EXAMPLE: Alaska Resources Exploitation Presentation Rubric by Deborah Rinio

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Uses limited evidence from 1-2 sources. Sources may lack credibility or diversity. Citations are inconsistent or incomplete.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Incorporates evidence from 2-3 credible sources. Sources are somewhat diverse but may favor one perspective. Most citations are properly formatted and provided.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Expertly integrates evidence from 4+ credible sources. Sources are diverse (academic, government, industry) and well-balanced. Citations are properly formatted and consistently provided.

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Argument about resource exploitation is unclear or inconsistent. Position lacks adequate support or logical flow. Examples may be vague or irrelevant.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Presents a generally clear argument about resource exploitation with adequate logical flow. Position is supported but may have some gaps in reasoning or examples.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Presents a clear, compelling argument about resource exploitation with strong logical flow. Position is consistently supported throughout the presentation with specific examples and data.

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Information contains several inaccuracies or is outdated. Understanding of the resource and its exploitation status shows significant gaps.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

Most information presented is accurate and relatively current. Some details about the resource may be general or slightly imprecise but core concepts are correct.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:41 UTC

All information presented is accurate and current. Details about the resource, its use, and exploitation status are comprehensive and precisely explained.

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Struggles to respond to questions effectively. Answers are vague, incomplete, or show limited understanding of the topic.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Responds to most questions adequately with some supporting details. Shows general understanding of the topic but may occasionally lack depth in responses.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Responds to classmates' questions with confidence, depth, and specific details. Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of the topic through thoughtful, well-elaborated answers.

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Poses few questions or questions that are superficial/basic. Shows minimal engagement with other presentations.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Poses adequate questions that show basic engagement with other presentations. Questions are relevant but may lack depth or complexity.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:30:42 UTC

Poses thoughtful, relevant questions to other presenters that demonstrate critical thinking and deep engagement with their topics. Questions encourage meaningful discussion.

Developing (1 point)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:34:48 UTC

Rarely participates in group discussions. Does not offer constructive feedback. Struggles to divide tasks fairly or accomplish assigned tasks on time. Does not participate in group presentation.

Proficient (2 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:34:48 UTC

Participates regularly in group discussions. Offers some constructive feedback. Contributes equally in task division and often completes tasks on time. Participates in group presentation.

Advanced (3 points)

d88s183_ — 2025-04-19 00:34:48 UTC

Actively participates in and facilitates group discussions. Offers valuable, constructive feedback. Excels in fair task division and consistently completes tasks ahead of time. Equitably participates in group presentation.