spending in an economy already near full employment<br>==&gt;Full interest rates as well<br>==&gt;Disruptive impact on financial markets (regardless of tightening monetary policy to preempt rising prices)<br>-&gt;Excessive strengthening of the US dollar<br>==&gt;Overvalued dollar moves into a self-reinforcing upward spiral due to accumulated dollar debts in emerging markets by governments &amp; companies tempted by near-zero interest rates<br>-&gt;Combination of dollar squeeze &amp; protectionism<br>==&gt;Big trouble for developing countries except relatively closed economies such as Brazil, Russia &amp; India, whose development strategies are less reliant on free trade &amp; foreign financing<br>==&gt;Countries that heavily depend on exports such as Singapore will be affected greatly, therefore their economic growth may slow down<br>-&gt;Contagion effect on Europe<br>==&gt;May trigger another euro crisis<br>==&gt;Threaten the breakup of the European Union<br><br>Overall:<br>-Short-term: Economic growth<br>-Long-term: Currency of dollar may strengthen which leads to inflation</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-30 10:38:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144894733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Analysis for Article 3 (reference) - Summary</title>
         <author>c_jingyuan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144913104</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-ve:<br>-Unemployment rate in USA increases as more jobs such as factory workers are disappearing<br>-This is most likely to be a structural unemployment as there is a relocation of business operation in the USA. Many companies relocate their factories to lower cost countries which has lower labor and land costs. In this article, China is the country that USA is heavily investing on in terms of production of goods.<br>-Structural Unemployment is theoretically inevitable as the economy is dynamic and man will always resort to cheaper solutions. <br>-Despite the efforts made by Mr Donald Trump such as "threatening to slap Chinese imports to the U.S. with 45% tariffs", this strategy will not be effective to bring back the factory jobs back to the country. <br>- This can be seen from the article, "Many U.S. manufacturers then will simply move operations to other countries with low costs such as Vietnam." Hence,  the government strategies is not effective to deal with bringing back factory jobs back to their country as there is always alternatives for manufacturers to set up their factories in low cost labor countries. <br>- This "strategy" however will cause negative impacts as both countries will make "life difficult for each other" whereby consumers in both countries will suffer. <br>-Inflation might also occur as a result. It can be in the case of Demand-Pull inflation as consumer's demand and income of consumer increase. This can be seen from "Meanwhile, U.S. exports to China are growing as wages in that country increase and residents consume more, but not nearly as quickly as imports."<br>  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-12-31 07:25:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144913104</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Add-on to article 3 (reference) analysis</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144933039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Since American companies "fully exploited the opportunities" by "rushing to outsource manufacturing" at China, the employment rate in America will decrease as more labour opportunities will go to China instead, therefore, China is able to become "America's largest creditor" with the "largest international student group at prestigious universities" in America.<br>-With China being their "largest creditor", it is no wonder that America trades more with them in addition to the cheap labour there.<br>-Despite the high tariffs imposed on many American products, consumption and demand of  Chinese goods are still relatively higher due to the strong US dollar, enabling its residents to afford China's goods, thus more able and willing to purchase their items such as electronics and clothing. Similarly, suppliers in America will generate some profits since US goods such as industrial supplies, foods, airplanes and car parts and machineries will then be more expensive to Chinese customers.<br>-Since most labour jobs has been transferred to China, DT resonates with his voters by vowing to bring back these jobs back to America so as to boost its employment rate, ensuring economic stability in the long run. On top of that, DT is planning to export more of US products to the big China market by ensuring that demand of US goods in China is high so that market access for American companies will be easier, thus able to boost America's profit in the long term. He believes that easier market access is made possible by continuing Chinese investment in US real estate and universities whereby students in China are able to enter America's prestigious universities more easily.<br>-The accusation of China deliberately devaluing its currency to help the US raise some concerns to the extent that China's central bank and other state-owned banks have to slow down the depreciation of the Chinese Yuan. To most buyers, this means that exports from China are cheaper, raising demand for Chinese goods. However, by doing the "reverse of currency manipulation", China is robbing Americans of billions of dollars of capital and millions of jobs due to having too many barriers for trade and investment, over favouring local companies as well as weak protection of intellectual property.<br>-</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-01 13:05:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144933039</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>article 3 (reference)</title>
