https://www.instagram.com/p/BgZAYQBl-cM/​

Instagram user has some relevant credentials as a doctor with certifications in nutrition which can be found on his website. This post however does push an agenda as they are highly against GMOs and are warning the public of ingesting these foods. Only has one source represented through a screenshot.

+We calculated this score for authority because she didn’t cite the sources in the video, and the account uploaded has no credibility at all. For motivation, it’s clear that she wants to push an agenda for her students. For reliability, she cited no sources, so we gave her a 0.

The motivs' of the tiktok is clear—creative a solid unified satement, issues, expiremtnes, and hypothesis. Due to this, this sector will receive a score of 2.

But because the writer of the film—source for the tiktok—is an award winning director whose not medically schooled, credentialed, nor trained, the reliablity is difficult to adheer to due to the fact this can be seem as a "baseless" claim" or personal and biased research—though its' built upon credible sources, journals, and experiments—thus, reciving a 1, for being secondaried sources.

For motivation, this page appears to be promoting an agenda of supposed "Health secrets" that, assuming from the page name, want to tell you secret methods to get healthier. The "doctor" in the video says GMOs are pesticides that are intended to kill animals, and Humans are inherently animals, so they must not be good for us either. This statement does not seem factual at all and would not make sense if it were true! This gives motivation a 0 too.

Finally for Reliability, there are ZERO sources shown, linked, or even mentioned during the short-span of this post. Without any sources to back these claims, they do not sound trustworthy at all. To make matters worse, the claims are not expanded on in depth either, so they really are just throwing things to the wall to see what sticks. Reliability is definitely a 0, giving a whopping 0 as the overall score.

Overall, we did not find this post trustworthy, and many of the bold claims would need to be looked into further through personal research.

The speaker is a non-expert who is restating information that he heard from a "homie" (whose credentials were not established).

Motivation: 1/3

While it doesn't seem like the speaker is trying to promote an agenda that would personally benefit him, it does seem like the creator has a strong personal bias against GM food, implying that it is unsafe to eat among other inflammatory claims

Reliability: 0/3

The only source mentioned in this claim is anecdotal information that came from a friend. The claims made in the video also contradict authoritative sources.

Overall score: 1/6

She is a Tik Tok influencer who has no relevance in the farming and chemical field. She states "if you ask someone from the 1970s" or "farmers would say" instead of siting real people or actual professionals.

Motivation: 0

She opens with "why do farmers grow GMOs" yet only states the benefits that GMOs gain from corn. She says that farmers use GMOs purely to reduce pesticide use yet do not show the reduction in pesticide use across all plants. She is using this bias to promote her TikTok account "thefarmbabe" and because she is located at an Iowa corn field (how convenient). Her claim appears very bias, and claims farmers do not use insecticides at all.

Reliability: 0

She shows a Chart of the BT trait in corn but provides no information backing the reduction of insecticide use. She is contradictory saying farmers no longer have to spray insecticides but, that they "were using a much stronger higher harsher dose", implying that they are still used. She does not site sources or have any professional speak. She has no links or relevant screenshots, only images and a video of her talking.