<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Rhetorical Analysis  by Staff.Jennifer Young</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3</link>
      <description>Made with a lightning strike of genius</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-02-19 18:17:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-09-17 08:55:13 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Chris and Ella</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448228639</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses the word "inhuman" to respectfully show the audience that sainthood is not something to achieve.  This allows the audience to relate to the concept that human error is a natural aspect to being human. This helps Orwell relay his opinion because he is indeed human. Making flaws himself, allows the reader to realize everyone is flawed and human.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:34:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448228639</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alison Lindstrom</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448230019</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses the word "inhuman" to describe the depth of sainthood's consequences. This word has a powerfully negative connotation, and it allows Orwell to develop a passionate, severe tone. By appealing to the reader's own humanity, Gandhi's practices are seen as extreme, and a defiance of what it is to be a human. This delicate word choice establishes Orwell's argument as relevant and compelling, drawing the reader into his future statements.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:36:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448230019</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ira and Cooper</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448232212</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By utilizing powerful diction, such as the word "inhuman", Orwell creates a negative connotation around sainthood. This makes the audience view Gandhi and sainthood as an unrealistic ideal for one to pursue. It furthers his argument by allowing the audience to relate to the fact that all humans are imperfect. The utilization of powerful diction creates an empathetic mood from the reader.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:39:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448232212</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chris and Ella </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448232308</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By respecting Gandi's points, the audience can see that Orwell isn't tarnishing Gandi's own credibility. This gives the reader a general idea of the amount of respect orwell has for Gandi even though he doesn't agree with his methods. Allowing the audience see and understand how Orwell turly feels towards Gandi. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:39:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448232308</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anisha and Daniela</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448234635</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Using the word "inhuman" creates a negative connotation around sainthood. This makes the audience view sainthood as unrealistic. This makes Orwell's argument seem more achievable and practical.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:42:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448234635</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ira and Cooper</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448234819</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell respectfully analyzes and agrees with some of Gandhi's ideas by utilizing a candid tone. This enables him to prove to the audience that he is fully knowledgeable about Gandhi's ideas and that he is not merely seeking to criticize him. This allows him to effectively persuade the audience by establishing himself as a diplomatic writer. By establishing himself as a credible writer, the audience is naturally inclined to believe his views towards Gandhi's ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:42:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448234819</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anisha and Daniela </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448235863</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>With the details of Gandhi willing to let his wife or children die, it shows that Gandhi values sainthood more than the lives of others. This detail affects the audience's mind by changing their view on Gandhi sainthood. It creates a negative view of sainthood that can not be achieved without inhumane actions. This helps build Orwell's argument by showing that sainthood can only be achieved by committing sins.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:43:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448235863</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alison Lindstrom</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448236810</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell describes Gandhi's points as ,"unquestionably true" (Orwell), and this word choice develops his tone as diplomatic, and respectful. By acknowledging Gandhi's validity, Orwell creates a platform for respectful, but candid argumentation. His restrained tone re-assures the reader of his dignity and sincerity when addressing the widely-revered Gandhi. Naturally, the reader is more open to Orwell's future claims, because he has built his image as a writer off of decency and respect. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:44:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448236810</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oceana Covington</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448237618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By using the word 'inhuman' to describe sainthood, Orwell illustrates the almost impossible nature of sainthood and appeals to the audience's feelings of inadequacy due to sins. This appeal   by Orwell leads the audience to see Gandhi and sainthood in a negative light, persuading them that sainthood is an extreme that should be avoided, not sought for or treasured. This strengthens Orwell's argument.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:46:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448237618</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anisha and Daniela</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448238138</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Acknowledging Gandhi points shows that Orwell put in the time to do the research on Gandhi. This build credibility because it shows he isn't writing to ridicule Gandhi. The audience starts to respect him because he takes the time to show that Gandhi isn't wrong about  everything and has some good points. Overall, this adds to his argument because it drives the reader to see what Orwell has to say next.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:46:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448238138</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ira and Cooper</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448238675</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By including this detail, Orwell shows how far Gandhi was willing to go in order to achieve sainthood.  The audience sees these details and understands that achieving sainthood would need one to cross a line that most would never want to cross.  