https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s Made with ♥ en-us 2020-02-03 19:13:33 UTC 2020-02-04 17:35:58 UTC hello@padlet.com jacqueline_peterson https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/439874546 Geoengineering solution = Create a sunshade for the Earth using tiny robots that deflect the sunlight to essentially "cool" the Earth. 
Opposing viewpoint = This would cost trillions and would eventually breakdown due to CO2 emissions. ]]> 2020-02-03 19:15:19 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/439874546 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440430785 Geoengineering solution= Spraying sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere could reduce the earth's absorbtion of sunlight and promptly plantenary cooling. 

Opposing Viewpoint= This could spread harmful chemicals, not work or do the opposite of what its supposed to do and/or cost alot of money. 


]]> 2020-02-04 17:19:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440430785 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431045 The solution for Geoengineering: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) a machine that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere which reduces warming in the earth. It involves burning biomass for energy and then captures and stores the emissions underground. The  IPCC has doubts about whether it could be upscaled in time. But also there is disagreement on the availability of land for biomass plantations, and the project is expensive and energy-intensive.  ]]> 2020-02-04 17:20:12 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431045 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431218 solution - eliminate the burning of fossil fuel, and coal, and eventually natural gas. 
opposing-Drive up the price of food and lead to forest destruction.]]> 2020-02-04 17:20:26 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431218 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431263 Geoengineering Solution = Creating a sunshade for the earth using microdots that would reflect the sunlight cool the earth in a sense
Opposing Viewpoint= this wouldnt be worth it because it would take many and many years to accomplish and trillions worth of dollars.

]]> 2020-02-04 17:20:29 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431263 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431338 Geoengineering solution= Caldeira is talking about the easiest, cheapest form of geoengineering: building a sunshade in the stratosphere out of millions of tons of tiny reflective particles, such as sulfate.
opposing viewpoint= “essentially free compared with the other costs of mitigating climate change.”

]]> 2020-02-04 17:20:36 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440431338 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440432373
Some Methods to help climate change by Geo engendering is to reduce heat-trapping clouds, sending a giant sunshade up into orbit or releasing aerosols into the stratosphere.
Although these technologies could theoretically lower global warming, they do not reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and, therefore, would not be able to directly address problems ]]> 2020-02-04 17:21:50 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440432373 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440432980 Problem-Green House Gasses trap solar energy in the atmosphere and heat up the planet
Solution-Pour gasses into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space in order to cool the Earth
Disagreement- "You're in an arena with a big bear, (the bear is climate change) and the question is: should you throw a lion in the arena? You know, maybe they'll fight each other, or maybe they'll just both kill you." -Jonathan Proctor Agricultural Economist, UC Berkeley ]]> 2020-02-04 17:22:38 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440432980 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440436197 A method to help global warming, is geoengineering to put SO2 into the stratosphere. This will cause the same effect as to when volcanos explode and will help to cool the planet down. This is one of the most possible and affordable methods and it works. 
Opposing viewpoint- This method to reduce global warming can cause lack of rainfall, will negativly impact ecosystems, this will also cause the sky to look weird. Just because its effective to one problem, doesn't mean it won't make other problems worse. ]]> 2020-02-04 17:26:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440436197 https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440438511 solar geo-engineering’s consequences will override its benefits. Proctor and his colleagues find that spraying volcanic gas into the air will reduce global temperatures, aiding crops. But those same gases will also scatter sunlight and reduce the amount of radiation that reaches the surface, hampering photosynthesis.]]> 2020-02-04 17:30:06 UTC https://padlet.com/jacqueline_peterson/ct7hi2rn8e1s/wish/440438511