<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>O by K60 Nguyễn Văn Bá</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y</link>
      <description>Được tạo ra với sự tự tin</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:17:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-12-21 06:46:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>QUESTION 1</title>
         <author>lebichthuy</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958244739</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>SHOULD WE BE WARY ABOUT RIVAL CAUSES IF NO INDICATOR WORDS FOR CAUSAL CLAIMS ARE IDENTIFIED?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:20:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958244739</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>QUESTION 2</title>
         <author>lebichthuy</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958246528</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>WHICH PAGE IN YOUR TEXTBOOK SHOWS US WAYS TO DETECT RIVAL CAUSES? (PAGE 122 IS NOT THE CORRECT ANSWER :) )</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:22:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958246528</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Team Aplus</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958261883</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Q1:</strong> Yes, we should still be wary about rival causes in this case. Although a causal claim is not explicitly stated, it still implicitly contributes to the reason leading to the conclusion. In the example, the teacher claims that all the students are honest since they didn't cheat in 3 exams. But, there are many reasons why the students appeared not cheating:<br>a. All the students do the exams individually<br>b. The students already knew the questions in the exams beforehand<br>Only the first possibility support the conclusion that they are honest. Otherwise, the conclusion is not reliable. A: Cheating and B: Honesty. The relation between A and B is no cheating means honesty<br><br><strong>Q2: Page 128, Exploring Potential Causes</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:38:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958261883</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Newcomers</title>
         <author>k602111510018</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958262128</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>SHOULD WE BE WARY ABOUT RIVAL CAUSES IF NO INDICATOR WORDS FOR CAUSAL CLAIMS ARE IDENTIFIED?</strong></div><div>A causal claim is <strong>any assertion that invokes causal relationships between variables so even if there are no indicator word, if we detect causal relationships, we should examine rival cause</strong></div><div>Ex: All students in this class are really honest. I had watched them taking tests three times and they were very serious.</div><div><br></div><div>The first sentence is effect and the second is cause</div><div><br></div><div><strong>How to detect rival causes?</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Page 123, 124 different perspectives<br><br></div><div>&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:38:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958262128</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Potato Chips</title>
         <author>k602111110039</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958264606</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>SHOULD WE BE WARY ABOUT RIVAL CAUSES IF NO INDICATOR WORDS FOR CAUSAL CLAIMS ARE IDENTIFIED?</div><div><br>Yes, because there can be causal claims without indicator words. Although they are not explicitly shown, they make a large contribution to the reasoning and conclusion. Therefore, we need to look for rival causes. For example, there may be other causes why they did not cheat. They may know the answer of the test or they&nbsp;have accidentally done the test before</div><div><br></div><div>Which pages introduce how to find rival causes ?</div><div>P. 123,124</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-12-21 06:41:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/k602111510018/cj9x60nq4g1oe32y/wish/1958264606</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