         <author>c_jingyuan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144934751</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Trump has threatened to slap Chinese imports to the U.S. with 45% tariffs. Would that be effective in narrowing the trade deficit and bringing jobs back to the U.S.? <br></strong><br></div><div>Unlikely, economists say. Any measures to lower imports of Chinese products — say, a tariff on a specific industry — will likely result in a tit-for-tat response from China, resulting in higher prices for U.S. exports.<br><br></div><div>Many U.S. manufacturers then will simply move operations to other countries with low costs, such as Vietnam. Raising tariffs is not a guaranteed remedy for regenerating U.S. manufacturing jobs, Prasad says.<br><br></div><div>China could seek to make accessing the Chinese market difficult for American companies. That could mean unforeseen licensing requirements and administrative procedures. Chinese students could be held back from attending American universities. Airbus’ planes could be favored over Boeing. Intellectual property laws may not be enforced as aggressively. China “can start to restrict its market even more," Prasad says. "There’s a lot they can do.”<br><br></div><div>Meanwhile, higher prices on Chinese imports to the U.S. will affect working-class Americans disproportionately, possibly leading to concerns about inflation<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-01 14:35:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144934751</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reference Articles</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144953757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-02 07:34:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144953757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ADD-ON for article 2</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144955895</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Economic consequences of DT<br>1)US growth above 2.2% which is the average annual rate during Barack obama's terms<br>-he will be able to apply the Keynesian fiscal stimulus&nbsp;<br>-something related about being a democrat/ republican LOL<br>-i found out that that with DT as president who is a republican who believes the importance public spendings thus spend more and relax debt limits<br>-more of the classical theory since it focus more on the supply side<br>-same effect: growth &amp; inflation increases<br>-as the economy reaches full employment, additional growth will push inflation higher<br><br>2)Tax reforms/ tax cuts<br>-higher tax cuts aka lower taxes means more people will likely borrow from the bank, increase in spendings<br>-will have budget deficit though as government spend more than they earn : expenditure &gt; revenue which will cause more economic growth &amp; inflation<br>-as bank loosens lending standards aka lowering the interest rate so that people will borrow more<br>-downside: people borrow more thus they will have debt-financed consumption and residential construction meaning more houses will be built is it because ppl have more money thus they will want to buy houses of their own so government will build more house<br><br>3)Geopolitical (International) stability<br>-stronger relations with other countries aka Russia or China<br><br>4)US economy shift away from free trade, globalisation and open markets<br><br>5)with large tax cuts to boost public spendings, accelerates inflation, higher interest rates<br>-excessive strengthening of the US dollars - over valued&nbsp;<br><br>6)Triggering a euro crisis<br>-breakup of the EU</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-02 08:37:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144955895</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ADD-ON </title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144966542</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-China is America's largest creditor,America take advantage of  China's bountiful labor force to fuel an export-oriented country, Chinese government began investing heavily in U.S treasuries, China form a new export market for american products <br> <br>-trade deficit in USA <br>-The gap trade deficit widens with China from 343.1 billion to 365.7 billion as USA import more than they export meaning that Americans consumer more foreign goods as compared to the country shipping their locals goods overseas <br>-the increase is due to US companies taking advantage of China's cheap labor, US exports to China are growing as China increase in wages and residents consume more <br> <br>-china put high tariffs on many american product while US tariffs on Chinese products are low, US goods more expensive for Chinese consumers while Chinese goods cheaper for Americans <br>-Trump could negotiate to broaden local market access for American companies, restrict its theft of U.S. intellectual property and continue Chinese investment in U.S. real estate and universities. “I think he wants China to consume more of our exports,” Kahn says. “He wants more American success there.” <br> <br>- since goods from china is cheaper due to US outsourcing labor in Chna for production of goods, factories producing goods in america will thus instead reduce labor since it is cheaper in China, thus reduce labor and rises in unemployment also due to automation --&gt; cheaper consumer goods <br> <br>-higher tariffs on imports of Chinese products, to reduce imports of Chinese products which also causes the higher prices for U.S exports <br>-this in turn may cause the US manufacturers to move their operations to other countries with low costs which may not regenerate manufacturing jobs in the U.S <br>-this may also result the Chinese market making it difficult for american companies to access the Chinese market, restrict the market, lead to inflation with higher prices on imports from china <br>-a slower china economy, lower demand for oil steel and food or basically other commodities (cost-push inflation?), as well as fewer purchases of american real estate and luxury goods <br>-China faces competition from low-cost labour countries such as Vietnam  thus instead of focusing on export-driven economy, they focus on domestic consumption instead <br>-cannot take place since most of the people in china are aggressive savers instead of spenders <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-02 12:42:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144966542</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ADD ON 1</title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144969511</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-stock prices soared since the election<br>-consumer spending, income growth and inflation weakened last month following a short-lived spurt<br>-household spending rose just 0.2% in nov from the month before<br>-demand for goods and services also is soft, consumer wage gain is at the minimum ( not much increase in real income)<br>-economy is growth at rate of 1.7% for 3 months however foretasted rate was 1.9% which means growth rate is lesser than expected , next year expected growth rate is 2.1%<br>-tax cuts deregulation by Donald trump hopefully would be able to boost businesses,consumer and economic growth<br>-spending on mining exploration doubled as high oil prices and new investment spurred investments<br>-US dollars continue to strengthen since the election which poses as a challenge for manufacturers seeking to sell products into the foreign market<br>-investment in commercial and healthcare building has perked up, employment growth in these sectors such as healthcare and hospitality<br>-inflation remains below target of 2%, (disinflation), gasoline and oil prices have dropping November as compared to October but slowly increased again in December when oil producing countries decided to cut production<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-02 13:32:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/144969511</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Overall Comments by Wang </title>
         <author>I_M_WANG</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145022426</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I almost fell off my chair laughing at both your pictures.<br>Thanks for being so 'into' researching on USA report. LOL. <br><br>I see good team work here and finding joy in completing this assignment is really commendable. Thumbs up for the team U.S.A! <br><br>Please refer to the specific comments I've given below each of your article prelim analysis. The suggestions mentioned are for your team to consider including a few brief points in your final padlet for submission and or to a greater extent, in your country report. <br><br> Do note that these are merely a few suggestions. Please continue to apply even more concepts in your country report. Consider all topics and concepts we have learn so far and also consider illustrations for some of the happenings stated in the articles. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-03 08:20:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145022426</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Comments for First Article (Updated) </title>
         <author>I_M_WANG</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145023680</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I can't read the full WSJ article without subscribing and pay for it.&nbsp;<br>Could team please copy the article and send me for reading please?&nbsp;<br>Thank you!&nbsp;<br><br>10 Jan 2017&nbsp;<br>Thanks for the screenshot. Team might find it a bit challenging to comprehend the stock prices as an indicator on the economy. Stock prices rises might signal positivity in the economy. Household wealth increase if they hold such stocks.&nbsp;<br><br>Noted prelim analysis. Suggest to bring in how sentiments from consumers and businesses affect GDP. Suggest also to bring in economic model to explain this. Article also mentioned about tax cuts. What kind of policy is this? Expansionary or contractionary policy? What is the intend of trump. Will this backfire? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-03 08:37:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145023680</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Comments on Prelim Analysis for Article 3 (reference)</title>
         <author>I_M_WANG</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145024955</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Team is solely focusing the impact of China on USA's GDP and Unemployment. In that case, further research is required to justify team's focus on just one country on the economy of another. <br><br>For example, how high a percentage is China contributing to the USA's GDP? <br>How significant is China in terms of unemployment situation in the USA? This argument would most likely be weak to justify since we can't solely 'blame' any single country for the unemployment of a nation, especially a huge one like U.S.A. <br>Suggest if you have difficulty justifying, please re-select another article. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-03 08:52:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145024955</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Comments on Prelim Analysis  for Article </title>
         <author>I_M_WANG</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145027059</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This is not so much of a news article but rather, a commentary, akin to reading someone's US country report already. However, I'm fine for your group to continue to use this given that there's still opportunities from this article for you to explain and apply economic concepts learn in class. <br><br>Suggestions: <br>- Expand your point on 'Keynesian Fiscal Stimulus', using what you have learn in class. <br>- As you learn monetary policy, explain how Trump is going to finance the fiscal spending. <br>- We didn't cover supply-side policies but if you like, you could read up further and try to apply. Otherwise, it is okay to leave that out. <br>- Trade as a zero-sum game. What does that mean? What is the impact on GDP if Trump views that way and restrict trade? Which component of the GDP will fall? <br>- What type of inflation can you inferred from the article? Is it demand-pull or cost-push inflation?