<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Civil rights vocab-owen jacobson by OWEN JACOBSON</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l</link>
      <description>uyvouyvoiyviubpojnyv</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-10-26 16:49:01 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-10-30 16:20:34 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/200919029</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-26 16:50:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/200919029</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Exclusionary Rule</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201277257</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Evidence collected in violation of the defendants rights is inadmissible.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:44:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201277257</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Establishment clause</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201279253</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:49:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201279253</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Due Process</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201279904</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:50:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201279904</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Double Jeopardy</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201280428</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>cant be tried for the same crime after the trial.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:52:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201280428</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Speech Plus</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201281319</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;"<strong>speech plus</strong>," which involves conveying an idea or message through behavior.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:54:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201281319</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Suspect Classifications</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201281753</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A <strong>class</strong> of individuals that have been historically subject to discrimination. Any statute that makes a distinction between individuals based on any of the <strong>suspect classifications</strong> (ie. alienage, race) will be subject to a strict scrutiny standard of review before the Supreme Court.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:55:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201281753</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>De Jure Segregation</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201282212</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>De jure segregation</strong> is separation enforced by law, while <strong>de</strong> facto <strong>segregation</strong> occurs when widespread individual preferences, sometimes backed up with private pressure, lead to separation.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:56:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201282212</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Probable Cause</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201282496</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>police can search with reason</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 16:57:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201282496</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bakke Case</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201283845</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:00:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201283845</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Symbolic speech</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284024</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>speech that is symbolic</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:00:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284024</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Incorporation doctrine</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284166</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The <strong><em>incorporation doctrine</em></strong> is a constitutional <strong><em>doctrine</em></strong> through which selected provisions of the Bill of Rights are made applicable to the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:01:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284166</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Engel v. Vitale</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284783</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Engel v</strong>. <strong>Vitale</strong>, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that ruled it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:02:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284783</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Brown v board</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284915</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:03:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201284915</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miranda v Arizona</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201285404</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In <strong>Miranda v</strong>. <strong>Arizona</strong> (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:04:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201285404</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Equal Protection</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201285782</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction "the equal protection of the laws".<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:05:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201285782</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mapp v Ohio</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201286167</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Mapp v</strong>. <strong>Ohio</strong>, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark case in criminal procedure, in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures,"</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:05:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201286167</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Literacy Test </title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201286588</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Southern state legislatures employed <strong>literacy tests</strong> as part of the voter registration process starting in the late 19th century. <strong>Literacy tests</strong>, along with poll taxes and extra-legal intimidation, were used to deny suffrage to African Americans.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:07:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201286588</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Affirmative Action</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201287026</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Affirmative action, also known as reservation in India and Nepal, positive action in the UK, and employment equity in Canada and South Africa, is the policy of favoring members of a disadvantaged group.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:07:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201287026</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jim Crow</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201287912</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:09:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201287912</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Civil rights act of 1964</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288296</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark civil rights and US labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:10:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288296</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roe v Wade</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288637</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Roe v</strong>. <strong>Wade</strong>, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. ... Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:11:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288637</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dred Scott</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288986</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, also known simply as the Dred Scott case, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on US labor law and constitutional law.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:12:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201288986</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy v. Fergusson</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201289321</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Plessy v</strong>. <strong>Ferguson</strong>, 163 US 537 (1896) was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme Court decided in 1896. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but equal".</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:12:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201289321</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gideon v. Wainright</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201289616</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>provide counsel in criminal cases to represent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their own attorneys.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:13:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201289616</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rational Basis Test</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201291332</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Rational basis review</strong>, in U.S. constitutional law, refers to the default standard of <strong>review</strong> that courts apply when considering constitutional questions, including due process or equal protection questions under the Fifth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:17:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201291332</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Free Exercise Clause </title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201291993</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:18:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201291993</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Prior Restraint</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292389</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Prior restraint</strong> (also referred to as <strong>prior</strong> censorship or pre-publication censorship) is censorship imposed, usually by a government, on expression that prohibits particular instances of expression.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:19:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292389</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lemon v. Kurtzman</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292556</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><em>Lemon v. Kurtzman</em></strong>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation">403 U.S. 602</a> (1971),<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_v._Kurtzman#cite_note-lemon-1"><sup>[1]</sup></a> was a case argued before the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States">Supreme Court of the United States</a>. The court ruled in an 8–1<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_v._Kurtzman#cite_note-2"><sup>[2]</sup></a> decision that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania">Pennsylvania</a>'s Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act (represented through <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kurtzman">David Kurtzman</a>) from 1968 was unconstitutional</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:19:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292556</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1st amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292951</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Prohibits Congress from making any law <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause">respecting an establishment of religion</a>, impeding the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Exercise_Clause">free exercise of religion</a>, abridging the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States">freedom of speech</a>, infringing on the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States">freedom of the press</a>, interfering with the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_assembly">right to peaceably assemble</a> or prohibiting the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition">petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:20:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292951</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2nd amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292988</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Protects the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms_in_the_United_States">right to keep and bear arms</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:20:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201292988</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3rd amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293067</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Places restrictions on the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartering_Acts">quartering</a> of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, prohibiting it during peacetime.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:20:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293067</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293092</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Prohibits unreasonable <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_and_seizure">searches and seizures</a> and sets out requirements for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_warrant">search warrants</a> based on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause">probable cause</a> as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293092</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>5th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293139</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sets out rules for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment">indictment</a> by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury">grand jury</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain#United_States">eminent domain</a>, protects the right to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process">due process</a>, and prohibits <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-incrimination">self-incrimination</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy">double jeopardy</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293139</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>6th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293177</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Protects the right to a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trial">fair</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_trial">speedy</a> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_trial">public</a> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_trial">trial by jury</a>, including the rights to be notified of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_accusation">accusations</a>, to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause">confront the accuser</a>, to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpoena">obtain witnesses</a> and to retain <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counsel">counsel</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293177</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>7th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293232</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Provides for the right to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_trial">trial by jury</a> in certain <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawsuit">civil cases</a>, according to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law">common law</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293232</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>8th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293286</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Prohibits excessive <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_(penalty)">fines</a> and excessive <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bail">bail</a>, as well as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruel_and_unusual_punishment">cruel and unusual punishment</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293286</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>14th amendment</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293360</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Defines <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenship_of_the_United_States">citizenship</a>, contains the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause">Privileges or Immunities Clause</a>, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Due_Process_Clause">Due Process Clause</a>, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause">Equal Protection Clause</a>, and deals with post–<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War">Civil War</a> issues.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293360</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slander/libel</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293407</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Defamation</strong> is an area of law that provides a civil remedy when someone's words end up causing harm to your reputation or your livelihood. <strong>Libel</strong> is a written or published defamatory statement, while <strong>slander</strong> is <strong>defamation</strong> that is spoken by the defendant.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293407</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>defamatory speech</title>
         <author>19orjacobson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293498</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> Under common law, to constitute <strong>defamation</strong>, a claim must generally be false and must have been made to someone other than the person defamed. Some common law jurisdictions also distinguish between spoken <strong>defamation</strong>, called slander, and <strong>defamation</strong> in other media such as printed words or images, called libel.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-27 17:21:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/19orjacobson/dqv7igb3g52l/wish/201293498</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
