A. Content

1. Is the main idea clear and relevant to the topic?

2. Are ideas sufficiently explained and supported with examples or details?

3. Are any parts unclear or underdeveloped?

B. Organization

1. Does the essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?

2. Is the thesis statement clear?

3. Does each paragraph have a clear topic sentence?

4. Do ideas follow a logical order?

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Are ideas connected logically?

2. Are transitions and connectors used appropriately?

3. Does the essay flow smoothly from one idea to another?

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Is vocabulary appropriate for academic writing?

2. Are words used accurately and clearly?

3. Are there unnecessary repetitions?

E. Grammar

1. Do grammar errors make meaning difficult to understand?

2. Are verb tenses and sentence structures used correctly?

Important: Peer reviewers are not expected to correct every grammar mistake. The main goal is to help the writer improve clarity, organization, and overall effectiveness.

the essays author: aziza

Peer editor: yagmur ezel

the essay's author:yagmur

my comment: I read Yagmur's essay. I think her essay is clear and easy to understand. I like the ideas and the examples. They support the topic well. I think there are some grammar mistakes.

The Essays Author: Halime Rümeysa Takas.

My comment:

The essay is clear and easy to understand. The causes are explained clearly with good examples. However, some parts use “I” language, which is not suitable for this type of essay. There is also some repetition of words like “important.” In addition, the second body paragraph needs a stronger concluding sentence. Overall, it is a good essay, but it can be improved with more formal language and better word choice.

The essay's writer: Özgürcan İnandım

My comment: The essay is well written and it's a really interesting topic. The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. The ideas are sufficiently explained and supported by examples. None of the parts are unclear or underdeveloped. All of them are well explained.

While Makar’s essay is overall commendable, he could further enhance the cohesion and logical flow of his writing. Additionally, incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary would elevate the quality of his work.

Essays Writer: Yusuf Emre Yıldız

I think his essay is overall well written. Some of the paragraphs are cut too short but they all have a clear topic and they are all following the main idea so you know what he was trying to tell when he was writing his essay.

The essay’s author : Melike Celik

It’s very clear and easy to understand, and I like how she explained the causes of happiness step by step. If i had to suggest something, maybe she could add a few more specific examples or even something personal to make it more interesting. Also, trying different sentence structures or vocabulary could make it even better.

The essay's author : Elif Ece Kayışoğlu

I think she explained the subject quite

successfully and in detail; I liked the way she explained it, everything was explained in order. The cohesion and coherence between sentences are very good . I don't like repetitive sentences, but I really liked that she always used different things

The essay's author: Selin Nas OKCU

The essay is well formed but the word count is not enough, vocabulary is easy for an academic writing and there are not enough transitions and connectors.

The essay's author:Meryem Karayılan

My comment:There is one paragraph missing.It does not have thesis statement.Every paragraph have topic sentence.Connectors are used nicely.Vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing and used well.There are some grammer mistakes.Also the page organization can be fixed.The topic is clear.Overall,the essay nicely written and the mistakes can be fixed.

Peer Editor Barnohon Alyshırova

The Essay Author Aynura Rozyeva

I read my friend's Essay Cause and Effect essay on "Causes of Happiness" is very well-written. I especially liked the hook in the introduction – it was engaging and caught the reader's attention immediately. The background information was clear, the thesis statement was strong, and the causes were explained logically with good examples. The essay flows smoothly with almost no grammar mistakes

The essay’s author: Aylara Babakulyyeva

Her essay has a clear main idea and good organization with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The examples are relevant, but some ideas need more explanation. My feedback is that she can try to improve sentence clarity and grammar, and use more varied vocabulary. Overall, it’s a good and understandable essay.

Peer editor: Neva Melek Balcı

The essay's author: Ismetcan Ayhan

I think the grammar is suitable main idea is clear there is a lot examples about the idea the essay has five paragraphs with a clear introduction body and conclusion the thesis is clear and each paragraph has a clear topic sentence also the ideas follow a logical order transitions and connectors are used appropriately the vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing i think the verb tenses are used correctly.

