<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Homework Questions by Matthew Poling</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx</link>
      <description>Absolutism and Enlightenment</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:46:39 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-02-24 18:57:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Did John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, although being opposites, ever agree on anything ?</title>
         <author>polinmat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156114135</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Toward the end of his life, Hobbes became a bit more liberal in some of his ideas, but their core ideas were still founded in their opposition.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:48:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156114135</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Where there any philosophes who were impacted negatively by Enlightenment that we haven&#39;t discussed ?</title>
         <author>polinmat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156114364</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Not sure what you mean by impacted negatively by the Enlightenment. I think a lot of the philosophes who advocated for change were or would have been (if they were alive) stunned and horrified by the bloodshed that their ideas helped to cause, especially with the French Revolution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:49:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156114364</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Were Hobbes and Locke persecuted for their radical beliefs?</title>
         <author>polinmat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156115531</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Hobbes' beliefs weren't radical per se, so he was off the hook until later in his life when he offered criticism of things like absolute monarchy. Locke was, believe it or not, not widely read or quoted during his life. It was after he died that his ideas gained steam, so he wasn't the target of any monarch while alive despite his ideas being tremendously radical.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:52:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156115531</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Did revolts still occur under the Enlightened-influenced rulers?</title>
         <author>polinmat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156115752</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There is a difference between a revolt and a revolution. Revolts are usually small in scale, have a focused reason and are easily crushed. Revolutions usually have widespread influence, have a multitude of reasons and are not easily handled. Now, to answer the question: Revolts were commonplace any and everywhere, no matter what type of monarch one had. Revolutions were not widespread until AFTER the French Revolution. By the 19th century, revolutions were happening everywhere it seemed and for many reasons, no matter the type of monarchy. Ultimately, none of the 18th century enlightened monarchs faced revolutions, but their more absolute successors sure did.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:52:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156115752</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Were there any absolute kingdoms that were tolerant of other religions or were they always so monotheistic?</title>
         <author>polinmat</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156117156</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>At times, various monarchs were tolerant of Jews and other denominations of Christianity. But there were just as many examples of violence toward other groups as well. There is no consistent pattern as a nation might have a monarch who is tolerant, but then next monarch might not be.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-24 18:56:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/polinmat/dwrr873l65cx/wish/156117156</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
