Supreme Court Cases Exit Ticket Period 4 Spring 2025 by Angela Simsuangco

angelasimsuangco3_3 — 2025-03-12 21:06:45 UTC

Example:

In my opinion I believe the the Supreme Court always/ does not always make the right decision.
An example of this is in the (Supreme Court Case Name).
At least two pieces of evidence from the case.

An explanation of _______ provides insight into____.

Miss S.

I believe the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. Based on our study, the Supreme Court interprets the law according to each case appropriately. An example of this is the Tinker v. Des Moines Case. When the Supreme Court agreed that the students 1st amendment right was violated.

Khalel Cardona

2025-03-21 19:42:35 UTC

I believe the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. The best example of this would be the Korematsu v. United States ruling. Despite the fact that Japanese-American lives were completely uprooted and ruined by the US government's order to put them in camps, and that there was no concrete evidence of Japanese spies in America, they still decided to defend the US actions. These people weren't even given due process of law to defend themselves from being sent to the internment camps. Even if it is during a time of war, discriminating against an entire ethnic group is wrong and goes against the 14th amendment.

Tyler L

2025-03-21 19:43:10 UTC

I think that the Supreme court does not always make the right decisions. Although they are experts in their field, everyone makes mistakes/errors. To support my claim, I will be taking a look at the Engel v. Vitale case. Essentially, a school was punished for holding an optional religious practice in the morning. I think this is an unfair ruling because of the fact that the prayer was optional and students were not forced to partake in it. It says that this religion was most likely Christianity, which is not any form of demonic or satanic practice, so I think since the prayer was optional, and it didn't attempt to practice any harm or wrongdoings then the Supreme Court was wrong to punish the school.

Jasmine Gutierrez

2025-03-21 19:43:26 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. An example of this is in the Tinker v. Moines case. The students wanted to have a peaceful protest by wearing black armbands. This action they took didn't harm anybody, and it didn't distract anybody from school from doing their work. It was simply a piece of clothing they wore to make a statement. The Supreme Court said that the students had freedom of speech and that they weren't doing anything wrong. I agree because the students were showing their opinion in a peaceful way. They didn’t interrupt class or cause any problems. The First Amendment says people have the right to free speech, even at school.

Jazlyn Wint

2025-03-21 19:43:48 UTC

In my opinion, I believe that the Supreme Court does always make the right decision. An example of this is in the Brown v Board of Education case. In this case, African American students were held separately from the white students. This causes hatred to form between the two. This also sense of inferiority to be established by the black students. The Supreme Court made the right decision in declaring this unconstitutional because it took away from the quality of education that black students were receiving. Allowing them to be treated just like their white peers established equality and an effective learning environment.

Oscar Hernandez

ohern25_1 — 2025-03-21 19:44:05 UTC

In my opinion I believe the Supreme Court does not always make the right decision. An example of this is in the Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States. The Supreme court disagreed that in a time of uncertainty, the military has the right to put groups of people in interment camps. But this displaced Japanese Americans away from their homes. They didn't have the chance to plead their cases.

Caylee Quon

2025-03-21 19:48:52 UTC

In my opinion, the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. An example of this is in the Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) case. In this case, the students were peacefully assembling and protesting for their beliefs. By punishing them for peacefully protesting without disrupting school, they are being unconstitutional. I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision because students should have the right to express their opinions as long as it does not disrupt school.

Keren Herrera

2025-03-21 20:23:21 UTC

In my opinion, I believe that the Supreme Court does not always make the right decision in every case. An example of this is in Korematsu v. United States. The Supreme Court ruled that it was okay to imprison Japanese Americans during time of war because of possible espionage. I think it is very wrong to imprison people just because they MIGHT be spies. They were imprisoned without having a chance to defend themselves.

Francisco Rodriguez

2025-03-21 20:29:10 UTC

I think that the supreme Court always makes the right decisions, An example of this was in the Gideon v. Wainwright court case. Gideon broke into a Florida Pool Hall and stealing up to $5, he was charged and was not provided a lawyer. The Supreme Court made the right decision and promised a fair and speedy trial. The Sixth Amendment gives people the right to a lawyer. The Supreme Court gave him the right to a lawyer and this helped him in his case

Jacob Critchfield

2025-03-21 20:46:35 UTC

In my opinion, I believe the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. An example of this was in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). In this case students were wearing armbands as a form of silent protest against the war in Vietnam. The school suspended the students for wearing the armbands, and as a result, the Tinker family sued the school for a violation of freedom of speech/expression. The court sided with the Tinker family saying that since this symbolic speech doesn't disrupt learning, it is constitutional. I agree with the Supreme Court because the student's weren't disrupting learning, so there is no reason for them to get suspended.

Paige Gutierrez

2025-03-21 21:32:40 UTC

in my opinion, I believe that the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. An example of this is in the case of New Jersey v. T.L.O. In this case, the main argument was that a student was searched by school officials to search a student. In this case, specifically, the supreme court could have seen it as the student's right to private property but they deemed the search to be rightful and ok because it was on a public campus. The court looked into the details and also noted that there was a rolling paper in the plains site that gave the officials reasonable cause to search. The judges look at all the facts and sides and makes sure there would be no loops in the rights.

Ella Hilliard

2025-03-22 01:04:37 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court does not always make the right decision. An example of this is the Korematsu v. United States. The Supreme Court sided with the U.S. that it was constitutional to isolate a whole group of Japanese Americans. though they ruled that since it was a time of war it was okay, it was not. There was no solid evidence that they were being disloyal to the American government. Due to this decision, their liberty was taken away.