The essay's author: Alijan Rejepov

The overall cause & effect essay was well structured and had appropriate and relevant information. Even though, there were some grammatical and vocabulary related mistakes, all paragraphs contain a topic sentence and background information. Moreover, essay includes connectors to show causes and effects. Finally,conclusion was restated appropriately.

The essay’s author: Hasret Ozaslan

The introduction part was clear. However, when I read the body parts, I would like to see more examples. The topic was explained well, but the conclusion part could be developed.

Author: Kamila

I think that this essay has a clear main idea and is well organized with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The writer gives relevant reasons for happiness and uses some good examples. However, some ideas need more development, especially in the body paragraphs. There are also grammar and spelling mistakes that should be corrected to make the writing clearer. Overall, it is a good essay, but it can be improved with more detailed support and better language accuracy.

The essay’s author: Nil Gönülkırmaz

My comment:

A. Content

1. Yes, the main idea is clear. The essay is about what causes happiness, and it stays on topic the whole time.

2. Most ideas are explained with examples. For instance, the paragraph about relationships gives good details like emotional support and sharing experiences. But the last paragraph feels a bit short

3. The gratitude paragraph is the weakest. It feels underdeveloped compared to the others.

B. Organization

1. Yes, the essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

2. The thesis is clear: happiness comes from internal mindset and everyday experiences. Good.

3. Each paragraph has a topic sentence. “One important cause…”, “Another key factor…”, “Gratitude also plays…” — all clear.

4. The order is logical and makes sense.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Ideas connect well to each other.

2. Transitions like “Another key factor” and “In conclusion” work nicely. No problems here.

3. The essay flows smoothly. It’s easy to read from beginning to end.

D. Vocabulary

1. The vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing. Words like “meaningful,” “perspective,” “genuine” sound good.

2. Words are used accurately and clearly.

3.

E. Grammar

1. Grammar errors don’t block understanding — the meaning is always clear.

2. Verb tenses are consistent and sentence structures are mostly correct.

Author: Eylül Naz Çelik

My Comment: The essay is easy to follow and understand. The connection between cause and effects are clear. Even though the essay is clear, some words can be changed.

Peer Editor: İlayda Fatma Cantürk

I read Emre's essay, and the main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. Since the ideas are sufficiently explained with supporting examples, the essay remains well developed and clear throughout. It has a distinct introduction, body, and conclusion, with the thesis statement clearly stated in the first paragraph. Every paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence, ensuring that the ideas follow a logical order. Because all points are connected logically and transitions like "in addition" and "for example" are used correctly, the essay flows very smoothly. The vocabulary is also appropriate for academic writing, as words are used accurately without unnecessary repetitions. Finally, any minor grammar errors do not make the text hard to understand because the verb tenses and sentence structures are used correctly. In conclusion, I liked Emre’s essay. It is easy to read and enjoyable.

Author: Şevval Elçi

My comment: I read Şevval's essay. I think her essay is well organized and structured. She explained everything step by step. She used so many examples in her essay. Her essay is very fluent and the conjunctions are used correctly.

The Essay’s Author: Mehmet Baran Sakarya

My Comment: It has total of five paragraphs. It includes introduction, first body paragraph, second body paragraph, third body paragraph, and a conclusion. Word count is over 200 words. The topic is interesting and informative. Overall, it is a well-written essay in my opinion.

The essay’s author: Dilfuza Shayyrova

My comment:

Dilfuza’s essay was clear and well organised.

The introduction part was written well, with all the necessary details such as hook, thesis statement and background information. She organised all three body paragraphs according to her introduction. The transition phrases were also used which was helpful while reading.

I would like to point out that there were some grammatical mistakes and the sentences seemed less complex. She also had to work on her conclusion part because it was a little off topic.