It makes the audience realize that Gandhi's "sainthood" isn't as perfect as it may seem.  This strengthens Orwell's argument by proving to the reader that the normal human would not be willing to achieve sainthood. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:47:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448238675</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alison Lindstrom</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448240709</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell includes the important detail, "Gandhi was willing to let his wife or child die to uphold his sainthood" (Orwell), to explain to the severity of sainthood. This blunt claim reveals the extreme nature of sainthood. By appealing to the reader's own familial attachments, Orwell adds relevance and emotional power to his statements. He creates an almost pleading tone, and invokes emotional connection in the reader to his argument. Not only does Orwell show the severe consequences of sainthood with this claim, he links these consequences to the concept of human attachment and relationships, which creates an element of reader-involvement in his argument.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:50:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448240709</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ella and Chris</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448241647</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By adding this detail, Gandhi was willing to go so far to achieve sainthood. This effects the mind of the reader because it exemplifies sainthood is achievable, but by only extreme actions. Orwell adds this in to build his argument that reaching sainthood requires sin. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:51:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448241647</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nancy, Audrey, and Lydia</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448245552</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses the word "inhuman" to describe sainthood, creating a visible oxymoron. Using inhuman allows Orwell create a more visceral connection with the audience, changing how sainthood could originally be seen in the audiences eyes. It changes it from something considered perfection, to something of almost monstrous qualities. The use of inhuman adds to Orwell's argument by using charged diction to  create an emotional connection with the audience. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 18:56:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448245552</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nancy, Audrey and Lydia</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448252817</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By praising his 'adversary' Orwell allows himself to be seen as humble and trustworthy because providing positive reinforcement to the opposition shows his respect towards Gandhi. His use of ethos affects the audience by establishing himself as a credible resource. This adds to the argument by further proving himself to be a respectable source, and solidifying his opinion in the audiences minds. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:06:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448252817</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oceana Covington</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448256380</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In validating Gandhi's points stating they are "unquestionably true", Orwell demonstrates that he respects and acknowledges Gandhi's opposing position, showing he is trustworthy. This helps the audience trust and respect Orwell because he has shown that he has carefully considered the topic he is arguing, creating an effect of being knowledgeable(building trust). This trust and credibility that Orwell gains from the audience strengthens Orwell's believability and, therefore, the chance of the audience being persuaded to his side. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:10:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448256380</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nancy, Audrey, Lydia</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448257672</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Death is a terrifying event to a large majority of people, and saying that someone is willing to let their loved ones die because of a perfectionist belief places Gandhi into a negative light. It portrays Gandhi, a widely respected figure, as someone who would let people suffer just to uphold their own values. This furthers Orwell's argument by drawing audience opinion away from Gandhi and consecutively, towards himself. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:12:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448257672</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oceana Covington</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448261864</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:18:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448261864</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Shiva Rudra &amp; Nishanth Pallapu</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448264683</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The word "inhuman" portrays Gandhi's sainthood in a negative light in order to convince his audience that making mistakes as a human is better than sainthood. It strengthens Orwell's argument by making the audience see that making faults is part of being human and surviving.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:22:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448264683</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marat  </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448264892</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses this diction at the right and place which makes it powerful which in turn affected the audiences viewpoints on becoming perfect and pointing out flaws in Gandhi viewpoints if the audience believes in it. In the end it was very effective in changing my ideas about Gandhi.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:22:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448264892</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ryan &amp; Emma</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448265351</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:23:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448265351</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ethan Lindquist</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448265494</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell builds his own credibility as an author by respecting Gandhi's ideas towards the beginning of his argument. Because he is arguing against a well-known and revered man such as Gandhi, Orwell wants to make it clearly acknowledge his opposition in an appropriate manner. This allows him to later to disagree with some of the points Gandhi made in his autobiography with a stance of professionalism. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:23:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448265494</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Isaac</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268333</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Inhuman: lacking human qualities of compassion and mercy; cruel. <br>Orwell uses diction by labeling sainthood as inhuman. After using the example discussing the way Gandhi refused to give certain medicine to members of his family. By using this example, Orwell helps the audience relate to this example, and reflect on their opinion</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:28:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268333</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ryan &amp; Emma</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268348</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell builds ethos when he validates several of Gandhi's points stating that they are "unquestionably true". This gives Orwell credibility by showing to the audience that Orwell knows what he is talking about, as well as making him seem more professional. This affects the audience by making them more likely to trust Orwell, allowing him to lead farther with his ideas he is trying to express.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:28:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268348</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nishanth P. and Shiva R.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268372</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When he states that some parts of Gandhi's autobiography are "unquestionable true", He establishes his own credibility because he has read the autobiography himself and validated the referenced points which may also oppose him. It also gives him some professionalism as he does not address the book only to criticize it, but to analyze a key point. It lets the audience trust him and be more open to his points. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:28:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268372</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Shiva Rudra and Nishanth Pallapu</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268387</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell includes this detail to signify the negative effects of sainthood, and to sway the audience into his favor by introducing his counterclaim after this statement. This further builds onto his argument by mentioning the bonds between Gandhi and his family, and how easily they are broken. Orwell appeals to his audience by showing the lack of empathy between Gandhi and his family.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:28:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448268387</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ryan &amp; Emma</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448270063</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell includes the important detail that "Gandhi was willing to let his wife or child die" to uphold his sainthood. This is an important detail as it makes Gandhi and his side seem overly-rational and unconcerned for the well-being of others. Painting Gandhi in a negative light makes Orwell's side of the argument seem far more logical and reasonable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:31:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448270063</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Romeo and Morgaine</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448286806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Using the word choice inhuman to describe sainthood portrays that seeking perfection is unrealistic. The use of the word doesn't disrespect Gandhi's morals and ideas but makes the audience see a different point of view. The word choice of inhuman properly strengthens Orwell's argument but at the same time doesn't dishonor Gandhi's reputation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 19:58:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448286806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Taylor and Raelynn</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289147</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By describing sainthood as "inhuman," Orwell characterizes sainthood in a way that disagrees with the values of humanity and the imperfections that humans share. This causes the reader to feel disgusted and unapproving of the values of sainthood, because it seems irrational.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:02:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289147</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>David and Anthony</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289296</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By carefully choosing sublte yet effective diction to characterize  the inhumanity of sainthood, Orwell is able to establish an opinion on sainthood through a gradually developed tone. This minimal way of indirectly stating how Orwell feels about sainthood builds pathos in the audience by usage of powerful words, while still maintining his somewhat reserved stature. By seeming both calm yet assurtive in his opinion through diction, Orwell is able to be extremely suggestive to the audience without being overbearing, creating a feeling of authority in himself. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:02:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289296</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>David and Anthony</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289535</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>He does not berate Gandhi for having another opinion, and does not necessarily say that his opinion is better, just him stating his own. Usually, when people want to be believed, they have to break down the other person's opinion and insult them, and Orwell does not do this. This allows the reader to believe that Orwell is not trying to prove anything, and he is just trying to state what he thinks, which builds up credit and makes him seem more honest and believable. This is extremely effective in painting Orwell as an honest man and someone who should be listened to.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:03:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289535</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kaitlyn and Nathan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289541</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The use of the word "inhuman by Orwell to describe Gandhi illustrates a negative viewpoint, which affects the audience's opinion. This initial rebuttal of sainthood by Orwell causes the audience to question the moral standards of sainthood, while also building his argument for human imperfection. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:03:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448289541</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ash</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448290621</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Orwell uses the word “inhumane” to describe sainthood, </div><div>he creates a negative tone within the readers based on his diction he chose to incorporate. When talking about sainthood in this way, Orwell affects the readers based on the non-positive thoughts by making the audience think twice about general knowledge within sainthood and human imperfection.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:04:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448290621</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Romeo and Morgaine</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448293503</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell builds his own credibility with ethos by agreeing and understanding Gandhi's beliefs while also respectfully having his own. The audience isn't persuaded by Orwell's beliefs but rather recieves a shine light from his point of view without tainting his credibility or Gandhi's.  