My terrific padlet by Sommers, Sydney R

NOMAD ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-10-22 20:21:23 UTC

SUMMARY: This article evaluates the effectiveness of hand-held X-ray units versus standard wall-mounted units in producing high-quality diagnostic images. Through a series of studies using many different statistical methods, it determined whether one type of X-ray unit offers advantages over the other. This article concludes that the hand-held unit is equally effective in generating quality diagnostic images compared to the wall-mounted unit, while also offering the added benefit of ease of use and ability to learning the techniques quickly.

DOES THE ARTICLE SUPPORT THE USE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY: Yes, this article supports the use of this technology and, the study proves that using the Hand-held has the same benefit when compared to WM x-ray. Additionally, incertain circumstances the operator may benefit from the portability of the hand-held.

3. DESCRIPTION AND INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNOLOGY: Handheld unit designed for dental intraoral radiography.

4. ADVANTAGES: Image quality (comparable to wall mount unit), portability, patient comfort (pt with mobility issues), reduced setup time, and operator convenience.

5. DISADVANTAGES: Some limitations would be operator error, battery limitations, radiation exposure, and cost.

6. COST: this article does not specify the exact cost of the device, just states it can be a higher initial investment when compared to the traditional wall-mounted devices.

Instructions in Detail:

ds1374mq — 2024-10-22 20:25:31 UTC

3 peer reviewed journal articles regarding the technology

a. Links to full-text articles (not abstracts) or in PDF form. Make sure links are in working order! If you find an article on the library database, please download the PDF from the library website and then upload to Padlet. This way you will have it for future reference. Links to the library databases are only

available while you are a student. PDF’s are ideal as websites and links can change.

2. Short summary of articles. Does the article support the use of this technology?

3. Description and information regarding technology

4. Advantages

5. Disadvantages

6. Cost

7. Optional info you may want to include: company sales rep contact information, your opinion, links to comparative products

NOMAD ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-10-22 20:36:19 UTC

SUMMARY: SUMMARY: This article explores the pros and cons of hand-held dental X-ray units. Among the advantages are their portability, the ability to remain with the patient during the procedure, a reduction in retakes, and ease of use for both children and geriatric patients. The disadvantages, include not adhering to the ALARA principle, the need for proper angling of the device—which can increase radiation risk—and the potential requirement for lead aprons for both patients and operators. In conclusion, the hand-held X-ray unit is user-friendly, follows safety standards, is time-efficient, and portable, making it suitable for nursing homes and use with children.

DOES THE ARTICLE SUPPORT THE USE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY: This article supports the use of handheld X-ray technology, highlighting its portability, which helps with nursing home visits, improves time efficiency, and helps facilitate x-rays on children who may have difficulty staying still.

3. DESCRIPTION AND INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNOLOGY: Handheld x-ray units are compact, portable devices designed for ease of use in dental radiography.

4. ADVANTAGES: lightweight, diagnostic image capability, battery-powered, user friendly, and portable.

5. DISADVANTAGES: operator dependency, radiation exposure, battery limitations, and cost.

6. COST: this article does not specify exact cost of the unit, just mentions that these can be a significant investment.

NOMAD ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-10-23 02:02:45 UTC

SUMMARY: This article outlines the techniques or guidelines for the handheld gadget. These include Uses, recommendations, radiation protection, training, and image quality. This article includes the importance of using this device in certain situations when the Wall mount X-ray may not be possible.

DOES THE ARTICLE SUPPORT THE USE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY: This article advocates for the use of handheld X-ray units, but emphasizes their application only in "justified situations," particularly when compared to the other two articles. Key considerations for their use include clinical justification, specific patient circumstances (such as emergencies or remote locations), operator training, radiation safety, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance. After evaluating these factors, dental professionals can make informed decisions regarding the appropriate use of handheld X-ray units.

3. DESCRIPTION AND INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNOLOGY: Hand Held X-ray equipment, which is battery-powered, portable and designed to be used when held in the hands of the operator during exposure.

4. ADVANTAGES: flexibility, portability, immediate imaging, reduced radiation exposure, patient comfort, and ease of operation.

