Does Aqib owe a duty of care? by Hashvini Pachappan https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5 Aqib is driving his car along the road. He is distracted by his mobile phone and swerves across the road, crashing into a bike ridden by Ben and then into a pedestrian Cara, both who suffer injuries. en-us 2021-10-25 08:52:44 UTC 2021-11-06 17:02:57 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f9d0.png aqib owes a duty of care rayhelmathews1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843399891 2021-10-26 01:01:41 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843399891 aqib does not owe a duty of care because there is no reasonable foreseability rayhelmathews1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843402543 2021-10-26 01:02:46 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843402543 aqib owes a duty of care rayhelmathews1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843403407 2021-10-26 01:03:07 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843403407 aqib does not owe a duty of care because of proximity rayhelmathews1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843404537 2021-10-26 01:03:36 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843404537 aqib does owe a duty of care to ben - natt https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843460580 2021-10-26 01:25:47 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843460580 aqib does owe a duty of care to cara - natt https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843462300 2021-10-26 01:26:29 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843462300 Aqib does not owe a duty of care to dev because dev injuring himself was not reasonably foreseeable - natt https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843465404 2021-10-26 01:27:41 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843465404 Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett because there was no proximity in the sense of having control over Emmet's situation - natt https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843471864 2021-10-26 01:30:07 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843471864 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843563339 Aqib(driver) owe a duty of care to Ben(road user). As Aqib was using his mobile phone while driving, his act will directly affect and cause injuries to Ben according to the neighbour principle that was stated under 'Donoughue v Stevenson (1932) case. (Kamala) ]]> 2021-10-26 02:04:47 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843563339 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843572191 Aqib(driver) owe a duty of care to Cara (road user). Aqib could foreseen the possibility of causing direct injuries to the road users like Cara as Aqib was being as an irresponsible road user by using the mobile phone while driving. It also can be seen that Cara is the closest person that will suffer injuries due to Aqib's act. (Kamala)]]> 2021-10-26 02:08:30 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843572191 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843578211 Aqib does not owe a duty of care because Dev is not a road user who was directly affected by Aqib's act. There is no possibilities that is foreseen as Dev tripped on the rake as he could have been shocked with the accident. (Kamala)]]> 2021-10-26 02:11:00 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843578211 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843584715 Aqib does not owe a duty of care although Emmett is one of the road users because Emmett is not directly involved in the accident. (Kamala) ]]> 2021-10-26 02:13:40 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1843584715 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844046297 Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, Aqib owes Ben a duty of care because it is reasonably foreseeable that an accident could happen as a result of his negligence (distracted while driving) and there is also proximity (one road user to another) -Batrisyia]]> 2021-10-26 06:02:27 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844046297 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844050057 Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, Aqib owes Cara a duty of care because it is reasonably foreseeable that an accident could happen as a result of his negligence (distracted while driving). Although Cara's injury was not a direct impact of Aqib's accident, a duty of care is still owed because there is still proximity (one road user to another, including pedestrians)]]> 2021-10-26 06:04:47 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844050057 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844067601 Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, it is not reasonably foreseeable that Aqib's accident on the road could cause an injury elsewhere. There is no also proximity as Dev was not a road user at the time. As per, Bourhill v Young, it was held that defendant did not owe a duty of care to the claimant as her miscarriage was not a foreseeable consequence of the death of her husband, there was also no proximity between defendant and claimant. It should be mentioned that duty of care is not owed to the world at large. Hence, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. -Batrisyia]]> 2021-10-26 06:14:31 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844067601 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844087897 Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, a duty of care is not owed to Emmett as the Neighbour principle could not be satisfied due to the lack of proximity between Emmett and Aqib, this could be geographical proximity (a mile away) or proximity in time (he was stuck in traffic long after the accident happened) -Batrisyia]]> 2021-10-26 06:25:11 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844087897 Yes hellocisaac https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844469371 He owes a duty of care.]]> 2021-10-26 09:47:50 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844469371 Yes hellocisaac https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844470356 He definitely owes a duty of care.]]> 2021-10-26 09:48:27 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844470356 No hellocisaac https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844471251 He doesn't owe a duty of care.]]> 2021-10-26 09:48:58 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844471251 No hellocisaac https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844471719 He definitely does not owe a duty of care.]]> 2021-10-26 09:49:16 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844471719 Mini https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844492827 Aqib does owe a duty of care toward ben

]]> 2021-10-26 10:01:32 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844492827 Mini https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844494329 Aqib does owe a duty of care toward cara]]> 2021-10-26 10:02:28 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844494329 Mini https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844497655 Aqib does not owe a duty of care toward dev ]]> 2021-10-26 10:04:21 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844497655 Mini https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844498744 Aqib does not owe a duty of care toward emmett]]> 2021-10-26 10:05:04 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844498744 Yes, Aqib owes Ben a duty of care. - Euodia https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844797502 2021-10-26 12:42:29 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844797502 Yes, Aqib owes Cara a duty of care. - Euodia https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844799647 2021-10-26 12:43:11 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844799647 No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. It was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would have caused harm to Dev. - Euodia https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844802129 2021-10-26 12:44:09 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844802129 No, Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care as it was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would cause Emmett to be stuck in a traffic jam. - Euodia https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844805220 2021-10-26 12:45:18 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1844805220 yes aaliafirst https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845508088 Aqib owes Ben a duty of care. 