<br>- In terms of currency appreciation, why would it be a bad thing for the US? I noticed that your group has examined in terms of the impact on other countries. Good! Relate it back to your chosen country. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-03 09:19:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145027059</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WSJ Article 1 </title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145321884</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858350/c4db5b8491738319e109e22cb66c771a/MAEC_WSJ_1.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-04 17:17:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145321884</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322177</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858350/9485a7aa85f7b2a2ce9abee97c0c78e9/MAEC_WSJ_2.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-04 17:18:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322177</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322391</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858350/43e5765b7ddfdf20d6c256b49798b879/MAEC_WSJ_3.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-04 17:19:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322391</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322774</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858350/a16cc942f16b329d82cbf61dc1c8f314/MAEC_WSJ_4.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-04 17:20:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322774</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>pearlster1234</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322971</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858350/986124018d2a896135d9400e56cfc668/MAEC_WSJ_5.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-04 17:20:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145322971</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Article 2 add-on</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145891135</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-China expected to face downward pressure in 2017<br>-further depreciation in currency<br>-china trying to stabilise the economy to prevent other countries from exploiting its currency exchange rate<br>-DT slapping china goods = costs jobs<br>-china in a stronger position than in 1990s, DT by opening past debates of using China as a labourer market(?) is harder, therefore America may face losses instead</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 01:32:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145891135</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Article 3 (NEW)</title>
         <author>limjiayan99</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145920292</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/global-economic-outlook-january-2017-201701082341" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:38:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145920292</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>article 3 (new)</title>
         <author>limjiayan99</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921111</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This article mentioned about inflation, GDP, unemployment and fiscal policy which is under Keynesian.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:44:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921111</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>c_jingyuan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921451</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article, US wants to manage a full employment in the country. Measures such as reducing taxes (income and corporate taxes) are implemented. As the economy is near to full employment, real GDP is at the highest and profits are at its maximum. Capacity utilization will also be the highest as all the resources such as machines are fully used. Household income will also be at the highest. As such, when consumers have more disposable income, their ability to purchase will also increase. Demand increases and prices of goods also increase. Inflation rate will also be at its highest point. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:47:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921451</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>limjiayan99</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921466</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>From the graphs in this article, i have found out that US has been struggling to increase their inflation rate since it had dropped during the end of year 2011. despite their several tries in the previous years, they managed to increase a little but it is still not to what their expecting at their inflation target.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:47:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921466</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>limjiayan99</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921789</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/113858348/7b8e83b4fc97f041d0ad5476c2996595/file.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:50:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145921789</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compiled Analysis for Article 1 (+ve)</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922049</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Stock prices soar since Nov election</div><div>⇒ When stock prices soar, despite the stock value being high or low, consumers will not be willing and able to purchase or invest in the stock unless they have raised wages. Therefore, demand may slip, especially luxury items, leading to businesses closing down in extreme cases.</div><div>⇒ Despite the soar in stock prices, according to &lt;name of law&gt;, the economy will adjust itself as &lt;what the law does&gt;.</div><div><br></div><div>2. Steady job creation</div><div>⇒ More jobs created signifies more jobs available for the labour force, thus increasing the employment rate</div><div>⇒ With more jobs, more people are able to work, resulting in more profits generated, thus more investments will be made, causing consumers to spend more, which in turn increase tax revenue and increase demand. Thus, suppliers are more inclined to raise wages and employ more workers.