5. DISADVANTAGES: increase chance of operator error, battery limitations, radiation exposure, limited field of view, and training requirements

6. COST: does not specify cost.

ADDITIONAL INFO

ds1374mq — 2024-10-23 02:38:11 UTC

COST: "Portable X-ray machines are more affordable, with prices ranging from $5,000-$60,000"

INTRAORAL SCANNERS ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-10-30 15:45:17 UTC

This article highlights how 3D intraoral scanners can capture digital impressions of patients' oral structures. These scanners help to improve the accuracy and efficiency of dental procedures. It lists the advantages, applications and future trends of using these scanners. Uses or applications of these scanners consist of restorative procedures, which include fabrication of crowns, bridges, and orthodontic liners like Invisalign. And lastly, it touches on the future trends of these scanners such as the potential use of this technology in every dental practice. Does this article support the use of the technology?:

This article believes it is up to the specific dentist to determine if it is more effective than other dental technology. It states that each technology has pros and cons.

I would describe these scanners as; using three-dimensional scanning of the mouth to create detailed 3D maps of the oral cavity for accurate digital impressions, crowns and bridges.

Some advantages of using these scanners within dentistry consists of; enhanced patient comfort, reduced chair time, and better communication between the patient and the dental professional.

Disadvantages include instability, transport/packaging, delamination, geometrical and dimensional inconsistencies between the plaster model and the real teeth.

Lastly cost, sadly this article does not state an actual cost but states: "main advantage is the low cost of these systems, make of few and cheap components" about the Triangulation techniques and devices.

ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: INVISALIGN ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-10-30 15:58:10 UTC

This article evaluates the efficacy of tooth movement using Invisalign, focusing on whether improvements have been made in the aligner's performance over time. It talks about patients using these liners with Invisalign, and measures the outcomes to assess the accuracy and efficiency of tooth movement. The findings suggest that advancements in the technology and design of Invisalign have positively impacted treatment results, indicating improved efficacy compared to earlier versions. This article also highlights the importance of continued assessment and study of orthodontic tools to ensure the best patient outcomes.

Does this article support the use of intraoral scanners?: yes, it talks about the advantages when compared to older developments of Invisalign liners.

This article descibes invisalign as an Individual fit retainer that is done through intraoral scanning systems. These liners help shift crowded teeth and develop a more straight smile.

Advantages of having invisalign done throught the process of scanners is that it they are clear compared to orthodontic brackets. Less need for frequent checkups to orthodontist, and more patient comfortability.

Disadvantages of clear aligners as stated in the article; "The overall mean accuracy of Invisalign was 50%." This is not the greatest percentage of change in the dentition given that they are supposed to be the alternative option of braces.

Price is not specified within the article. But according to the Itero reps that came in a talked during class, Invisalign aligners range from $5,000-6,000.

INTRAORAL SCANNERS ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-10-30 18:24:25 UTC

This article provides an overview of intraoral scanning technology in dentistry. It explaines the working mechanism of intraoral scanners, their role in capturing digital impressions of patients' oral cavities. Uses for these scanners consist of orthodontics, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry.

DOES THE ARTICLE SUPPORT THE USE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY: Yes, this article does support this technology by stating various advantages of using these scanners.

Intraoral scanners are advanced dental devices that are used to capture precise 3D images of the oral cavity.

Advantages of Intraoral cameras consists of :Accuracy in impression, efficiency in time, and comfortability with the dental professional and the patient.

Disadvantages of this technology is the initial cost is a disadvantage, and the need for moisture control

Initial investment in acquiring intraoral scanners and associated digital technologies can be substantial, exact cost of these products are not specified within this article

INTRAORAL SCANNERS ARTICLE #4: COST

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 15:34:43 UTC

COST:

Entry-Level Scanners: $15,000 to $25,000

Mid-Range Scanners: $25,000 to $35,000
High-End Scanners: $35,000 to $50,000+

ORAL MICROBIAL TESTING ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 16:17:34 UTC

This article talks about the use of oral microbial biofilm models in the testing of anti-cariogenic agents. Anticarcinogenic agents help prevent/treat dental caries. It talks about oral biofilms, and how it is built of complex communities of microorganisms that form on tooth surfaces and play a vital role in the development of caries. Additionally, it talks about the researchers that developed biofilm models replicating the oral environment's natural conditions, providing a valuable tool for studying the behavior of these microbial communities and evaluating potential anti-caries treatments.