it was reasonably foreseeable for the harm to have happened. there was also a relationship of proximity between Aaqib and ben.  ]]> 2021-10-26 15:58:22 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845508088 yes aaliafirst https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845509608 Aqib owes Cara a duty of care. ]]> 2021-10-26 15:58:52 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845509608 No aaliafirst https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845525126 Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. 
it was not reasonably foreseeable for aqib to predict the harm dev suffered. ]]> 2021-10-26 16:03:29 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845525126 No aaliafirst https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845543817 Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care.
Emmett was not in the location of the accident so, she is not proximate to aqib and he wouldn't in any way predict the harm she could suffer due to the accident. ]]> 2021-10-26 16:08:56 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1845543817 Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben as the proximity between them is close. - Umar https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848072657 2021-10-27 12:52:45 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848072657 Yes, as the proximity between them both is close as well. - Umar https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848077922 2021-10-27 12:54:34 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848077922 No, Aqib does not owe any duty of care towards Dev as the loss suffered by Dev was too remote, and it was unreasonably foreseen. - Umar https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848082283 2021-10-27 12:56:05 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848082283 No, Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett as the proximity (distance) between the both of them is too far. - Umar https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848087677 2021-10-27 12:57:51 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848087677 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848148627 Aqib definitely owes ben a duty of care - IMRAN]]> 2021-10-27 13:16:28 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848148627 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848157996 Like in a similar case as Ben,therefore Aqib also owes Cara a duty of care - IMRAN]]> 2021-10-27 13:18:55 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848157996 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848170881 As it was unreasonably foreseen as Dev suffered the injury,therefore Aqib does not owe any duty of care towards Dev. - IMRAN]]> 2021-10-27 13:22:39 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848170881 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848182343 The proximity between the two, Emmett and Ben was to far away to regard Aqib at fault so Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett- IMRAN]]> 2021-10-27 13:25:46 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848182343 Aqib owes duty of care to Ben because it was reasonably foreseeable that Aqib's negligent could cause harm to other road users. - Perevein https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848538172 2021-10-27 15:03:24 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848538172 Aqib owes duty of care to Cara because the the relationship of proximity between Aqib and Cara is close. - Perevein https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848546446 2021-10-27 15:05:45 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848546446 Aqib does not owes duty of care to Dev because Dev is not a primary or secondary victim of the accident caused by Aqib's negligent. Therefore, the injury caused to Dev was not reasonably foreseeable. - Perevein https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848554266 2021-10-27 15:08:03 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848554266 Aqib does not owes duty of care to Emmet, because according to the neighbour principle, there is lack of proximity (time, place) between both of them. - Perevein https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848565090 2021-10-27 15:11:13 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1848565090 Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben who is riding his bike on the other side of the road due to the relationship of geographical proximity between them - Syarmitra https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849748772 2021-10-28 00:30:37 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849748772 Aqib owes a duty of care towards Cara on the basis of reasonable foreseeability. Aqib's reckless actions poses an extremely high probability of inflicting injury towards a road user such as a pedestrian (Cara) in this context. - Syarmitra https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849765030 2021-10-28 00:37:38 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849765030 Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Dev. According to The Neighbour Principle, the foregrounds of reasonable foreseeability and proximity is not applicable to this situation. The consequences of Aqib's actions has not directly affected Dev, hence nullifying the fact that Aqib owes a duty of care towards Dev. - Syarmitra https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849782999 2021-10-28 00:45:03 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849782999 Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett. The elements of reasonable foreseeability and proximity do not run parallel in this circumstance. Aqib and Emmett's situations take on independent perspectives, thus reinforcing the fact that Aqib indeed does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett. - Syarmitra https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849805103 2021-10-28 00:54:13 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849805103 Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben - Aleeya https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849845645 2021-10-28 01:10:09 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849845645 Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara -Aleeya https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849847844 2021-10-28 01:11:04 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849847844 Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care as it was not reasonably forseeable nor was the gardening injury could be predicted by Aqib. -Aleeya