<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Questions to Editors of the RCR Workshop on Peer Review by W delaimy</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b</link>
      <description>Attendees discussion</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-10-08 05:26:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-22 07:47:56 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is it true that journals assign only 15% quota for publications that originate from the developing countries?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144608744</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>In many times, journals reject papers because they claim that the paper does not add to the body of knowledge though the knowledge gained from the study is new in the context of its population/country, how to overcome this barrier to papers' acceptance?<br><br>Rana F. Obeidat</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 06:00:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144608744</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144715363</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Many editorial  immediate rejection decisions include the following statement" your work is interesting and it is a well written manuscript  that is relevant but we select only 25% of the top submisions". This is done without a peer review evaluation chance. So what is the basis for this rejection. Amal Al Bakri</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:00:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144715363</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144726853</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer review is a tedious lengthy process. Has this process been evaluated for its effectiveness in detecting academic and scientific errors? Amal Al Bakri</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:07:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144726853</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144730872</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In multidisciplinary publications what are the steps taken to  make sure tbat all aspects of the scientific work have been properly evaluated? Amal Al Bakri</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:09:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144730872</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144734317</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After a peer review process some reviewers suggest adding more references that sometimes include their own work. What do you think about this? Amal am bakri </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:11:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144734317</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144738185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most authors are affiliated to higher education institute. Is it acceptable for an author to be from the public ( open science) with no particular affiliation or from school. Amal al bakri </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:13:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144738185</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144744165</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Contributionship is a growing requirement for authorship. Are there any steps during the review process to revise the claimed contribution to the submitted work? Amal Al Bakri </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:16:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144744165</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144757403</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Post publication peer review <br><br>What is meant by post evaluation peer review and is it adapted by the scientific community?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:23:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144757403</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Initial Editorial process </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144776556</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Why it might take so long for a manuscript to receive the initial judgment? It’s already 7 weeks that my manuscript status is still ‘with editor’...don’t you think this is an ethical issue considering I cannot do a lot except for waiting and eventually send a reminder?<br>Thanks<br>Oriana Awwad<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 07:33:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1144776556</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Could the rvieweres be not qualified well to review  and may does a mistakes in the reviwing?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145173582</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 10:55:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145173582</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>contacting editors before submission</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145174650</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>does it improve our chances of publication if we contact the editor to see if they interested in our subject?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 10:56:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145174650</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Could the rvieweres be not qualified well to review  and may does a mistakes in the reviwing?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145176753</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 10:57:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145176753</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145184684</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>journal ask for reviewers during submission. do they send the article submitted to the reviewers suggested by the author or do they use the suggested reviewers for other articles?<br> </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 11:01:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145184684</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145870479</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How to maximize manuscript's chance of acceptance especially for beginner researchers? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 17:15:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1145870479</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hard decisions</title>
         <author>alaaabouelfetouh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146222695</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I am an associate editor at a certain journal and sometimes find it difficult to decide whether an article is within the scope of the journal. An editorial board member advised me that if it is not clearly out of scope to send it to reviewers. What would be your advice?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 20:16:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146222695</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Poor language</title>
         <author>alaaabouelfetouh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146227500</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If an article is poorly written or needs English editing, would you send it to authors for revision before considering it?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 20:19:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146227500</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Articles with revisions</title>
         <author>alaaabouelfetouh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146230267</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Would you reject an article that received an initial recommendation of revision if the authors responded partially or unconvincingly to the reviewers comments? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-01-31 20:20:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1146230267</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Fadia Mayyas</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1149354982</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How to choose suggested reviewers for a paper?<br>What do editors look for in the initial evaluation of a research paper to be sent to external reviewers?</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2021-02-01 15:48:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1149354982</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Transferred articles</title>
         <author>alaaabouelfetouh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1150423354</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When an article has been rejected at a certain journal, the authors are sometimes offered the chance to transfer to another journal by the same publisher. Does a transferred paper have higher odds of being accepted than a direct submission? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-01 18:53:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1150423354</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Many journals follow a single blinded review process, where the reviewers get to know the authors but not vice versa. What benefit would it bring to the review process to make the authors known to the reviewers? Wouldn&#39;t it be fairer to make the review process double blinded?</title>
         <author>wisamyejo</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1153189142</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 12:02:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wdelaimy/cwda4dcsvd6y8l4b/wish/1153189142</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
