https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g en-us 2016-10-27 12:18:45 UTC 2016-10-31 12:49:52 UTC hello@padlet.com connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133592107 Potter, Andrew. "Support the troops but not the war? Sheer hypocrisy. Would you complain about taxes, yet put a 'support the taxman' sticker on your car?" Maclean's 23 July 2007: 16. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 27 Oct. 2016.

]]> 2016-10-27 12:46:54 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133592107 connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133592404 http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/MagazinesDetailsPage/MagazinesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Magazines&currPage=&scanId=&query=&prodId=OVIC&search_within_results=&p=OVIC%3AGIC&mode=view&catId=&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CA166694126&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=&source=Bookmark&u=eliz67579&jsid=5c3b4e97cf99b687038e5bc4930f5e0f]]> 2016-10-27 12:47:42 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133592404 connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133593080 This whole passage states the problem about supporting the troops but not the war. Toronto voted to remove the "support the troops" decals from fire trucks and ambulances. As some examples that the author gave us was a vegetarian who declares support for butchers or drivers that don't like parking tickets but support the meter maid.]]> 2016-10-27 12:49:33 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133593080 connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133863981 "I doubt there is a single Canadian willing to put a "support the taxman" sticker on the back of their car. So what are we to make, then, of the fact that even those most viscerally opposed to the war in Afghanistan feel obliged to declare their undiluted support for the troops?" This is the hypocrisy behind the war in Afghanistan, the people feel obligated to support the troops but 
don't want to support the war.]]> 2016-10-28 12:19:57 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133863981 connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133865545 In the text it states "The British Lord Dunmore in Virginia offered freedom-total freedom- to any slave who escapes to his camp." So if Isabel runs away to join his camp she will be free. Then later in the text "I cannot accept your service, child. We only employ slaves who run away from rebel owners." The british went back on their word about accepting all slaves.]]> 2016-10-28 12:27:24 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133865545 connor_a_alspaugh https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133866087 They fit together by both the article and the book saying or displaying something that not following it or agreeing to it. In the article the people are supporting the troops but not the war and this is not supporting the whole idea just part of it. In the book the British say that they will accept all runaway slaves but when Isabel gets there the commander says the she can't be accepted because she has run away from a house of a loyalist]]> 2016-10-28 12:30:26 UTC https://padlet.com/connor_a_alspaugh/d5mne0t8430g/wish/133866087