Do you think the jury trial is reliable by Emily Coates https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq An investigation into the 19th century jury system en-us 2017-09-21 09:42:43 UTC 2017-09-21 09:46:16 UTC hello@padlet.com Its much better than only having a judge. The public should be deciding if someone is guilty or not, not a judge whom is often very corrupt and may be very difficult to replace, replacements are often just as corrupt. coatese1 https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189663691 2017-09-21 09:44:31 UTC https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189663691 Elected judges are often very corrupt because the election system is corrupt. ALL CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CASES HAVE RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL. coatese1 https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189663886 2017-09-21 09:45:09 UTC https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189663886 People on juries are just average people, many of which have never studied law. The point of a trial is to prove whether or not something is legal. How can people who don't know what exactly is legal make these decisions? They often choose who they think is right or who they feel bad for, rather than doing the job a jury is supposed to do coatese1 https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189664061 2017-09-21 09:45:50 UTC https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189664061 It is good because it is people that come from different backgrounds and have different opinions. The reason why it is so much better than one judge or "professional" jurors is because that isn't fair to the person that is being charged for doing. coatese1 https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189664152 2017-09-21 09:46:13 UTC https://padlet.com/coatese1/ci2jnarmp7hq/wish/189664152