https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp How do you think the Danielson Framework and teacher effectiveness correlates with these viewpoints? en-us 2017-06-22 15:22:04 UTC 2017-06-27 20:39:58 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588531 I feel that initially Danielson rubric was to be used as a tool to help to create best practice in classrooms, but is now being used as and a tool to evaluate. Danielson does not like how her rubric is now being used in a traditional way.]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:30 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588531 jrjordan1 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588536 I think]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:34 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588536 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588541 I don't believe that Danielson is a progressive movement at all. We are starting to teach to the test!!!! Making sure we cover each criterion to get that 4. ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:38 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588541 rkozak5_3 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588542 2017-06-27 20:34:38 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588542 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588545 Danielson seems like it's more traditional. The standards are all set for the evaluator. There is very little choice. ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:40 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588545 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588558  I think that the Danielson Framework has both elements: Progressive and traditional but now it's being used just to evaluate teachers.

]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:47 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588558 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588559 2017-06-27 20:34:47 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588559 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588560 I think Danielson meant for it to be progressive but it became more traditionalist as people began to interpret it for their own use. ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:47 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588560 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588562 We are always "ranking" students and people...it's just the American way!  This leads to more Traditional, but it missed the "application" and real life skills.  So, we need both...balance. Oops...didn't actually read the subtitle...my response had nothing to do with Danielson.]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:48 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588562 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588564 I don't think the Danielson is progressive. It doesn't allow flexibility within the curriculum. ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:55 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588564 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588566 I believe that the Danielson Framework and Educator Effectiveness are both progressive thinking, but want students to understand the content as well as if teaching were solely traditional. Through blended learning, a happy medium can be reached. That being said, I still struggle with and have frustrations with the system.]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:57 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588566 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588568 EE is a traditional method to evaluate the teachers' methods however progressive ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:59 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588568 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588569 I believe you have to be creative with the way your build your lessons to incorporate the progressive approach.  ]]> 2017-06-27 20:34:59 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588569 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588576 Gives the illusion of choice! 

]]> 2017-06-27 20:35:09 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588576 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588582 For me is more constructivism view of learning: for improvement of teaching;teachers become more thoughtful practitioners.]]> 2017-06-27 20:35:18 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588582 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588589 There are sections for both as you highlight through Danielson]]> 2017-06-27 20:35:25 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588589 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588604 We are evaluated in a traditional format with a rubric and specific criteria but with a progressive "choice" element of what we showcase--and told "no one lives in the land of 4" yet so much is on the line to gain a 4]]> 2017-06-27 20:35:37 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588604 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588620 I think that Danielson tries to be more progressive, but isn't quite totally there. The struggle is that it does't paint a picture of the effectiveness of the teacher.]]> 2017-06-27 20:35:58 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588620 https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588628 I think the Danielson Framework does allow teachers to see areas of improvement, but it is sometimes hard to be evaluated all the time.]]> 2017-06-27 20:36:03 UTC https://padlet.com/ademark/czyetr68mysp/wish/177588628