The essay's author: Yusuf Emre Yıldız

My Comment: I think his essay is well written in a logical order. You can understand topic with ease. Every paragraph has topic. Some paragraphs lacks of cause and effect. In overall you can easily understand the whole topic.

The essay’s author: Neva Melek Balci

My comment:

The essay is really understandable and relevant to topic. I didn’t catch any unclear parts.

The organization of the essay is really good all clear and all logical.

For me the vocabulary language is a little bit under for academic writing.

Writer : ceylin yavaş

Overall, the essay is well-organized and presents the main ideas clearly. The structure makes it easy to follow, and the points are expressed in a generally effective way. However, there are a few minor grammatical errors throughout the text. With some careful revision and editing, the essay could become even clearer and more polished.

The essay writer: Barnohon Alyshırova

My comment: My friend's Cause and Effect essay titled "Psychological Causes of Happiness" is very well-written. I especially liked the body paragraphs – they clearly explained the psychological causes with logical order and strong examples. The background information in the introduction was clear. However, I think the conclusion could be slightly more detailed to leave a stronger final impression. Overall, it is still an impressive and well-organized essay.

Writer of the essay:Nisanur Yılmaz

I found your essay to be highly informative, clear, and well-structured. It provides a great deal of insight into the topic. While the overall content is very successful, there are a few minor slips and careless mistakes that could be polished. Aside from those small details, it’s a very strong and engaging piece of writing.

The essay's author: Barno Avezova

The cause and effect essay of my friend is well structured and organized. It has proper introduction as well as relevant background information and topic sentences in all paragraphs. The essay includes connestors which shows coherence between sentences. In conclusion, the concluding paragraph is restated appropriately.

While… (concession)

Therefore… (refutation )

Admittedly, some argue that lying is always unethical and unnecessary, claiming that honesty should be upheld in all situations regardless of the consequences. They suggest that truth builds trust and that even difficult realities should be faced directly rather than avoided through deception. However, this perspective overlooks the complexity of human relationships and emotional well-being. In reality, people often lie to protect others from unnecessary harm, maintain social harmony, or avoid escalating conflicts. For example, small “white lies” can prevent hurt feelings or preserve important relationships without causing lasting damage. Therefore, while absolute honesty may seem ideal in theory, in practice, lying can serve as a practical and sometimes compassionate response to complicated social situations.

First, people have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. Pregnancy involves serious physical and emotional effects, and forcing someone to continue it removes their freedom of choice. Second, banning abortion does not stop it—it only makes it dangerous. Without legal access, people may turn to unsafe procedures that risk their lives.

Opponents argue that abortion is immoral because life begins at conception. This concern is valid and reflects respect for life. However, it does not outweigh the rights and safety of the pregnant person, who must carry the burden.

In conclusion, abortion has to be legal to protect freedom and ensure safe medical care.

Admittedly, these technologies can inadvertently promote skimming and keyword scanning rather than sustained, focused reading.

Nevertheless, this limitation arises primarily from user practices rather than inherent flaws in the technology itself. When employed judiciously—for instance, to locate relevant passages prior to close, offline analysis—digital tools augment rather than undermine academic reading.

Therefore, I maintain that digital tools are beneficial for scholarly work when used with intentionality and discipline, and their potential negative effects can be effectively mitigated through appropriate training and self-regulation.

Beyond environmental benefits, a transition to renewable energy provides a critical shield against geopolitical instability. Currently, global economies are at the mercy of volatile oil and gas prices, which fluctuate wildly due to foreign conflicts and supply chain disruptions. By harnessing domestic wind, solar, and geothermal power, a nation can achieve true energy sovereignty. This shift decentralizes the power grid and ensures that the cost of electricity is dictated by local infrastructure and technology rather than the unpredictable whims of international cartels or overseas wars. In the long run, this stability creates a more predictable environment for both businesses and households.

