Q-3 Practice - Focus: Body Paragraph's line of reasoning by Esmeralda Shreiner https://padlet.com/esmeralda_shreiner/dlieiy5mp3m6 In today's exercise, we will practice establishing a line of reasoning (claim, evidence, justification) for different claims and counterclaims. en-us 2018-09-18 17:38:17 UTC 2021-05-01 13:00:11 UTC hello@padlet.com The supreme court should not rule in favor of the student as the student's actions were harmful and disruptive to the overall health of the school programs meant to instill a healthy environment for students. esmeralda_shreiner https://padlet.com/esmeralda_shreiner/dlieiy5mp3m6/wish/1479624883 What is at stake here is more than just a freedom of speech issue where a student has a "right" to express their frustrations at home, but rather the responsibility the student has to curb her "freedom of speech" for the wellness of her community in an age where technology has made private spaces public spaces and thus increased the impact of their words on fellow students.  
The supreme court in a sense needs to consider their own set precedent decided in the past to come to a conclusion that is best for the community at large.  For instance in  previous Supreme Court decisions set in 1986 Bethel v Fraser and Tinker v Des Moines (1969) the Supreme court ruled that schools can punish student for wearing clothing with words, images, or symbols that are vulgar or lewd (Bethel v Fraser) and  cause serious disruption at school or violate the other student's rights (Tinker v Des Moines).  This young girl's words while not normally an issue if she were to voice her profanity laced objections to a disappointing result to a group of friends at home or in a non viral setting, it is a completely different matter when she decides to publicly (knowing it would reach the school, students, and staff) disrupt the wellness of the program overall.  It is clear the student was made aware of the consequences for the code of conduct to participate in extra curricular activities at her school.  The argument that her first amendment rights were violated is absurd.  Her actions violated the school's code of conduct designed to ]]> 2021-04-30 18:54:23 UTC https://padlet.com/esmeralda_shreiner/dlieiy5mp3m6/wish/1479624883 Supreme Court decisions set precedent and in this case if the court rules in favor esmeralda_shreiner https://padlet.com/esmeralda_shreiner/dlieiy5mp3m6/wish/1480854221 2021-05-01 12:56:52 UTC https://padlet.com/esmeralda_shreiner/dlieiy5mp3m6/wish/1480854221