<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Activity 9. The Origin of the Cell - Ibrahim Dosal by Ibrahim Antonio Dosal Murillo</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-04-22 19:02:41 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-04-26 19:15:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Theory of Spontaneous Generation - 384 BCE</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965178684</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Aristotle along with his student Theophrastus, were two of the earliest recorded scholars to articulate the theory of spontaneous generation. Such theory stated that life can arise from nonliving matter. It was proposed that life could appear or rise from nonliving material if the material had <em>pneuma</em> (“vital heat”). As evidence, he contrasted how animals could appear in places where there were none before, for example, how fish suddenly appear on new puddles or how frogs always appear on muddy enviroments.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/aristotle-statue.jpg?width=1400&amp;quality=55" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-22 19:08:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965178684</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Disproving Spontaneous Generation - 1668</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965195580</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Francesco Redi, was one of the first scientists to give evidence that disproved the theory of Spontaneous Generation. In 1668 he made an experiment to prove that maggots (the larvae of flies) don't spontaneously generate on meat left out in the open air. He predicted that preventing flies from having direct contact with the meat would prevent the appearance of maggots. </p><p><br/></p><p>As his experiment, Redi prepared six containers with meat inside of them. Two of the containers were left open, two were sealed tightly, and the last two were covered with a gauze. Then, his hypothesis was proved when maggots developed in the uncovered jars, but no maggots appeared in the containers covered with a gauze or in the tightly sealed jars. He concluded that maggots could only form when flies were able to lay eggs in the meat, and that the maggots were the offspring of flies, not the product of spontaneous generation.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://geniuses.club/public/storage/023/164/006/022/360_360_6071620ef28c4.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-22 19:23:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965195580</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Disproving Spontaneous Generation - 1745</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965201662</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1745, John Needham published a report of his experiments in which he briefly boiled broth infused with plant or animal matter, with the intention of killing all the microbes in it, and then sealed the flasks. After a few days he observed that the broth had become cloudy and a single drop contained numerous microscopic creatures. He argued that the new microbes must have arisen spontaneously. </p><p><br/></p><p>Lazzaro Spallanzani got wind of the experiments Needham had done, and he did not agree with it's conclusions. He then performed hundreds of carefully executed experiments using heated broth just like Needham did. He prepared broth in sealed jars and unsealed jars that were infused with plant and animal matter. Spallanzani’s results contradicted the findings of Needham: Heated but sealed flasks remained clean, without any signs of spontaneous growth, unless the flasks were opened to the air. This suggested that microbes were introduced into these flasks from the air, not spontanously generated. </p><p><br/></p><p>Needham, defeated and as a last minute struggle proposed that Lazzaro had destroyed a "life force" from which life comes from thanks to the extended boiling processes.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.daviddarling.info/images/Spallanzani.gif" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-22 19:30:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965201662</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Contest for Truth - 1858</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965204610</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>To settle the debate, the Paris Academy of Sciences offered a prize for the resolution of the year old dispute, the debate over spontaneous generation. </p><p><br></p><p>Louis Pasteur, a prominent French chemist accepted the challenge. </p><p><br></p><p>In 1858, Pasteur filtered air through a gun-cotton filter, examined the cotton, and found it full of microorganisms. Suggesting that exposure of a broth to air was not introducing a “life force” to the broth but rather airborne microorganisms.</p><p><br></p><p>Later, Pasteur made a series of flasks with long, twisted necks (“swan-neck” flasks), in which he boiled broth to sterilize it. The design allowed air inside the flasks to be exchanged with air from the outside, but prevented the introduction of any airborne microorganisms, which would get caught in the twists and bends of the flasks’ necks. If a life force besides the airborne microorganisms were responsible for microbial growth within the sterilized flasks, it would have access to the broth, whereas the microorganisms would not. He correctly predicted that sterilized broth in his swan-neck flasks would remain sterile as long as the swan necks remained intact. </p><p><br></p><p>Pasteur’s set of experiments disproved the theory of spontaneous generation and earned him the prestigious Alhumbert Prize from the Paris Academy of Sciences in 1862. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Louis_Pasteur%2C_foto_av_Paul_Nadar%2C_Crisco_edit.jpg/800px-Louis_Pasteur%2C_foto_av_Paul_Nadar%2C_Crisco_edit.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-22 19:33:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2965204610</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First Cell - 1920</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968211435</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Around the year 1920 it was suggested that simple organic molecules could form and spontaneously polymerize into macromolecules under the conditions thought to exist in primitive Earth's atmosphere. Millions of years ago, the atmosphere of Earth was thought to have contained little or no oxygen, instead consisting principally of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> in addition to smaller amounts of gases such as H<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, and CO. Such an atmosphere provides reducing conditions in which organic molecules, given a source of energy such as sunlight or electrical discharge, can form spontaneously. </p><p><br></p><p>The spontaneous formation of organic molecules was first demonstrated experimentally in the 1950s, when Stanley Miller and Harold Urey showed that the discharge of electric sparks into a mixture of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and NH<sub>3</sub>, in the presence of water, led to the formation of a variety of organic molecules. Although Miller's experiments did not precisely reproduce the conditions of primitive Earth, they clearly demonstrated the plausibility of the synthesis of organic molecules, providing the basic materials from which the first living organisms arose.