Williams, Raymond. Marxism and literature. Vol. 392. Oxford Paperbacks, 1977.

Macherey, Pierre Etienne. "Literature as an ideological form: some Marxist propositions." Oxford Literary Review 3.1 (1978): 4-12.

Csicsery-Ronay Jr, Istvan. "Marxist theory and science fiction." The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction (2003): 113-124.

O'Flinn, Paul. "Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein." Popular Fictions. Routledge, 2013. 196-221.

Hodges, Devon. "Frankenstein and the Feminine Subversion of the Novel." Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 2.2 (1983): 155-164.

Williams, Raymond. Marxism and literature. Vol. 392. Oxford Paperbacks, 1977.

Morton, Timothy. "Frankenstein and ecocriticism." The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein (2016): 143-157.

2. Malchow, Howard L. "Frankenstein's monster and images of race in nineteenth-century Britain." Past & Present 139 (1993): 90-130.

3. Byrne, Deirdre. "The meaning (s) of Frankenstein." Journal of Literary Studies 9.2 (1993): 170-184.

4. Hammond, Kim. "Monsters of modernity: Frankenstein and modern environmentalism." cultural geographies 11.2 (2004): 181-198.

5. Jones, Jonathan. "Hidden voices: Language and ideology in philosophy of language of the long eighteenth century and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." Textual Practice 19.3 (2005): 265-287.

6. Hansen, Mark. "Not Thus, after All, Would Life Be Given":" Technesis", Technology and the Parody of Romantic Poetics in" Frankenstein." Studies in Romanticism 36.4 (1997): 575-609.

7. Morton, Timothy. "Frankenstein and ecocriticism." The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein (2016): 143-157.

8. Greenaway, Jon. Capitalism: A Horror Story: Gothic Marxism and the Dark Side of the Radical Imagination. Watkins Media Limited, 2024.

9. Smith, Allan Lloyd. "‘This Thing of Darkness’: Racial Discourse in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." Gothic Studies 6.2 (2004): 208-222.

10. Lamb, John B. "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Milton's monstrous myth." Nineteenth-Century Literature 47.3 (1992): 303-319.

2. O'Flinn, Paul. "Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein." Popular Fictions. Routledge, 2013. 196-221.

3. Moretti, Franco. "The dialectic of fear." New Left Review 136.1 (1982): 67-85.

Eagleton, Terry. Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. Verso, 2006.

Forgacs, David. "Marxist literary theories." Modern literary theory: A comparative introduction (1982): 145-51.

Frow, John. "Marxism and literary history." Ideology. Routledge, 2014. 295-302.

Juengel, Scott J. "Face, Figure, Physiognomics: Mary Shelley's" Frankenstein" and the Moving Image." Novel: A Forum on Fiction. Vol. 33. No. 3. Duke University Press, 2000.

McLane, Maureen N. "Literate Species: Populations," Humanities," and Frankenstein." Elh 63.4 (1996): 959-988.

McWhir, Anne. "Teaching the monster to read: Mary Shelley, education and Frankenstein." The educational legacy of Romanticism (1990): 73-92.

Michie, Elsie B. "Frankenstein and Marx's Theories of Alienated Labor." Approaches to Teaching Shelley's Frankenstein (1990): 93-98.

O'Flinn, Paul. "Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein." Popular Fictions. Routledge, 2013. 196-221.

Williams, Raymond. Marxism and literature. Vol. 392. Oxford Paperbacks, 1977.

Hammond, Kim. "Monsters of modernity: Frankenstein and modern environmentalism." cultural geographies 11.2 (2004): 181-198.

Hoeveler, Diane. "Frankenstein, feminism, and literary theory." (2003).

Levine, George. "" Frankenstein" and the Tradition of Realism." Novel: A Forum on Fiction. Vol. 7. No. 1. Duke University Press, 1973.

Mouzelis, Nicos. "Marxism or post-Marxism?." New Left Review 167.1 (1988): 107-123.

O'Flinn, Paul. "Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein." Popular Fictions. Routledge, 2013. 196-221.

