In addition, Pershing had a profound effect on the leaders he trained and coached, such as Dwight Eisenhower, George Marshall, and George Patton, all of whom recognized his influence on their own professional paths and warfare tactics. While his tactics may not have been revolutionary, Pershing's steady growth as a commander and his ability to adapt to the challenges of modern warfare solidified his place in history as a leader who was "Great War Good Enough."

Pershing continued to have a major influence on how the U.S. Army would develop after the war. During his tenure as Army Chief of Staff (1921–1924), he introduced a number of modernization and training initiatives to get the army ready for future wars. The Army Industrial War College and the introduction of inquiry boards aimed at distilling the lessons of World War I were two of Pershing's initiatives that prepared the way for the army's reform during the interwar years. Pershing's influence extended beyond his military accomplishments. He mentored and influenced a generation of future military leaders, all of whom would play pivotal roles in World War II. Pershing's legacy as a commander and a mentor endures, highlighting his lasting impact on the U.S. military and its leaders.

1. Vision: With an emphasis on developing a powerful, autonomous American army, Pershing had a clear idea of the AEF's function and the significance of US involvement in the war.

2. Communication: One of the most important positive leadership traits that greatly boosted his success as a commander was his capacity to listen to his subordinates. Pershing recognized the importance of the experiences and insights of the people he commanded and knew that their firsthand knowledge was essential for making well-informed decisions.

3. Integrity: Pershing gained the respect and confidence of his troops by being a man of integrity and a committed team player.

4. Resilience: Despite the loss of his family due to a house fire in 1915, he managed to channel his grief into his military duties, demonstrating extraordinary emotional strength and resilience.

5. Decisiveness: Even amid combat, Pershing was able to make difficult judgments swiftly and decisively.

6. Inspiration: He gave his soldiers a great sense of pride and purpose by instilling in them confidence and motivation.

7. Courage: Pershing took the initiative and was not afraid to put himself in danger to see the objective through to completion.

   
   

Flaws:

1. Stubbornness: Pershing's unwavering resolve and strong will occasionally come across as stubbornness, which caused him to clash with allies and subordinates.

2. Micromanagement: Pershing was occasionally chastised for excessively controlling various facets of the AEF's activities, which was seen to be detrimental to initiative and morale.

3. Restricted adaptability: Many people point to his early difficulties adjusting to trench warfare during World War I as a serious weakness in his leadership. With his vast background in more traditional combat, Pershing had a steep learning curve when it came to the harsh and unchanging character of trench warfare on the Western Front.

4. Risk aversion: Pershing tended to avoid taking unwarranted chances, which could be viewed as a weakness in circumstances calling for audacious action.

5. Interpersonal skills: Although his soldiers held Pershing in high regard, his leadership style may have come out as cold and impersonal, devoid of warmth and compassion.

All things considered, General Pershing showed a great deal of leadership qualities that helped him succeed as a military commander. Like any leader, he was not without shortcomings, though, and these might have limited his effectiveness in some circumstances.

1. Creation of Investigating Boards: Pershing set up the Lewis and Superior Boards following World War I, which compiled the lessons learned by the American Army during that conflict. These boards provided the foundation for further doctrinal development and army reforms during the 1920s and 1930s.

2. Emphasis on Professional Education: From 1921 to 1924, Pershing served as Army Chief of Staff, and during that time he underlined the value of professional education for army leaders. He created the Army Industrial War College and enlarged the army's educational program, laying the theoretical groundwork for the United States to emerge from World War II as the Arsenal of Democracy.

3. Mentoring Future Leaders: Young officers like George Marshall and George Patton, who later played important roles in World War II, were shaped and mentored by Pershing. Additionally, he supported Dwight Eisenhower, helping to mold his views on war and future career.

4. Professionalism's Legacy: Pershing had an impact on his mentees' leadership during World War II, even though he did not directly command them. Particularly Eisenhower acknowledged Pershing's role in the triumph in Europe.

General Pershing’s Leadership Failures:

1. Limited Operational Brilliance: Pershing's tactical judgments were occasionally questioned, and he did not always exhibit exceptional brilliance as an operational leader. On the other hand, his comprehension of the conditions of contemporary battle on the Western Front increased steadily.

2. Casualties: Like many other leaders in his era, Pershing conceded that war would inevitably result in casualties. The AEF's high death toll may have been seen by some as a failure, but it also served as a reflection of the brutality of World War I and the difficulties an inexperienced force faced.

3. Limited Operational Brilliance: Pershing's tactical judgments were occasionally questioned, and he did not always exhibit exceptional brilliance as an operational leader. On the other hand, his comprehension of the conditions of contemporary battle on the Western Front increased steadily.

   
   

Pershing may not have been a "great commander" in the conventional sense, but it is important to consider the historical background, the army he commanded, and the difficulties he encountered during World War I when analyzing his leadership successes and shortcomings.

Notwithstanding these critiques, Pershing's leadership influence lasted. Modern military doctrine was developed as a result of his post-war attempts to distill the lessons learned from the conflict and restructure the U.S. Army's educational program. Studying Pershing's leadership today can teach us a lot about coalition warfare intricacies, organizational management, and strategic decision-making. His focus on education, professionalism, and flexibility is still applicable to leaders today who are dealing with comparable difficulties. All things considered, despite his imperfections, General Pershing left behind a notable record of accomplishment and long-lasting impact.

Adas, M. (2014). Ambivalent Ally: American Military Intervention and the Endgame and Legacy of World War I. Diplomatic History, 38(4), 700–712 https://doi.org/10.1093/dh/dhu032.

Gabel, C. &. (2010). Great Commanders. In P. Richard S. Faulkner, John J. Pershing "The Very Model of a Modern Major General?" (pp. 123-147). Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press.

War, T. G. (2018, August 20). Creating An American Army - John J. Pershing I WHO DID WHAT IN WW1? Retrieved from YouTube: https://youtu.be/xffX-4jC-4g?si=1uWenb8nYIkc1aqG

Zabecki, D. T. (2018). Racing Headlong. Military History, 35(1), 30–39.