This article supports the use of technology and says that these tactics have to take into account study objectives, pharmacokinetics, and growth agent, substrate selection, inoculum, and growth medium.

These vitro oral biofilm models help stimulate complex microbial communities on tooth-like surfaces. Which in addition, helps evaluate treatments that prevent tooth decay and disrupt biofilm

Advantages of the CDFF model is that large number of biofilms can be replicated and produced and the resultant environment is similar to that of the oral cavity as the medium flows over the substrata in thin films, mimicking saliva flow.

The disadvantages of using such inocula, however, are numerous. The site and subject specific diversity of the inocula make analysis and quantification of the composition of the resulting microbial communities extremely difficult.

Cost: does not specify cost.

ORAL MICROBIAL TESTING ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 16:17:41 UTC

2. Short summary of articles: This article talks about the use of microbiological testing and the association of this testing with the treatment of periodontal disease. It talks over the advantages and disadvantages of using this technology. Use of this technology is the most useful or has the greatest utility when used on a patient with chronic or aggressive periodontitis who does not respond to conventional therapy.

This article supports the use of this technology by backing up the technology with many advantages. Advantages including: help identify cariogenic bacteria, help dental professional treatment plan, help with monitoring biofilm levels and helps determine the future OHI for the patient.

Disadvantages of this technology are cost, time-consuming, false negatives/positives, interpretation challenges, difficult interpretation.

Cost: this article does not specify cost

ORAL MICROBIAL TESTING ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 16:17:46 UTC

This article talks about the effectiveness of plaque-disclosing agents (PDA) in aiding a dental professional in biofilm detection and removal. This article includes a randomized controlled trial to assess whether PDAs improved the removal of biofilm by professional compared to standard cleaning procedures.

This article supports the use of disclosing agents/microbial testing and this technology can be defined as colored dyes that are scientifically created to stick to oral biofilm. These dyes temporarily stain the dental biofilm purple making it more visible for dental professionals.

Advantages of this technology is that it helps aid in the education of the patient, helps reduce biofilm count in the mouth, and helps the dental professional in cleaning off the biofilm. Other advantages would be immediate feedback.

Disadvantages would be that it can be time consuming, given the limited time a dental hygienist has with the patient.

Cost: this article does not specify cost.

ORAL MICROBIAL TESTING ARTICLE #4: COST

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 17:04:55 UTC

COST (96 tests): $189

AI ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 17:05:53 UTC

The article explores the growing impact that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has in the field of dentistry. Its proven over time to help improve outcomes, and processes and enhance patient care. AI is being used and integrated into many different dental applications such as ranging from diagnostic purposes, treatment planning, and radiographic interpretation. It also talks about the various advantages and disadvantages of implementing this new technology.

AI or otherwise known as artificial intelligence is a computer science that aims to understand and build intelligent entities, often instantiated as software programs.

Advantages of the use of AI is to improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnoses, helps with personalized treatment plan for the patients, help with patient communication and patient care, and reduces the risk of missing diagnostic carious lesions.

Disadvantages consist of data privacy or security concerns with personalized patient data, and accountability; such as who will be held responsible for a patient who faces unintentional consequences resulting from error caused by AI technologies.

This article does not specify cost.

AI ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 17:06:05 UTC

This article examines the potential applications of artificial intelligence within the field of dentistry. This article talks about the opportunities that arise for the use of this technology such as assisting in identifying dental conditions such as carious, periodontitis, and malocclusions by analyzing radiographic images. It can also help with the dental professional develop personalized treatment plan for the patient. This article goes more into depth about describing what AI is, advantages of the use, disadvantages about this technology and cost.

Advantages highlighted within this article consists of improved diagnosis, treatment planning, increased efficiency, personalization of treatment and can help with remote monitoring/tele-dentistry.

AI is an "advanced computational system that leverages vast amounts of data and sophisticated algorithms, particularly machine learning and deep learning, to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and assist clinicians in decision-making processes". It is also described as a transformative and increasingly valuable tool that has the potential to revolutionize the practice of dentistry.

