https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017 Please feel free to submit any questions relevant to the material covered in the lectures. These will form the basis for the revision part of the March lectures (24 and 28 March 2017). You have time to do so until 22 March 2017. You're welcome to sign your questions, so you can get credit for it and a comprehensive answer. en-us 2017-02-16 10:45:56 UTC 2017-03-28 10:03:17 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/File.png jachecneale https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/154263013 2017-02-16 10:56:47 UTC https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/154263013 https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/159773876 Why do we need S.40 to lift restrictions on authority if it was found that someone has apparent/ostensible authority to do something?
It seems redundant to find that there is apparent authority, when there was no express authority, and then to apply S.40 to lift limitations on  this apparent authority that  was not suppose to be there because of limitations on express authority.


Does S.40 applies only for directors acting collectively but failing to be a complete Board (e.g. inquorate)? Or can it apply to individual director(s)?]]> 2017-03-13 17:54:43 UTC https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/159773876 https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/162375418 Will an individual still be liable for fraudulent trading if they had the intent to defraud a creditor, but in fact a different creditor was defrauded to that intended? ]]> 2017-03-24 11:52:02 UTC https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/162375418 https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/163062141 2017-03-28 10:01:40 UTC https://padlet.com/jachecneale/companylawrevision2017/wish/163062141