Orwell establishing early on that he agrees with Gandhi represents both ideas effectively without putting either person in the wrong. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:09:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448293503</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kaitlyn and Nathan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448293928</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell established credibility through his willingness to portray both sides of the argument instead of making Gandhi's points illegitimate. The ability to respectfully disagree with a long held belief illustrates discipline and forethought within Orwell's writing. Therefore, the audience is more susceptible to contradictory ideas that are being presented. This adds to the overall argument by creating trust among the audience and legitimizing his claim.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:10:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448293928</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Taylor and Raelynn</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448294396</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By giving credit to some of Gandhi's beliefs, Orwell gains credibility for himself, because he is not destroying the well respected name of Gandhi. This makes the reader more open to considering Orwell's ideas, because they know he agrees with someone they respect and agree with.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:11:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448294396</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>David and Anthony</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448295620</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell made sure to carefully pick his details, to make the audience think of Orwell to be more convincing. He acknowledges that Gandhi and his family weren't going to die, but most readers resonate mainly with the fact that he was willing to let them die. The readers then see Gandhi in a more negative light, and Orwell in a positive light, whether they know it or not, that small detail affects what they think of Gandhi.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:13:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448295620</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Taylor and Raelynn</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448297617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This selection of detail grabs the reader's attention and appeals to their emotions, most likely making them feel angry or sad that orthodoxy to a belief was valued over the life of a child or wife. It also leads the reader to believe that Gandhi, one who is considered to be a hero, is imperfect himself.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:17:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448297617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Romeo and Morgaine</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299132</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The importance of Orwell quoting "Gandhi was willing to let his wife or child die" lays the line of the extremity of his morals. Using such an extreme example sets an inhuman tone to Gandhi's beliefs. This helps build Orwell's argument because it shows how seeking for perfection can cause damage to loved ones or people close to you. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:19:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299132</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gregory and Raymond</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299263</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By using the word "inhuman" to describe sainthood, Orwell creates a negative tone around sainthood by using its negative connotation. It helps to change the readers feeling into one of disgust, allowing Orwell's rebuttal to be more effective at changing the readers opinion. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:20:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299263</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kaitlyn and Nathan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell's use of the quote "Gandhi was willing to let his wife or child die" shows his use of selection of detail. This detail is important because it is being used to destroy the moral high ground that sainthood possesses over human imperfection. This detail then affects the audience by showing a different view on Gandhi's actions than is normally depicted. Overall, the selection of details goes towards discrediting the entire base values of sainthood and creates a favorable view towards imperfection.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:20:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448299668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Juan and Kennedy </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448300506</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The word "inhumane" puts people who are seeking sainthood at a more supreme level ,and makes it a position that is almost impossible to achieve. The audience's view of Gandhi is switched to see him as a impossible feat since Orwell conveys the thought that every human being has sinned, and therefore it is impossible to achieve Gandhi's level of sainthood. The impossibility of achieving sainthood rejects the idea that humans can go the path that Gandhi has.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/461906084/f4d39d7b731fc7700f5530b332571b42/These_are_the_people_who_wrote_this_analysis.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:22:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448300506</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cathryn, Victoria, Nisbet</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448300826</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Orwell uses powerful diction to characterize sainthood as "inhuman" it shows that it has a negative connotation. When Orwell says that sainthood is "inhuman" it characterizes that sainthood is impracticable allowing the audience to relate to those who don't follow sainthood.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:22:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448300826</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Elena and Maricruz</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448301671</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell using "inhuman" to describe sainthood brings a negative tone that may cause the readers to see the wrong in Gandhi's beliefs. The audience becomes skeptical of Gandhi's belief that sainthood is the only right way to live. This allows the readers to acknowledge and agree on Orwell's ideas of being human.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:24:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448301671</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gregory and Raymond</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448304462</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By building ethos, Orwell helps to validate his point and his reputation. Rather than simply slandering Gandhi, he brings validation to some of his points. The rebuttal shows to the reader that Orwell has a strong understanding of the topic, and knows what he is arguing about.