Disadvantages of the use of AI consists of data quality, ethical concerns, the integration process into clinical practice, reliability/transparency, legal liability, dependence on technology, and cost and accessibility.

The cost of introducing AI within the dental workforce is not specified as a dollar amount but it does mention that that cost would be a significant challenge in the adoption of AI technologies within the clinics.

AI ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-05 17:06:43 UTC

This article talks over how AI is revolutionzing the field of dentistry particularly through Machine learning and deep learning techniques. It highlights that advantages, disadvantages, applications and cost concerns. It describes AI (Artificial Intelligence) as a transformative technology that leverages computational systems to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. It allows systems to learn from data and improve their performance over time. The performance consists of pattern recognition, image analysis and predictive modeling.

Advantages of this technology listed within this article consist of improved diagnosis, early detection of carious lesions, increased efficiency and speed, enhanced precision/accuracy, treatment planning, and supports decision-making and accessibility.

Disadvantages of this technology consists of data privacy and security, legal issues, resistance from dental professionals, quality/quantity data, high initial cost and ethical concerns.

Cost is not specified by numbers but the article does have concerns about the high initial cost of the integration of this technology.

COST: AI Technology

ds1374mq — 2024-11-12 03:14:44 UTC

2D Practice: $137/month

3D Practice (Most Popular): $265/month

MYOFUNCTIONAL THERAPY ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-12 21:14:40 UTC

This article analyzes observational studies that examine the effectiveness of oro-facial myofunctional therapy (OMT) and how it can potentially treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The authors within this article support the use of this new and upcoming technology. This article shows data from various amounts of studies to assess whether OMT, can help reduce the severity of sleep apnea. This article would describe OMT or Myofunctional therapy to involve exercises to help improve muscle function in the face and mouth. The results from this article suggested that OMT may have a positive effect on improving sleep apnea symptoms. Advantages of using Myofuncational therapy include reducing the frequency of apneas and improving overall sleep quality, especially when combined with other treatments. One disadvantage is that the author noted that more studies are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the therapy’s role in sleep apnea management.

This article does not specify the cost of Myofunctional Therapy.

products

MYOFUNCTIONAL THERAPY ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-12 21:14:44 UTC

(This is the article that was provided from the guest speaker.)

This article discusses how orofacial myofunctional disorders which are problems with the muscles of the face and mouth, can increase the risk of dental malocclusion (misalignment of the teeth) and other craniofacial abnormalities. This author as well as the article supports the use of this technology. This author emphasizes that issues like improper tongue posture, mouth breathing, and poor swallowing patterns can contribute to malocclusion and affect facial development. They suggest in the best interest of the patients that addressing these disorders early through therapies like myofunctional therapy can help prevent or reduce the impact of these dental and craniofacial problems. Advantages of this therapy that are stated within this article consist of improvement of oral function, prevention of malocclusion, support for orthodontic treatment, facilitating craniofacial development, and reduction of symptoms. Disadvantages stated are the need for patient compliance, time-consuming, cost, varied effectiveness from patient to patient, and limited awareness and training.

This article does not specify a specific cost, however, it does state that this therapy can be costly and that this type of therapy is not covered by insurance.

MYOFUNCTIONAL THERAPY ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-12 21:14:49 UTC

This study evaluates the quality of life in children with skeletal malocclusion, which is the misalignment of the teeth and jaws after undergoing myofunctional therapy, a type of treatment that focuses on correcting improper muscle function around the mouth. This article supports this technology and provides a various amounts of advantages. The researchers in this article conducted a questionnaire-based study, gathering responses from parents and caregivers to assess various aspects of the children's physical and emotional well-being before and after therapy. The results and advantages of this therapy showed that myofunctional therapy improved not only the children’s dental alignment but also their overall quality of life, including their self-esteem, facial appearance, and ability to function in daily activities. The study suggests that myofunctional therapy can be a beneficial non-invasive approach for managing skeletal malocclusion in children. Disadvantages found within this article consist of limited efficacy for the severe cases, need for compliance and motivation of the patient, time-consuming, and lack of immediate results.

Does not specify the exact cost within this article. And it is best to consult directly with clinics that provide these services.

