Marbury v Madison by Gabrielle Concepcion https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6 Made with fortitude en-us 2019-02-14 03:52:55 UTC 2019-02-19 16:21:29 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Watchclock.png Do you agree with the decision the Congress did not have power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation because Supremacy Clause places the Constitution before the laws? Explain 04gconcepcion https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/331142110 2019-02-14 03:57:41 UTC https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/331142110 allie https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/331781131 Yes because he was already chosen. Also the people reviewed the Constitution and because of Judicial Review he gets to still take the oath even though Jefferson became president before he took the oath.

]]> 2019-02-15 15:50:07 UTC https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/331781131 Aidan https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/332768178 I agree that Congress shouldn't have had that power, as it did clash with the US Constitution, and led to Judicial Review being a necessity to the Marbury v Madison case. The Supremacy Clause is also put into effect for this reason added on, and it proves its effectiveness by having normal legislation deflected from being utilized.]]> 2019-02-19 16:18:31 UTC https://padlet.com/04gconcepcion/cullw2q7mjj6/wish/332768178