Counter-Argument & Concession

Opponents of a rapid green transition argue that the intermittent nature of renewable energy—the fact that the sun does not always shine and the wind does not always blow—makes it an unreliable foundation for a modern power grid. They contend that the "intermittency gap" could lead to frequent blackouts or a reliance on expensive battery storage that is not yet scalable. It is certainly true that our current infrastructure was built for the steady, 24/7 combustion of fossil fuels, and transitioning to a variable energy source presents significant engineering and logistical hurdles that cannot be ignored.

Refutation

However, this argument fails to account for the rapid advancements in smart-grid technology and diversified energy portfolios. While a single solar farm may be intermittent, a nationwide "super-grid" that connects wind from the coasts, solar from the deserts, and hydroelectric power from the north can balance supply and demand in real-time. Furthermore, the cost of industrial-scale lithium-ion and solid-state batteries has plummeted by over 80% in the last decade, making storage a viable reality rather than a futuristic dream. Relying on the "unreliability" argument is a dated perspective that ignores the current pace of innovation; the risk is no longer in the technology’s failure, but in our hesitation to implement it.

Online education has become increasingly common, especially after the pandemic. While some argue that it is as effective as traditional education, it is not fully equivalent due to differences in interaction, discipline, and social experience.

One major advantage of online education is flexibility. Students can access lessons anytime and learn at their own pace, which is especially helpful for working individuals. However, this freedom often leads to poor time management and reduced motivation.

Supporters claim that online education can be as effective as face-to-face learning when supported by technology. Conceding this point, online platforms do offer interactive tools such as live classes and group work. However, these interactions remain limited. Refuting this idea, real-time communication and deeper engagement are much stronger in physical classrooms.

In addition, face-to-face education provides better social and emotional development. Students build relationships, improve communication skills, and learn through direct interaction. These experiences are difficult to fully achieve in an online setting.

In conclusion, although online education offers flexibility and useful tools, it cannot fully replace the interaction and personal development provided by face-to-face education. Therefore, it should be seen as a supportive alternative rather than an equal one.

​However, many find success through Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which addresses the root causes by reshaping thought patterns. Lifestyle changes—such as mindfulness and regular exercise—also play a significant role. Ultimately, while medication can be life-changing for some, others heal effectively using only therapeutic and holistic strategies. The best approach depends on the individual's unique needs and professional guidance.

it is true that harmful content exists on social media and Türkiye has the right to fight misinformation and threats. No country should allow dangerous lies to spread freely

However a full ban is too extreme and hurts innocent people. Instead of blocking everything, the government could remove only illegal posts or work with platforms to add fact checkers. many countries use these methods without shutting down all access a ban punishes everyone for the actions of a few which is unfair. thus the need for safety does not justify taking away basic freedoms

The question of whether euthanasia should be legal is a very difficult and emotional topic. Some people think that euthanasia should be legal because its main purpose is to end a patient’s extreme physical pain. This idea may be true because many terminal patients suffer a lot every day and, unfortunately, have no hope of medical recovery. They believe dying with dignity is a human right. However, others argue that euthanasia should not be allowed. They believe it is not right to end a human life under any circumstances. Furthermore, they suggest that there may be other medical treatments or better psychological support to help patients manage their pain without ending their lives.

• Summarizes the categories

• Restates the thesis in different words

• Explains why the classification is useful or important

Body Paragraphs

Each body paragraph should focus on one distinct category. Start with a clear topic sentence that identifies the category being discussed. Follow this with a detailed description of the category’s characteristics to show what makes it unique. You must provide concrete examples for every category to ensure the reader understands the classification. Remember to use transition words (e.g., "The first category," "Another type," "In contrast") to guide the reader smoothly from one category to the next and keep your argument coherent.

