https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8 What went wrong in the warm-up video Part 1 and why? What went well in the Part 2 video and why? Discuss what the leader and members did poorly or well in Part 1 vs Part 2 and write a BRIEF summary here. Double click on the wall to post (title your post with your group members' names) en-us 2018-01-22 21:50:59 UTC 2026-01-04 11:34:27 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224045895 Q1.They interrupt the speaker in the process, and they do not let him finish his statement. Also, someone didn't show her patience because she just complained the man's points before he finished. Everyone didn't give a compliment for other's speaking.
Q2. The members let the man finish his points before adding their concerns and also made a compliment for his statements. In addition, the leader authorized the man first. And, everyone made their own points in order and didn't interrupt other people's speaking.]]> 2018-01-23 23:20:25 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224045895 https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224045898 1. In part 1, in the discussion, the member are rude. They interrupt each other. The host doesn't control the discussion in the right way. Having bad attitude, they use many emotional words, which make discussion negative.

2. In part 2, in the discussion, the discussion is going well. It seems that everybody prepares better, and very polite. They listen carefully, everyone has the right to speak. And the host leading the discussion in the right way.]]> 2018-01-23 23:20:26 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224045898 https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046058 part 1 impolite; inconsiderate;
For the leader, she did not control her team; commanding; she didn't take notes

part 2 much more courteous; not much interruption; they agreed with other's ideas first and then came up with their own ideas using " however"; They ask for other's opinions; everyone made eye contact with each other. 
For the leader, started with some basic introduction]]> 2018-01-23 23:21:37 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046058 https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046156 In video Part 1,they did not reach any conclusion after the unpleasant meeting. First, they just kept declining others with negative comments for the events and schedule. Second, unfriendly facial expressions and little eye contact worsed the situation. Moreover, someone sometimes even interrupted the speaker. Therefore, there were no constructive opinions in the end.
However, in video Part 2, they showed effective communication. They chose to agree with the ideas first and then offer more useful suggestions. We noticed that someone was taking the meeting log and the leader guided the discussion such as asking questions with a more friendly tone compared with the first video.]]> 2018-01-23 23:22:31 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046156 https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046237 For the video 1, everyone looks negative. They do not want to go for the activity at all. The person who set up the schedule seems do not care others, with a strong tone. The leader force the process to move on by asking others' thoughts.
For the video 2, people use the positive response first if they have different opinions. Everyone seems willing to participate in the discussion. And they are polite to others with different ideas. The leader gives more freedom when the team are in the discussion. ]]> 2018-01-23 23:23:09 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046237 https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046354 In the first part video, everyone has the same problem, which is negative attitude and keep interrupting others. Also, people tend to ignore others' feelings and just think more for themselves. And politeness is a problem for everyone. The leader in the beginning didn't ask others' opinion about where to go politely.  
On the other hand, in the second part, there is a obvious contrast that people can think more for others and there is no interruption. Everybody listen to others carefully and respond nicely. The leader also offer to ask everyone's opinion about where to go. In the end ,they also reach a satisfying plan. ]]> 2018-01-23 23:24:20 UTC https://padlet.com/salinmiso/dzwg9kyh80e8/wish/224046354