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:28:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448304462</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gregory and Raymond</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448305863</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By including this important detail, Orwell creates a separation between Gandhi and the reader. The reader will feel surprise at this fact, and will not be able to relate to Gandhi, because they wouldn't do the same thing in the situation.This allows Orwell to manipulate the readers thoughts on Gandhi to better convince the reader that Gandhi's beliefs are excessive.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:31:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448305863</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Victoria and Nisbet</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448307258</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Orwell uses Gandhi's points he is respecting him by saying that they are "unquestionably true". Orwell builds ethos to further his point and acknowledge Gandhi's ideas, he also wants to connect to the audience in a respectful manner. This allows the audience to take in mind Orwell's idea towards sainthood.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:34:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448307258</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Juan and Kennedy</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448310233</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell's use of ethos when he says the points Gandhi makes are "unquestionably true" gives Orwell credibility by </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:39:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448310233</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Victoria and Nisbet</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448310461</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Orwell includes this quote it creates a negative image of Gandhi. It also allows the audience to see that sainthood has a negative side to it, as well as acknowledging that sainthood is inhuman. It opens up their mind to Orwell ideas.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:39:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448310461</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Maricruz &amp; Elena</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448312196</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By Orwell building ethos to validate some of Ghandis points and saying they are unquestionably true gives him credibility because he expresses that he respects Ghandis contrasting opinion.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:42:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448312196</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>alex &amp; adi</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448314393</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses words like "inhuman" to persuade the audience into thinking sainthood is immoral. The diction he uses has a negative connotation which reveals his true opinions on sainthood. Orwell use of diction pulls the readers attention and sets a disagreeing tone. The detail makes the audience think that sainthood is wrong and is immoral. This technique was effective because he is passively attacking sainthood.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:46:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448314393</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kathie and Sofia</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448316853</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell's powerful word choice leads the audience to viewing sainthood as something negative. Orwell's utilization of the word "inhuman" strengthens his argument against sainthood by suggesting that human perfection is unachievable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:51:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448316853</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ares and Chris</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317036</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell is showing that the opposing side is not incorrect in all aspects. He may be using this as an attempt to verify himself in a sense, for example building upon his own ethos by showing his respect for Ghandi, while stilling being capable of refuting. Doing so also shows just how much greater his faults are in contrast to the average human's opinion.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:51:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317036</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chris and Ares</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317260</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The word "inhumane" has and extremely negative connotation, as it strips a person of their value and compassion, and makes them almost worthless. Sainthood, on the other hand, has a very positive connotation, as it is used to describe someone of high respect and morality. To characterize such a words as "sainthood" as inhumane is a very powerful blow to the integrity and value placed in the position of sainthood. Orwell's word choice and diction of these specific terms creates a very vivid and moving demonstration on the reality that sainthood conveys, which is that you must be perfect in all aspects to be credible and respectable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:52:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317260</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Laura Searles</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317582</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses powerful diction that characterizes sainthood as inhuman as a way to make the audience have a negative opinion on Ghandis actions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:52:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317582</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Trey and Arianna</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317605</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell calls sainthood "inhuman" in order to convey that it goes against human nature and expectations.   This description would make the reader (being human) feel separated and off  put by sainthood.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:52:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448317605</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chris and Ares</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448319159</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell aims to include points that support his belief on sainthood: that sainthood is harmful. To say that Gandhi was willing to let his family die in order to validate his own faith turns Gandhi into the antagonist. It isn't fair to believe that any average person to go to the same lengths as Gandhi to validate their own faith, so it puts an unrealistic expectation as to what is acceptable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:56:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448319159</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Adi &amp; Alex</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448319983</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Orwell validates Gandhi's points, he shows the audience that he respects Gandhi. Orwell supports Gandhi to get more ethos. This tricks the audience into thinking that Orwell has no intent to attack Gandhi's statements. He adds credibility to Gandhi's statements which results in him gaining credibility from the readers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 20:58:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448319983</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sofia and Kathie</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321081</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By formally addressing Ghand's opposite viewpoint, Orwell gains some respect from the audience by showing respect and awareness to both sides of the argument. Awareness of both sides shows that Orwell is knowledgable as well as credible, which solidifies the validity of his argument.