Pollin, Burton R. "Philosophical and literary sources of Frankenstein." Comparative Literature 17.2 (1965): 97-108.

Rupert, Mark. "Marxism." International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, 2007. 45-56.

Therborn, G. (2018). From Marxism to Post-Marxism?. Verso Books.

Williams, Raymond. Marxism and literature. Vol. 392. Oxford Paperbacks, 1977.

Comitini, P. (2006). The Limits of Discourse and the Ideology of Form in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein.” Keats-Shelley Journal, 55, 179–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30210650

Malchow, H. L. (1993). Frankenstein’s Monster and Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Past & Present, 139, 90–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/651092

Hobbs, C. (1993). Reading the Symptoms: An Exploration of Repression and Hysteria in Mary Shelley's" Frankenstein". Studies in the Novel, 25(2), 152-169.

O'Flinn, P. (2013). Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein. In Popular Fictions (pp. 196-221). Routledge.

Shelley, M., & Bolton, G. (2018).

frankenstein. In Medicine and Literature, Volume Two (pp. 35-52). CRC Press.

Hoeveler, D. (2003). Frankenstein, feminism, and literary theory.

McLane, M. N. (1996). Literate Species: Populations," Humanities," and Frankenstein. Elh, 63(4), 959-988.

Eagleton, T. (2006). Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. Verso.

Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to general intellect: Elements for a Marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical materialism, 15(1), 13-36.

Kirejczyk, J. (2022). Early German Romantic and Marxian Theories of Alienation in Frankenstein: Atomizing Effects of Commodification of Nature and Transgressive Science: An Eco-Marxist perspective.

Hoeveler, D. (2003). Frankenstein, feminism, and literary theory.

Haubrich, M. (1999). The Self-Created Self: A Marxist Critique of Creature Self-Creation in Frankenstein (Vol. 1999, No. 1999). Red Deer College.

2, Comitini, Patricia. "The Limits of Discourse and the Ideology of Form in Mary Shelley's" Frankenstein"." Keats-Shelley Journal 55 (2006): 179-198.

3, Gigante, Denise. "Facing the ugly: The case of Frankenstein." Elh 67.2 (2000): 565-587.

4, Sherwin, Paul. "Frankenstein: Creation as catastrophe." Pmla96.5 (1981): 883-903.

5, Ziolkowski, Theodore. "Science, Frankenstein, and myth." The Sewanee Review 89.1 (1981): 34-56.

6, Blackledge, Paul. "Reflections on the Marxist theory of history." Reflections on the Marxist theory of history. Manchester University Press, 2013.

7, Rigby, Stephen Henry. "Marxism and history: A critical introduction." Marxism and History. Manchester University Press, 2024.

8, Frow, John. "Marxism and literary history." Ideology. Routledge, 2014. 295-302.

9, Burawoy, Michael, and Erik Olin Wright. "Sociological marxism." Handbook of sociological theory. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. 459-486.

10, Castree, Noel. "Marxism and the production of nature." Capital & Class 24.3 (2000): 5-36.

11, Lukes, Steven. "Marxism and morality." Capital & Class 10.2 (1986): 220-222.

2. Comitini, Patricia. "The Limits of Discourse and the Ideology of Form in Mary Shelley's" Frankenstein"." Keats-Shelley Journal55 (2006): 179-198.

3. Malchow, Howard L. "Frankenstein's monster and images of race in nineteenth-century Britain." Past & Present 139 (1993): 90-130

4. Jones, Jonathan. "Hidden voices: Language and ideology in philosophy of language of the long eighteenth century and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." Textual Practice 19.3 (2005): 265-287.

5. Morton, Timothy. "Frankenstein and ecocriticism." The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein (2016): 143-157.

6. Hyman, Stanley Edgar. "The Marxist Criticism of Literature." The Antioch Review 7.4 (1947): 541-568.

7. Lisman, C. David. "Marxist literary theory: A critique." Journal of Aesthetic Education 22.2 (1988): 73-85.

8. Williams, Raymond. Marxism and literature. Vol. 392. Oxford Paperbacks, 1977.

9. Mulhern, Francis. "Marxism in Literary Criticism." New Left Review 108.1981 (1978): 1991.

10. Allen, Richard. "Reading Frankenstein." The Realist Novel(1995): 63.

Michie E B. Frankenstein and Marx's Theories of Alienated Labor[J]. Approaches to Teaching Shelley's Frankenstein, 1990: 93-98.

