Our plan to gather material for our piece was to create a questionnaire of set questions and interview individuals. After we had the interviews we typed them up into a document and we picked and chose our favourites pieces and the pieces that had the best opportunity of creativity. Personally I felt our performance as a whole went very well. Our acting was very good and it showed that we spent a large amount of time preparing for the performance. We catered to our target audience of teenagers/ young adults as we managed to add enough humour into the performance to keep them engaged but enough drama to people to convey our message to raise awareness of mental health. The audiences response to the performance was positive as they seemed to have enjoyed the humour mixed with drama as when we wanted the audience to laugh they did , and when we wanted them to focus on key moments of drama, they were silent. We used a good range of storytelling techniques like physical theatre, verbatim. In our piece we didn’t tell a linier narrative but instead told a series of short stories using these different storytelling techniques. Our strongest aspects of our performance were our physical theatre scenes as we gave ourselves more time devising these scenes than dialog scenes to make sure our use of physical theatre was as good as it could be. Our greatest challenges were the watch scene as by the time we created in a way we were happy with it was the 3rd or 4th version of that scene. Another challenge unfortunately was attendance as towards the end of the rehearsal time members of our group became more frequently absent which consequently delayed our rehearsal process. I think to improve our piece it would have been better to have more of a narrative that is consistent throughout the performance as ours didn’t follow much of a main story so we could have intertwined the short stories with an over-all larger narrative. The use of physical theatre is a technique that I really think I’ll use again.