https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n en-us 2018-06-01 11:50:56 UTC 2018-06-01 18:24:18 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084780 #1:Personal Experiences bring in prejudices towards other people. People assume the rest of a story based on their experiences. Juror #3 was hit by his son and he was showing prejudice towards the youth of the trial. Juror #10 was an older man and was saying that because the boy was from the "Slums" he must've committed the murder. He was going off of the stereotype of the neighborhood. He had refused to believe any idea coming from the other jurors. He was stubborn and blamed the boy for the actions of others that came from the slums. Juror #7 was a follower, he was a racist man who wasn't taking the case seriously. He wanted to finish the case as soon as possible so that he could watch his ball game. He decided to switch to "Not Guilty" due to the fact that the majority had switched over.

#2: Based on peoples morals, it will depict their choices in life. Several people of the jury decided to vote with the "herd". Juror #8 went against the herd and voted with his morals and did what he thought was right.

#3: Juror #3 and Creon are both stubborn and refuse to see anyone's opinion other than their own. Antigone and Juror #8 both went against the norm, the herd, and they both fought for what they thought was the right thing to do even thought people were telling them they were wrong. Haimon is to Antigone as Juror #9 is to Juror #8 (Copyright 2018). Haimon fought for his fiance and stood up for Antigone against his father. This is similar to the actions of Juror #9. He brought out new evidence, such as the marks from the glasses, and backed up juror #8 when everyone told him he was speaking nonsense. ]]> 2018-06-01 17:56:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084780 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084859 1. Juror 3 is a good example of how this can happen. He was stubbornly biased, he couldn't back up his opinion to contribute with facts. Juror 10 thought the slums were full of bad people, so he used this as his reasoning to find the boy as guilty. Juror 7 just wanted to go to his baseball game and get this over with. 

2. Juror 8 realized that this wasn't what it seemed, so he used tons of examples to provide a reasonable doubt for the boy to be guilty. So he used what he felt justice was to go against everyone else telling him that the man was guilty. The fact that the boy could've been sent to the electric chair if Juror 8 didn't stand up for him shows that he had a better, more justified, definition of justice.

3. Creon and Juror 3 are both stubborn and biased based off of past experiences. They both were steadfast in what they believed and wouldn't change their opinion once confronted with substantial evidence. Antigone, Haimon and Juror #8 are alike in that they all stood up for what they perceived as justice. ]]> 2018-06-01 17:57:21 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084859 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084953 people relate things to personal experiences - so the jury can be bias (juror #3)]]> 2018-06-01 17:57:47 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265084953 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085079 2018-06-01 17:58:25 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085079 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085126 1. This all takes away justice due to personal opinions and fails to promote fairness.

Juror 3-  his personal connections to this typa story makes him wanna kill the boy

Juror 10- he has a biased opinion of people from "the slums" as bad people and meanies. He promotes prejudice.

Juror 7- because he only cared about himself and baseball, he did whatever he could (which obstructed the justice) to leave
this included changing his vote just cause and complaining and talking about the Yankees.

2. Like juror 8, he understood the cost of death and saw all the reasonable doubts that the kiddo did not kill his daddio. He eventually ended up convincing all the other jurors that the boy was innocent due to his FACTS and LOGIC (not biased opinions!!!).

3. Creon and Juror #3- both follow their own rules and their own beliefs. they act on what THEY think is just. (creon makes his own laws, defying the gods'. JUror 3 is still like hating on his son and using his own sad past boohoo to sway his opinion). Antigone, Haimon, and Juror #8, however, act on what they believe is RIGHT and JUST, which is the higher law of the supreme court or the gods

]]> 2018-06-01 17:58:40 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085126 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085223 1. Juror 3's strong belief in proving the boy guilty seemed to be influence by his personal situation and his relation with himself and his son. He believed it was obviously clear that the boy was guilty of killing the father. Juror 10 was very prejudice and cruel. He was mainly focused on where the boy  grew up. Juror 7 vote seemed to rest more on his personal indifferences more than the evidence. He was eager to wrap up the case quickly. He was not invested in the case he was more concerned with going to the baseball game. He was quick to say the case should be left on a hung jury. 

2. Juror 8 didnt think that the boy was guilty so he went against the group which made for a long and aggressive discussion about whether or not the evidence was factual and plausible

3. Creon and Juror 3 had similar qualities. Creon's pride was his downfall; Juror 3 was strong minded and prejudice. Both characters had no regards for what the judicial system/ laws of the gods. 
Antigone, Haimon, and Juror 8 were also greatly effected by their own pride. In the movie, Juror 8 was the only juror to intially vote not guilty. All three characters acted on behalf of what they believe was right. They were not influenced by the crowd. ]]> 2018-06-01 17:59:17 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085223 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085469 The very ink with which history is written is merely fluid prejudice. ~Mark Twain]]> 2018-06-01 18:00:51 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085469 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085531 So it causes people to stand up for their beliefs even if it is against the majority 

]]> 2018-06-01 18:01:15 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085531 https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085869 Creon was really hard with the laws he set and Juror #3 was like really hard in his belief that the boy was guilty. Antigone and Haimon were not afraid to stick up for what they believe and go against the majority just like juror #8 who convinced every other juror to switch to not guilty. ]]> 2018-06-01 18:03:27 UTC https://padlet.com/jschaeffer/d1kb5pfv2g4n/wish/265085869