​

​Haubrich, M. (1999). The Self-Created Self: A Marxist Critique of Creature Self-Creation in Frankenstein (Vol. 1999, No. 1999). Red Deer College.

​

​Kirejczyk, Jakub. "Early German Romantic and Marxian Theories of Alienation in Frankenstein: Atomizing Effects of Commodification of Nature and Transgressive Science: An Eco-Marxist perspective." (2022).

​

​O'Flinn, Paul. "Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein." Popular Fictions. Routledge, 2013. 196-221.

​

​

McLane, M. N. (1996). Literate Species: Populations," Humanities," and Frankenstein. Elh, 63(4), 959-988.

Malchow, H. L. (1993). Frankenstein's monster and images of race in nineteenth-century Britain. Past & Present, (139), 90-130.

Pollin, B. R. (1965). Philosophical and literary sources of Frankenstein. Comparative Literature, 17(2), 97-108.

O'Flinn, P. (2013). Production and reproduction: The case of Frankenstein. In Popular Fictions (pp. 196-221). Routledge.

Bottomore, T., Harris, L., Kiernan, V. G., & Miliband, R. (1991). The marxist thought. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Jessop, B. (2012). Marxist approaches to power. The Wiley‐Blackwell companion to political sociology, 1-14.

Lukács, G. (1972). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. mit Press.

Eagleton, T. (2006). Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. Verso.

Laclau, E. (2012). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. Verso Books.

Mulhern, F. (2014). Contemporary Marxist literary criticism. Routledge.

Anderson, R. (2002). “Misery Made Me a Fiend”: Social Reproduction in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Robert Owen's Early Writings. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 24(4), 417-438.

Hansen, M. (1997). Not Thus, after All, Would Life Be Given":" Technesis", Technology and the Parody of Romantic Poetics in" Frankenstein. Studies in Romanticism, 36(4), 575-609.

McLane, M. N. (1996). Literate Species: Populations," Humanities," and Frankenstein. Elh, 63(4), 959-988.

Malchow, H. L. (1993). Frankenstein's monster and images of race in nineteenth-century Britain. Past & Present, (139), 90-130.

Hogle, J. E. (2020). The Environments of Frankenstein. Huntington Library Quarterly, 83(4), 643-661.

Ferguson, F. (2010). Generationalizing: Romantic Social Forms and the Case of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 8(1), 97-118.

Michie, E. B. (1988). Production replaces creation: Market forces and Frankenstein as critique of romanticism. Nineteenth Century Contexts, 12(1), 27-33.

2. Burnett, Mark Thornton. "The'fiend-like Queen': Rewriting Lady Macbeth." Parergon 11.1 (1993): 1-19.

3. Kimbrough, R. (1983). Macbeth: The Prisoner of Gender. Shakespeare Studies (Rosemont Publishing & Printing Corporation), 16, 175.

4. Alfar, Cristina LeCheng, Yuhe. "Feminist study of Lady Macbeth." SHS web of conferences. Vol. 158. EDP Sciences, 2023.

5. ón. "" Blood Will Have Blood": Power, Performance, and Lady Macbeth's Gender Trouble." Journal X2.2 (1997): 4.

6. Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E. Women and gender in early modern Europe. Vol. 41. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

7. Lenz, Carolyn Ruth Swift, Gayle Greene, and Carol Thomas Neely, eds. The woman's part: Feminist criticism of Shakespeare. University of Illinois Press, 1980.

8. Jajja, M. Ayub. "A feminist reading of Shakespearean tragedies: frailty, thy name is woman." Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 8.1 (2014): 228-237.

9. MacMullen, Taralyn Adele. The role of Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare's Macbeth: a production thesis in acting. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 2005.

10. Chattopadhyay, Shamba. "THE DUALITY OF DESIRE: LADY MACBETH IN A PATRIARCHAL WORLD."