Conclusion

The conclusion serves to wrap up the essay by synthesizing your findings. Do not simply list the categories again; instead, explain how these groups contribute to a deeper, unified understanding of the entire topic. You should emphasize why your method of classification is useful and offer a final insight or a broader takeaway about the subject. This is your chance to leave the reader with a clear perspective on why this specific way of categorizing the topic matters.

1. Way more data 📊
Phones, apps, social media, online shopping → massive data to train AI.
No data = no AI. Now we have too much.

2. Huge computing power 💻
Cloud + GPUs made training models fast and cheaper.
Before, it took months. Now it can take hours or days.

3. Breakthroughs in deep learning 🧠
New techniques (like transformers) suddenly made AI actually good at language, images, etc.

4. Big money from companies 💰
Companies like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI poured billions into AI → rapid progress.

5. Real-world usefulness 🚀
AI stopped being “cool experiment” and became:

• Chatbots

• Recommendation systems (Netflix, Spotify)

• Self-driving tech

• Fraud detection

Businesses saw profit → demand exploded.

6. Viral tools changed everything 🌍
When tools like ChatGPT came out, normal people started using AI daily → huge adoption spike.

I hope you are doing well. My name is [Your Name], and I am a student in your [Course Name] class.

I am writing to ask about [your question—e.g., the assignment deadline / a topic from class / an exam detail]. I would really appreciate it if you could clarify [specific point].

Thank you for your time and help.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

Author of the essay: Atageldi Gurbanov

My friend's essay about the benefits of AI based technologies on society is well structured. All the paragraphs have relevant to each other information. However, there is a little complexity in organization with counter argument,concession and refutation. Other than them the essay remains well.

The essay’s author: Selin Nas OKCU

The essay is well formed, the content is cleat and relevant to the topic, everything is clear and supported with details. The organisation is in the right order, ideas are connected logically.

There are no significant vocabulary or  grammar errors instead of one mistake.

The essay’s author: Eylül Çelik

The essay is well structured and easy to follow. The ideas are clear . Each paragraph supports the main argument with relevant examples and explanations. The organization is logical, and the transitions between ideas are smooth. In addition, the language is mostly accurate with only a one or two minor mistakes. Overall, it is a strong and effective essay, but it could be improved by adding more examples and making corrections of grammatical mistakes.

The essay's author: Mehri Annamuratova

Honestly, I can see that this essay is well-written and clearly organized. The introduction provides a clear background and effectively presents the writer’s opinion. The ideas are expressed in a thoughtful and controlled manner. I found the third body paragraph particularly effective, especially the point that AI will not replace our jobs, which I strongly agree with. Overall, the essay is coherent and well-structured.

The essay's author: Atageldi Gurbanov

Overall, this essay presents clear and meaningful ideas about AI. Also the writer explores both sides of the topic, which makes it more interesting and thoughtful. I especially like the focus on efficiency and innovation. The essay shows good potential and a strong understanding of the topic.

In English, multiple adjectives preceding a noun follow a specific, generally inviolable order: Opinion, Size, Age, Shape, Color, Origin, Material, and Purpose. A common acronym is OASCOMP.

1. Yes it is

2. Yes it is

3. No.

1. Yes. It has clear parts

2. Yes.

3. Yes the paragraphs all have clear topic sentences

4. Yes they follow a logical order.

1. Yes they are connected logically

2. Yes they're used appropriately

3. Yes it smoothly flows

D. 1. Yes it's appropriate and valid

2. Yes

3. No there isnt any repetitions

E

1. No they don't

2. Yes they are used correctly

peer editor : mina ercan

1. Main idea is clear and in unity with the essay

2. Yes, in body porgaphs, the idea is explained and supported

with examples.

3. All aspects mentioned in the thesis and explained clearly.

4, Yes, paragraphs start and finish accordingly to their role.