</div><div><br></div><div>3. Increase employment in commercial, health-care &amp; hospital sectors</div><div>⇒ More people in the labour force will be employed, decreasing the unemployment rate, hence working towards full employment to achieve a stable economy</div><div><br></div><div>4. Strengthening of US dollar</div><div>⇒ citizens can take advantage of the currency exchange rate</div><div>⇒ can travel more frequently</div><div>⇒ more PRs and foreigners will want to take up US citizenship to enjoy the benefit</div><div><br></div><div>5. Perked up Investment in commercial and healthcare building</div><div>⇒ Employment growth in these sectors such as healthcare and hospitality</div><div><br></div><div>6. Slow rising rate of inflation</div><div>⇒ Inflation remains below target of 2%, (disinflation)</div><div>⇒ Gasoline and oil prices have dropping November as compared to October but slowly increased again in December when oil producing countries decided to cut production</div><div><br></div><div>7. Rise in Household Spending</div><div>⇒ Rose just by 0.2% in nov from the month before = higher demand = more consumers are able and willing to purchase products = more goods being manufactured = more suppliers increase variety of goods &amp; expand to other markets = better economy</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:52:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922049</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compiled Analysis for Article 1 (-ve)</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922156</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Income growth - flatlined (not much change)</div><div>⇒ Wage &amp; Salary income</div><div>→ Rose 3.5% in Nov from Oct (Slowest year-over-year gain since Dec 2013 despite 3.5% annual pace in 3rd quarter - the best quarterly increase in 2 years)</div><div>⇒ Economy is growth at rate of 1.7% for 3 months, however foretasted rate was 1.9% which means growth rate is lesser than expected, next year expected growth rate is 2.1%</div><div><br></div><div>2. Consumer spending</div><div>⇒ Domestic -&nbsp; 2/3 of Total US output</div><div>⇒ Soft Demand (for factory-made goods)</div><div>⇒ Smaller share of adults holding jobs = Smaller labour force = Smaller employment rate</div><div>⇒ Increased housing &amp; health-care expenses = spend less</div><div>⇒ Consumer wage gain is at minimum</div><div><br></div><div>2.1 Household spending</div><div>⇒ 0.2% in Nov</div><div>⇒ Slowdown from Aug and Oct</div><div>⇒ When consumers cut back on spending, tax revenue reduce, which cause demand to slip. Suppliers will cut back which results in lower wages and higher unemployment that can lead to a recession. In extreme cases, the lack of tax revenue can cause government defaults and the slowdown of banks lending money can create panicked bank runs.</div><div><br></div><div>3. Price inflation</div><div>⇒ Measured by personal-consumption expenditures index (can copy graph)</div><div>⇒ Rose by 1.4% from Nov 2015 = reflected stabilizing energy prices &amp; firmer consumer demand that allows businesses to pass = Raise benchmark interest rate along price increases</div><div>⇒ Inflation readings now are below central bank's 2% target despite support from Fed’s move</div><div>⇒ Could be temporary such as gasoline &amp; oil costs which slumped in Nov but rebounded in Dec due to oil-producing countries agreeing to cut production = very disastrous</div><div><br></div><div>4. Meager economic output</div><div>⇒ Mining exploration, shafts &amp; wells doubled from mid-2009 to end of 2014 = high oil prices &amp; new technologies that spur investment</div><div>⇒ Fell by 2/3 since that point, dragged down output</div><div><br></div><div>5. Strength of US dollar</div><div>⇒ Challenge to manufacturers seeking to sell products into foreign markets (orders for long-lasting durable goods are down slightly in 2016 compared with 2015 despite overall economic growth) = foreign goods in local market is limited</div><div><br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:53:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922156</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compiled Analysis for Article 1 (Measure to counter)</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922298</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. DT's election of tax cuts &amp; deregulation</div><div>⇒ Possibility of boosting businesses, consumers &amp; economic growth (tbc - implementation, response of businesses &amp; households)</div><div>⇒ Currently have some optimism being developed</div><div><br></div><div>2. Relatively conservative planning on market outcomes &amp; aggression on restricting costs</div><div>⇒ Spending on mining exploration doubled as high oil prices and new investment spurred investments</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:54:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922298</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compiled Analysis for Article 1 (Overall)</title>
         <author>xiaokid</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922386</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Measure of economic vitality</div><div>⇒ Income growth</div><div>⇒ Consumer spending</div><div>⇒ Inflation</div><div>⇒ Growing rate at 1.7% in Oct, Nov &amp; Dec 2016 (expects 1.9% growth in 2016 &amp; 2.1% in 2017)</div><div><br></div><div>2. Weakened consumer spending, income growth and inflation (after a short-lived spurt last month)</div><div>⇒ Weakened demand for goods = more businesses investing lesser = more suppliers supplying less amount &amp; variety of goods</div><div>⇒ Keynesian &amp; Classical Theory</div><div>⇒ Uncertain global economy</div><div><br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-09 08:55:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/pearlster1234/e0x8okoo86kw/wish/145922386</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
