<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>In the text, it is shown that when defining Assistive Technology the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA)(Representatives U. S., 2000)included an exception. It said that when defining the Assistive Technology, the term was not to include medical devices that is surgically implanted, or the replacement of such device. What happens when there is a student who is in need of a feeding tube and the family cannot afford it? Does the district just ignores the fact that the student is not receiving the appropiate nutrition?  by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/katerynbernal/dntcavti15un</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-08-03 04:31:24 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-08-04 15:12:34 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Reference</title>
         <author>katerynbernal</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katerynbernal/dntcavti15un/wish/180017793</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Representatives, U. S. (2000, October 30). <em>IDEA - Building The Legacy of IDEA 2004</em>. Retrieved 7 15, 2017, from idea.ed.gov</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-03 04:59:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katerynbernal/dntcavti15un/wish/180017793</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
