<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>EMW2021 Keynote 3: Dr Zachary Irving by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz</link>
      <description>Questions</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-06-14 19:45:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-08 07:57:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>non-relevant comment: I like how the paradigmatic case of mind wandering is the student mind wandering in class (true story)</title>
         <author>favolevf</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625481451</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 14:40:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625481451</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rumination question!</title>
         <author>jodierussell</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625483935</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does rumination count as 'goal-directed' if it's induced in the lab? For instance, experiments by Nolen-Hoeksema and colleagues ask participants to sort cards with emotion or self related terms in order to induce ruminative behaviour. Mulling over the terms, for instance, is relevant to completing the task set by the experimenter. Also, what if rumination is used as an emotion regulation strategy? Does that also make it goal-directed? A very pedantic question - sorry!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 14:41:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625483935</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Semantic and ontological cuestions:</title>
         <author>santiagoagudelo12</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625486143</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. What is the differences between "atenttion" and "thought"? Well it seems to me in various of your articles you use these concepts as they were equivalents. <br><br>2. As Seli and his collegues sustain (<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.007">10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.007</a>),&nbsp; If mind-wandering belong withing a family of spontaneous thought with relative constraint (less in contrast to creative thinking and more in contrast to nocturnal dream), how this claim overcome the vaguedness?&nbsp; Is to say, how the dinamyc view could overcome the problem of hetereogenity of mind-wandering if the brain dinamycs of control of thought are the criterion to distinguish mind-wandering of other kinds of mental states?&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>At the end, unguided atenttion or thought is, in turn, a very broad category (like task-unrelated thought). Indeed, I believe that this is a common issue in definitions of mind-wandering insofar as this definitions are negative definitions, like "Task un-related thought" (Standard definition)"lack of mental autonomy" (Metzinger),&nbsp; unguided atenttion or thought (Irving and his collegues) and so on. Your approach of mind-wandering, indeed, could be the best explanation of this subject. But, in my opinion, these two aspects could be the main difficulties.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>Thank you so much for your answers. I am a student very interested in this subject.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 14:43:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625486143</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Very dodgy self-promote!</title>
         <author>jodierussell</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625512974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I've been writing about rumination and affective processes myself! If anyone is interested in this topic and wants to chat, please let me know!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 15:00:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625512974</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>rumination and akrasia</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625516310</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I was wondering if on your definition, rumination turns out to be a case of akrasia. If there is a regulatory work of attention then it would be something like, say, smoking cigarettes: you know it's bad for you to ruminate on this thought, but you cannot help it, and this is because there is a strong affective component involved.&nbsp;<br>-Vale<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 15:02:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625516310</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Article in PNAS</title>
         <author>favolevf</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625524106</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Here's the link for the collaboration paper Zach mentioned on how to measure MW:<br>https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2011796118/tab-article-info&nbsp;<br><br>and the one on MW and folk psychology:<br>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cogs.12908<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 15:07:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625524106</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Glas and Anxiety</title>
         <author>jodierussell</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625554575</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If you were interested in writing more about rumination and the self-referential nature to ruminative thought, Gerrit Glas has an interesting paper on the topic drawing on enactivism<br><br>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/751752 (And Giovanna Colombetti has a good follow-up: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/751753)<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 15:29:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625554575</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>-PHIlOSOPHERS NOT MERELY AS CONSUMERS OF SCIENCE- tshirts and mugs coming soon!</title>
         <author>favolevf</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625567402</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-06-25 15:36:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jodierussell/cloosd6nai0q3zzz/wish/1625567402</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