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2114817546/7e9d4880dcb88fb8ffd4e0fce72d2b1b/Screenshot_2024_04_24_at_8_24_39_a_m_.png" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 14:26:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968211435</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Endosymbiotic Theory - 1950</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968408195</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It is thought that life came to be on earth around four billion years ago. The Endosymbiotic Theory states that some of the organelles in today's eukaryotic cells were once prokaryotic microbes. It states that the first eukaryotic cell was probably an amoeba-like cell that got nutrients by phagocytosis (a way to asimilate exterior patogens in cells) and contained a nucleus that formed when a piece of the cytoplasmic membrane pinched off around the chromosomes. </p><p><br></p><p>Some of these organisms ingested prokaryotic cells that then survived within the organism and developed a symbiotic relationship. Mitochondria formed when bacteria capable of aerobic respiration were ingested; chloroplasts formed when photosynthetic bacteria were ingested, which then eventually lost their cell wall and much of their DNA because they were not of benefit within the host cell. Mitochondria and chloroplasts cannot grow outside their host cell.</p><p><br></p><p>Evidence for this is based on the following:</p><ol><li><p>Chloroplasts are the same size as prokaryotic cells, divided by binary fission, and, like bacteria, have FTS proteins at their division plane. The mitochondria are the same size as prokaryotic cells, divide by binary fission, and the mitochondria of some protists have FTS homologs at their division plane.</p></li><li><p>Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA that is circular, not linear.</p></li><li><p>Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own ribosomes that have 30S and 50S subunits, not 40S and 60S.</p></li><li><p>Several more primitive eukaryotic microbes, such as <em>Giardia</em> and <em>Trichomonas</em> have a nuclear membrane but no mitochondria.</p></li></ol>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.biologyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Endosymbiotic-theory-definition-and-example.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 16:55:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968408195</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Theory of Spontaneous Generation - 384 BCE</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968559252</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Libretexts. (2024, April 21). <em>3.1: Spontaneous generation</em>. Biology LibreTexts. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:09:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968559252</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Disproving Spontaneous Generation - 1668</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968559698</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Libretexts. (2024, April 21). <em>3.1: Spontaneous generation</em>. Biology LibreTexts. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:09:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968559698</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Disproving Spontaneous Generation - 1745</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Libretexts. (2024, April 21). <em>3.1: Spontaneous generation</em>. Biology LibreTexts. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:10:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Contest for Truth - 1858</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560716</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Libretexts. (2024, April 21). <em>3.1: Spontaneous generation</em>. Biology LibreTexts. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(OpenStax)/03%3A_The_Cell/3.01%3A_Spontaneous_Generation</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:10:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560716</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First Cell - 1920</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560978</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Cooper, G. M. (2000). <em>The origin and evolution of cells</em>. The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9841/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9841/</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:11:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968560978</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Endosymbiotic Theory</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968561869</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Cooper, G. M. (2000). <em>The origin and evolution of cells</em>. The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9841/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9841/</a></p><p><br/></p><p>Libretexts. (2023, August 31). <em>7.8: The Endosymbiotic Theory</em>. Biology LibreTexts. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(Kaiser)/Unit_4%3A_Eukaryotic_Microorganisms_and_Viruses/07%3A_The_Eukaryotic_Cell/7.8%3A_The_Endosymbiotic_Theory">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(Kaiser)/Unit_4%3A_Eukaryotic_Microorganisms_and_Viruses/07%3A_The_Eukaryotic_Cell/7.8%3A_The_Endosymbiotic_Theory</a></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-24 19:12:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2968561869</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First Cell - 1920</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2971586436</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Other theories that talk about non-living matter giving rise to life as we know it is the Oparin-haldane hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that life arose gradually from inorganic molecules, with “building blocks” like amino acids forming first and then combining to make complex polymers. </p><p><br/></p><p>Other theories that some scientists support are the "RNA world" hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that the first life was self-replicating RNA. Others favor the metabolism-first <strong>hypothesis</strong>, placing metabolic networks before DNA or RNA.</p><p><br/></p><p>And lastly, the Panspermian theory, this hypothesis was first given life by Greek philosopher Anaxagoras who asserted that life traveled in the universe in the form of seed. Nowadays, the theory states that spores from other planets came to other recipient planets on board meteorites.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://live.staticflickr.com/128/318680204_26868deec2_b.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-26 19:10:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2971586436</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First Cell - 1920</title>
         <author>ibrahimdosalm</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2971589965</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Hypotheses about the origins of life (article) | Khan Academy</em>. (n.d.). Khan Academy. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/natural-selection/origins-of-life-on-earth/a/hypotheses-about-the-origins-of-life">https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/natural-selection/origins-of-life-on-earth/a/hypotheses-about-the-origins-of-life</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-04-26 19:15:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ibrahimdosalm/dqqtwg8nwson1bb7/wish/2971589965</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