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:00:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321081</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Adi &amp; Alex</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321730</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The detail expands on the argument and proves how sainthood is immoral. For instance, humans wont let their wife or child die to uphold their religion. Orwell uses pathos to show the extremes saints go to in order to uphold their beliefs.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:02:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321730</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Trey and Arianna</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321746</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By respecting Gandhi's points, the audience is more likely to respect Orwell and his points. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:02:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448321746</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Laura Searles</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448322128</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell includes this detail because it shows the audience that Ghandi is willing to put the idea of sainthood over the people in his family such as his wife and children. it shows the audience the negative side of Sainthood.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:03:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448322128</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sofia and Kathie</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448322560</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>His usage of the important detail proves how inhumane and impossible sainthood is. In his effective selection of detail,  the audience is able to connect with Orwell's argument that sainthood is irrational as well as impossible. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:04:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448322560</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Trey and Arianna</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448324013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By including this generally off putting detail, Orwell is displaying how serious Gandhi is about his beliefs and the potential consequences of  them.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-20 21:08:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448324013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oceana Covington</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448443503</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The use of this detail in his essay is important for Orwell because it emphasizes his point that sainthood is unattainable and 'inhuman'. This solidifies in the mind of the audience that sainthood is something to be thoroughly avoided because it leads to extreme and inhumane behavior. This builds Orwell's argument by showing the audience that Gandhi's goal of sainthood is 'inhuman', as well as convincing the audience that being a human is the better option over sainthood. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 03:41:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448443503</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Serg</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448447296</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell’s use of “inhuman” towards sainthood represents his tone and mood towards sainthood and it   Also conveys the audience that sainthood should be avoided because it goes against human nature.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 03:54:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448447296</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Serg</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448448549</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By acknowledging Ghandi in Orwell’s essay about sainthood shows the audience that Orwell isn’t biased And will acknowledge the other side just to convey his argument in a more effective manner.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 03:59:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448448549</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Serg</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448450714</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell’s important detail on ghandi is very affective on convey his claim about sainthood and it also Provides the audience a bad taste in their mouth about ghandi because through the eyes of the audience they see ghandi as this peaceful person; however, Orwell uses that to his advantage by showing the other side of ghandi. This tactic is very affective when writing an essay.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 04:09:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448450714</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cathryn </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448467027</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Orwell uses the word "inhuman" to convey that sainthood opposes to the essence of human nature as the word displays a shameful tone to describe that sainthood is something human beings must avoid because it goes against the value of life as a human. In addition, Orwell is trying to state that sainthood is something unachievable and that imperfection is what human nature is all about.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 05:50:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448467027</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cathryn </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448468725</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By formally agreeing to some of Gandhi's points. Orwell builds his own credibility as he respectfully points out Gandhi's arguments and acknowledges his writing but at the same time opposes to the idea of Gandhi's sainthood which shows the audience that Orwell is trying to contrast to Gandhi's principle in which gives him credibility from the audience. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 06:03:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448468725</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cathryn </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448470249</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By including the detail that Gandhi was willing to let his wife and child die over sainthood shows that he values his believes in sainthood over his own family. It gives the audience a sense of self-doubt to Gandhi's principle of sainthood as it isn't perfect as people though it would be. That sainthood isn't always good and that nothing is always perfect as it presents that being a saint requires for you to commit a sin which what impacted the effect it had in the audience. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-21 06:13:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jenyoung/co1qzu30icw3/wish/448470249</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