https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849862209 2021-10-28 01:16:54 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849862209 Aqib does not owe Emmet any duty of care -Aleeya https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849863793 2021-10-28 01:17:33 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849863793 aqib owes a duty of care to ben. https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849870599 2021-10-28 01:20:12 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849870599 puteriroqiyah1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849948528 Yes Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben ]]> 2021-10-28 01:50:26 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849948528 puteriroqiyah1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849949874 No Dev is beyond the duty of care Aqib owes ]]> 2021-10-28 01:50:57 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849949874 puteriroqiyah1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849952791 Emmett too is beyond the duty of care owed by Aqib as a driver due to his distance/proximity]]> 2021-10-28 01:52:05 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849952791 puteriroqiyah1 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849954283 Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care to a pedestrian which is Cara in this situation]]> 2021-10-28 01:52:43 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849954283 Aqib owes a duty of care - Janice https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849985906 2021-10-28 02:02:24 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849985906 Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara - Janice https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849987795 2021-10-28 02:03:15 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849987795 No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care - Janice https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849988974 2021-10-28 02:03:47 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849988974 Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care because his actions did not directly affect Emmett - Janice https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849994235 2021-10-28 02:05:54 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1849994235 aqib own duty of care to ben https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850104971 2021-10-28 02:51:09 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850104971 aqib own duty of care to cara https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850105932 2021-10-28 02:51:32 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850105932 aqib did not own duty of care to dev https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850107443 2021-10-28 02:52:08 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850107443 Aqib doen not own duty of care to emmett https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850109391 2021-10-28 02:52:56 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850109391 Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care - Luna https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850122229 2021-10-28 02:58:11 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850122229 Yes, he owes a duty of care to Cara because of the neighbour principle, and the fact that all drivers do owe a duty to care to the road users around him or her. - luna https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850124904 2021-10-28 02:59:22 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850124904 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850130398 Aqib does not owe a duty to care to Emmett because there is no proximity between the claimant and the defendant. ]]> 2021-10-28 03:01:46 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1850130398 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852003379 Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben -El]]> 2021-10-28 17:18:40 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852003379 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852004406 Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara -El]]> 2021-10-28 17:19:07 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852004406 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852007124 Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Dev because it was not foreseeable that Aqib would have harmed Dev. -El]]> 2021-10-28 17:20:20 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852007124 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852008043 Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett -El]]> 2021-10-28 17:20:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1852008043 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856317668 Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben (britney)]]> 2021-10-31 07:51:28 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856317668 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856317998 Aqib also owes a duty of care to Cara (britney)]]> 2021-10-31 07:51:54 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856317998 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856318733 No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care (britney)]]> 2021-10-31 07:52:46 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856318733 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856319022 Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett (britney)]]> 2021-10-31 07:53:10 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1856319022 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871741400 Yes, Aqib does owe Ben a duty of care.
- Soniya]]> 2021-11-06 16:29:15 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871741400 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871751462 Yes, Aqib does owe Cara a duty of care.
- Soniya]]> 2021-11-06 16:38:23 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871751462 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871756805 No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. Dev's injury was not reasonably foreseeable as he was not directly involved in or affected by the accident.
- Soniya]]> 2021-11-06 16:43:20 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871756805 https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871776737 No, Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care. The proximity between the two is too large for Emmett's lateness and missing his interview to be reasonably foreseeable.
- Soniya]]> 2021-11-06 17:02:57 UTC https://padlet.com/hrpachappan/cgpn5yddviabqwy5/wish/1871776737