ORAL CANCER SCREENING DEVICES ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:02:28 UTC

This article talks about the use of OralID, a device that helps aid in the detection of oral cancer. The authors highlight its role in improving the accuracy of diagnosing precancerous or cancerous changes in the mouth. By the use of this technology, a healthcare provider can better identify abnormal tissues. The advantages of this technology is that it helps to lead to earlier detection of cancer, improved accuracy, cost-effective, non-invasive, and reduced procedure time. The disadvantages listed in this article include cost of equipment, training requirements, false positives/negatives, and technological limitations. This study overall emphasizes the importance of combining advanced technology with traditional biopsy methods to enhance diagnosis and patient outcomes.

Cost is not specified within this article.

ORAL CANCER SCREENING DEVICES ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:02:33 UTC

The article discusses the development of a low-cost, portable screening system designed for the early detection of oral cancer. This technology provides dental personnel and healthcare providers a different diagnostic methods to improve the accuracy of detecting oral cancer at an early stage. The advantage of this technology is to have the resources more accessible, especially in low-resource settings, helping to catch the disease earlier when treatment is more effective. Along with it being easy to use, cost-effective, and capable of reaching underserved populations, thereby improving oral cancer outcomes.

Disadvantages consist of limited scope of detection, training requirements, and limited sensitivity/specificity.

Cost is not specified within this article.

ORAL CANCER SCREENING DEVICES ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:02:37 UTC

The article explores the effectiveness of tissue autofluorescence imaging in detecting oral mucosal lesions. VELscope is a non-invasive tool that uses natural tissue fluorescence to highlight abnormal tissue, making it easier for clinicians to spot potentially cancerous or precancerous lesions in the mouth. The study found advantages of enhancing the ability to visualize these lesions, offering a valuable aid for early detection of oral cancer, ease of use, and its non-invasive nature. Disadvantages of this technology is the dependence on the operator's skill, false positives/negatives, and limited ability to identify all types of lesions. This overall article talks about the technology effectiveness in improving accurate diagnosis, allowing for earlier intervention and better patient outcomes.

ORAL IRRIGATION ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:03:32 UTC

Oral irrigation is a cleaning method that uses a stream of water or antimicrobial solution to remove plaque and food particles from between the teeth and along the gumline. This review found the advantages of adding oral irrigation to regular tooth brushing helps reduce plaque and improve gum health, reduce gum inflammation and improve clinical signs of periodontal disease more effectively than brushing alone. Disadvantages listed within this article consist of limited effectiveness in severe periodontal disease, technique-sensitivity and cost/accessibility.

Cost is not specified in this article.

ORAL IRRIGATION ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:03:41 UTC

This study tested the effect of adding oral irrigation to regular oral care for managing peri-implant mucositis, a condition where the gums around dental implants become inflamed. In a randomized controlled trial, they found that using oral irrigation in addition to self-care (like brushing) helped reduce gum inflammation and improved oral hygiene in patients with peri-implant mucositis. This suggests that oral irrigation can be a beneficial tool for managing this condition. Advantages consist of improved gum health, enhanced plaque removal, non-invasive and easy to use.

Disadvantages of technique sensitivity, requirement of consistency, and possible irritation.

cost is not specified within this article.

ORAL IRRIGATION ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:03:51 UTC

This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of combining tooth brushing with oral irrigation to maintain the hygiene of dental implants and overdentures. The study found advantages of using oral irrigation in addition to regular brushing. It was found to improve plaque control and gum health around both implants and overdentures. Participants who used both methods showed better oral hygiene outcomes, including reduced plaque and less gum inflammation, compared to those who only brushed. The study suggests that combining brushing with oral irrigation can be an effective strategy for maintaining oral health in patients with implants and overdentures. Disadvantages consisted of possible discomfort, technique sensitivity, and time and effort it takes.

Cost is not specified within this article.

TELEDENTISTRY ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:04:35 UTC

The article reviews how teledentistry and mobile health technologies can improve oral health promotion and prevention. Teledentistry is described in this article as using digital technologies to provide dental care and consultations remotely. This article supports the use of this technology. It finds that these tools have the advantages of enhancing access to dental care, educating patients, and supporting preventive measures, especially in remote areas. The study highlights the potential of teledentistry and mHealth to improve oral health outcomes in a cost-effective and accessible way. The disadvantages listed in this article consist of limited physical examination, technical barriers, privacy/security concerns, and limited scope of complex cases.