5. Thesis statement mentions both the advantages and disadvantages of the topics later explained in body paragraphs   

6. They are clear.

7. The essay is written in a logical order.

8. Yes, they are connected without creating confusion.

9. The connection and logical order is satisfying overall.

10. Vocabulary is appropriate and clear. There one no repetitions.

11. There aren't any grammatical errors.

Peer editor: Ismetcan Ayhan

The hook in the introduction explains the topic clearly and effectively. The word choices in the body paragraphs are simple, understandable, and well-written. Describing the given headings adds a nice touch to the writing. Generally, the essay is clear and progresses in a coordinated and logical way.

Peer Editor: Selin Nas Okcu

The content is relevant to the topic, it is clear and flows. It can need more specific examples or supporting details because sentences are a little basic and can be improved. The organization is great and ideas are connected logically. Transitions and connectors are used correctly. Vocabulary use can be improved by using more academic words. I didn’t see any grammatical mistake.

writer: neva melek balci

peer editor: eylul naz celik

The main idea is relevant to the topic

All ideas are explained and supported with details.

There are no unclear or underdeveloped parts.

The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

The thesis statement is clear.

Topic sentences are clear.

Ideas follow a logical order

Ideas are connected logically and the essay flows smoothly.

Transitions snd connector are used appropriately.

There is no problem with the vocabulary use.

There are no grammar mistakes.

Writer: Mahri Annamuradova

Title: Categories for vacation planning

The classification essay about vacation planning written by my friend is well structured. The introduction classified categories for vacation planning. Each body paragraph explained a different category smoothly. There were used relevant vocabulary, connectors and information. Overall, if not to count a grammar mistake, the essay is academicly appropriate.

Peer Editor: Mina Ercan

1. The main idea is clear and coherent.

2. There are enough details and examples that make it easier to comprehend the topic.

3. Each topic is explained in detail with examples, nothing is underdeveloped.

4. The parts of the essay are clear and they follow a logical order.

5. Vocabulary may need some enhancements, using more advanced words instead of "very" can help the essay look more academic.

Author: Emre Çelik

A. Content

1. Is the main idea clear and relevant to the topic? Yes, it is very clear and relevant to the topic.

2. Are ideas sufficiently explained and supported with examples or details? Yes, the author explains everything clearly

3. Are any parts unclear or underdeveloped? No, all parts are perfectly clear.

B. Organization

1. Does the essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?

Yes, the essay has a clear introduction, body and conclusion.

2. Is the thesis statement clear? Yes, it is clear.

3. Does each paragraph have a clear topic sentence? Yes, all of them have a clear topic sentence.

4. Do ideas follow a logical order? Yes, they do.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Are ideas connected logically? Yes, they are connected logically.

2. Are transitions and connectors used appropriately? Yes, they are used appropriately.

3. Does the essay flow smoothly from one idea to another? Yes, it does flow smoothly.

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Is vocabulary appropriate for academic writing? Yes, it is appropriate for acafemic writing.

2. Are words used accurately and clearly? Yes, the words are used correctly.

3. Are there unnecessary repetitions? No, there are not unnecessary repetitions.

E. Grammar

1. Do grammar errors make meaning difficult to understand? No, they do not make meaning difficult to understand

2. Are verb tenses and sentence structures used correctly? Yes, they are used correctly.

Peer: Beyza Enki

• Main idea is clearly stated.

• On body paragraphs the idea is explained and supported with examples.

• All paragraphs have topic sentence and thesis statement is clear.

• More conjuctions can be used.

• Vocabulary is appropriate.

• There is no unnecessary repeating.

• There are a few simple grammer mistakes.

• In conclusion the thesis statement is restated.

Peer Editor: Aziza Umbarova

My feedback: The classification essay has a clear and understandable structure. The main idea, examples, and details support the topic well. The body paragraphs are organized smoothly, and the vocabulary is appropriate and effective.

However, there are some unnecessary details and a few off-topic sentences. Aside from these minor mistakes, the essay is suitable for a classification essay and meets the main requirements.

Peer editor: Aylara

Content: The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. The essay explains the three types of animals with good examples and enough supporting details. However, some parts could include a little more explanation to make the information more interesting.

