💬 We’d love to hear your thoughts! by SIWEN HUANG

2025-10-22 16:51:06 UTC

I have only an HSK 1 certification, so I don't know a lot about chinese characters, but I found the test to be easy in completing, everything worked ok (video and audio). It wasn't very long, so I didn't get bored. Thank you.

2025-10-27 05:57:19 UTC

I believe that expanding the use of computer-based tests would be very attractive to a greater number of applicants. I think the test is acceptable—not too difficult or too easy. However, I believe the main problem lies with the materials, as the syllabus is a bit outdated, I think, and the exam content is somewhat different from what is available in the practice book. In my opinion, it would be better to update the syllabus to better align with the exams.

2025-11-11 09:04:30 UTC

It was a very interesting test.

Since I am Japanese, even if I didn’t know the meaning of a certain Chinese character, I was able to make some guesses about its meaning based on its composition and structure.

In the latter section the description included the phrase “new Chinese characters,” so I wasn’t sure whether that meant genuinely newly created kanji that exist in reality or fictional characters like those in the earlier section; however, as I proceeded with the responses I found out that they are kanji that actually exist. (In any case, this did not affect the answers.)
Everything loaded correctly.
The length was just right.
As I noted in 1., there were some expressions that were hard to understand due to the translation, so I thought it might be better to make the explanations longer so they remain clear even after translation.