Cost is not specified within this article but is stated that it can be a cost-effective solution for promoting dental health.

TELEDENTISTRY ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:04:45 UTC

The article discusses a survey by the American Dental Association on teledentistry adoption. Teledentistry is described as the use of digital technology to provide remote dental consultations, education, and follow-up care. This article supports the use of teledentistry but provides both limitations and advantages of these uses. It finds that while teledentistry is growing, its use varies across practices. Dentists express benefits/advantages in consultations and patient education but face barriers or disadvantages of reimbursement concerns, technology costs, and legal issues. Despite these challenges, teledentistry holds promise for improving access to dental care, particularly in underserved areas.

Cost is not specified within this article.

TELEDENTISTRY ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:04:57 UTC

The article explains how teledentistry became crucial during the pandemic by allowing remote consultations and care while minimizing in-person visits. This article supports the use of this technology. Teledentistry is described as the use of digital technology to provide remote dental consultations, care, and advice. It highlights the advantages of the use of this technology like increased access to dental care and convenience but also mentions challenges or disadvantages such as limited patient familiarity with technology and regulatory issues.

Cost is not specified within this article.

PERIODONTAL ENDOSCOPE ARTICLE #1

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:05:51 UTC

The article explores a clinical trial comparing traditional periodontal therapy with treatment using a periodontal endoscope. It supports the use of this technology. In the article, the periodontal endoscope is described as a small, specialized tool that provides enhanced visualization of periodontal tissues during nonsurgical periodontal therapy. It allows dental professionals to more precisely examine and treat areas that are difficult to see with the naked eye, which helps to improve the effectiveness of the procedure and managing periodontal disease. Disadvantages consist of increased time consumption, cost, learning curve, and limited accessibility.

Cost is not specified within this article but mentions the potential for high initial investment and overall maintenance costs associated with this new technology.

PERIODONTAL ENDOSCOPE ARTICLE #2

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:06:04 UTC

The article evaluates the effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing with and without the use of a periodontal endoscope. This article supports this technology and describes it as a small, specialized instrument that provides enhanced visualization of subgingival tissues during periodontal procedures. It compares the outcomes of traditional SRP versus SRP enhanced by the endoscope, which offers better visualization of the periodontal tissues. The study finds that using the periodontal endoscope has advantages when compared to not using the tool, it helps with the precision of treatment and may lead to better clinical results in managing periodontal disease. Disadvantages of this technology consists of increased procedure time, cost, technological challenges and limited accessibility.

Cost is not specified within this article but talks about the initial investment may be on the spendy side.

PERIODONTAL ENDOSCOPE ARTICLE #3

ds1374mq — 2024-11-13 16:06:15 UTC

The article reviews clinical trials on the use of a periodontal endoscope during subgingival debridement for treating periodontitis. This article supports the use of this technology. It finds that the endoscope improves precision and has many advantages by allowing better visualization, potentially leading to more effective treatment. Advantages consist of improved visualization, increased precision, enhanced treatment outcomes, and minimized tissue damage. Disadvantages consist of increased procedure time, cost, technical issues, and limited accessibility.

Cost is not specified within this article.

COST ARTICLE

ds1374mq — 2024-11-19 17:23:35 UTC

COST: $1,695-$1,995

COST PER PATIENT: $1.96 per screening

COST ARTICLE

ds1374mq — 2024-11-19 17:26:02 UTC

COST: $50-130

Teledentistry Cost

ds1374mq — 2024-11-20 17:17:39 UTC

Cost: varies based on the website patients go through

Teledentistry (listed above): $50

Sesame: $75-80

DentalChat: $29-49

The TeleDentists: $59 (second appt/opinions: $199)

Periodontal Endoscope Cost

ds1374mq — 2024-11-20 17:39:55 UTC

Equipment cost: $2,500-3,000

Sheaths: $50 each (non-reusable)

Fibers: $1,400 (last 50-70 uses)

Explorers: $85 each