Organization: The essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The thesis statement is understandable, and each paragraph focuses on one type of animal. The ideas are presented in a logical order.

Cohesion and Coherence: The essay flows smoothly from one paragraph to another. Transitions and connectors are used appropriately, which helps connect the ideas clearly.

Vocabulary Use: The vocabulary is suitable for academic writing and easy to understand. Most words are used correctly, although there is some repetition of words like “animals” and “examples.”

Grammar: Grammar mistakes do not make the essay difficult to understand. Sentence structures and verb tenses are mostly correct, but a few sentences could be more varied. Overall, the essay is clear and effective.

Peer Editor: Mehri Annamuradova

Great job on her draft! The categories make sense and follow the five-paragraph structure perfectly. Maybe it needs to double- check the gerund and infinitives in the third paragraph just to make sure they match the checklist. Also, nice use of transitions like " First" and " Second". Nice work!

peer editor neva melek balcı

a)

1.yes it is relevant

2.yes there are examples supported with details

3.no i dont think so

b)

1.yes it does

2.the thesis is clear

3.yes the topic sentences are there

4.yes they do

c)

1.yes

2.yes but there are a few of them

3.yes

d)

1.i think it is appropriate

2.yes

3.yes the topic sentences are very similar

e)

1. no it’s easy to understand

2.mostly yes

Writer: Aylara

A. The main idea clear and relevant to the topic.

B. The essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

C. The essay flows smoothly from one paragraph to another, but try to use transitions like “Firstly”, “Next”.

D. Use a wider range vocabulary instead of repeating simple word like “group” “animal”.

E. There is a little grammar mistake, but it doesn’t make meaning difficult to understand.

The conclusions could be slightly stronger.

Overall, the essay is clear, organized and easy to understand.

Peer editor : Atageldı Gurbanov

The argumentative essay of my friend is well structured. It has the thesis statement that takes a clear position. Additionally, body paragraphs include reasons to support position. There are relevant connectors and well grammar usage. Except some grammar and content mistakes, overall essay is academically right.

Peer editor: Ismetcan Ayhan

The main idea is clear and understandable, but the hook could be improved. Overall, the flow of the sentences is clear and easy to follow. The word choices are simple and understandable, perhaps more academic vocabulary could have been used, but the flow and clarity are still good. In general, the ideas in the essay are clearly and logically presented, and the essay progresses in a coordinated way.

Peer Editör: Emre ÇELİK

A. Content

1. The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic.

2. Ideas are explained, but more examples could be added.

3. The parts about “fun friends” and “situational friends” could be more developed.

B. Organization

1. The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

2. The thesis statement is understandable but could be stronger.

3. Most paragraphs have a clear topic sentence.

4. Ideas follow a logical order.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Ideas are generally connected logically.

2. More transition words could be used (such as “Moreover” or “For example”).

3. The essay flows fairly smoothly, but some sentences could connect better.

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Vocabulary is appropriate and clear.

2. Some words are repeated too often (“friends,” “friendship”).

3. More academic vocabulary could be used.

E. Grammar

1. Grammar mistakes do not make the essay difficult to understand.

2. Some sentence structures and article/preposition uses need improvement.

3. There are a few spelling and punctuation mistakes.

Peer Editor: Selin Nas Okcu

The main idea is relevant to the topic. Examples and supported details can be more. The essay is clear and ideas follow a logical order. The essay flows smoothly. Transitions and connectors are used appropriately. There is no problem with the vocabulary or grammar use.

Writer:Alijan Rejepov

Your essay's has good ideas and Clear examples about fruits,vegetables and starches.I like how you shared your personal experience because it makes the essay more interesting.However,there are many grammar and spelling mistakes,so you should check your sentences carefully.Also,some transitions between paragraphs can be smoother. You have a clear conclusion and you summarize main idea well.