Cyrus Devlin

2025-03-23 20:44:11 UTC

In my opinion, the Supreme Court does not always make the right decisions. An example of this occurring is in the case Korematsu v. United states. The Supreme Court ruled that it was constitutional to segregate Japanese Americans based on the fact that the United States was at war with the Japanese. However, there was no evidence that any of the segregated Japanese were spies or a danger to the country. They were imprisoned without being given a trial and were persecuted just because of their race. This defies the Constitution and proves that the Supreme Court does not always make the correct decision.

Noah Romo

nromo25_3 — 2025-03-24 06:23:17 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. An example of this is in the Schneck v. United States case. Schneck was only voicing his opinion and criticizing the government. He wasn't going out of his way to tell people to intentionally break the law but he was still found guilty. Schneck's First Amendment was violated in this case because everyone has a right to criticize the government, which he was doing without making any threats. This decision basically enables censorship and undermines democratic debate. Schneck voiced his opinion in a way that didn't create any clear and present danger, he just criticized the draft for the war. Ultimately, the Supreme Court's decision to punish Schneck for exercising his First Amendment right proves that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision.

Giselle Sloan

2025-03-24 15:33:43 UTC

In my opinion, I don't think that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. An example of this is in the Schneck v. United States case. One reason that I believe they didn't make the right choice in this case was that he wasn't directly harming anyone with his protesting. He had the right to voice his opinions on how he felt about people enlisting in the army and on top of that, he wasn't forcing anyone to side with him or calling them names for having a different opinion. I don't think they should've found him guilty.

Jacob Oliva

2025-03-24 15:42:54 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. An example of this includes Korematsu v. United States. The Supreme Court allowed Japanese Americans to be imprisoned during the war because of the potentiality of being spies. Eventually, the Supreme Court went back on its decision and compensated all who were victims or effected. Morally, I believe this was a wrong decision made by the court, and I think them going back on their word proves just that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision.

Josefina Rodriguez

2025-03-24 16:04:27 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the best decisions. An example of this is the case of New Jersey vs T.L.O. In this case, the Supreme Court decided that the search wasn't unreasonable. They stated that it was a public place on campus they had the right to search her bag. My opinion on this issue is I disagree because this is against the 4th amendment. The reason I don't support the Supreme Court's argument is nobody has the right to go their someone else belongings without their consent. Regardless if it is a public place or not.

Natalie Macias

2025-03-24 16:50:36 UTC

In my opinion I believe that the Supreme Court does not always make the right decision. In the Miranda vs. Arizona case, they ruled in favor of the defendant. While it states you cannot testify against yourself for violating the Fifth Amendment. I believe they made a bad decision, you also have to consider what the crime was. If someone admits to a crime that harmful. He admitted to the crime and the "intimidation" came from the environment that he wouldn't have been in if he never committed those crimes.

Gabe Burruel

2025-03-24 17:14:32 UTC

I believe the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. For example, in the Miranda v. Arizona case they sided with the defendant. The reason I don't agree with this is because he admitted to committing the crime but, because they didn't warn Miranda about his 5th Amendment before questioning him they couldn't do anything with that information. I disagree because he was getting questioned by the police and told them he committed the crime they didn't force him or anything. If he didn't want them to know why did he say anything or admit to it? This is why I believe they were wrong.

John Zablan

2025-03-24 18:12:45 UTC

As for myself, I think that the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision at least not in my opinion, as one of the controversial cases Korematsu v United States I feel like this puts into question what matters more about national security or civil liberties since in a different lens liberty of Japanse-Americans which was not given due process was detained unreasonably which goes against the sixth amendment but in a different lens sure it was for the sake of national security but at the same time it violates people's liberties which for me is more important since the constitution stands because of the people

2025-03-24 19:16:12 UTC

I dont think that the supreme court always make the right decision, its because of korematsu v united states, while i understand where they came from, it doesnt make sense to generalize a group of people just because of their race, instead of internment camps they should have figured out another way to protect national security rather than displacing hundreds of thousands.

Isaac Ortiz-Hernandez

2025-03-24 19:17:26 UTC

I believe the Supreme Court doesn't make the right decision. The reason I say this is to pick Kormastu v. United States ruling. I believe that the Japanese are being sent to camps due to the corruption of spies I believe that at a time of war, this is still wrong. I believe that it was morally wrong as there was no guarantee that there were Japanese spies in America. These people were not given the right to a fair trial and this goes against the 6th amendment.

Natali R

nrios25_5 — 2025-03-24 19:18:16 UTC

In my opinion I believe that the Supreme Court always makes the right decision. An example of this is in the "Gideon vs. Wainwright." They sided with Gideon because they believed it was right for him to get a lawyer especially since it was constitutional for him to get one. Another example would be the Brown vs. Board of Education. The supremecourt believed segregation was unconstitutional. Which it is, I believe it is the 14th amendment.

Dante Jacome

2025-03-24 21:12:02 UTC

I believe that the Supreme Court does not always make the right choice and an example of this is The Korematsu vs United states. The reason I think this proves this statement is because I don't they they had the right to put all Japanese Americans in incarteration camps. They was really no definitive proof that there were actually spies so they were going off speculation. Korematsu had the entire right to say no to this action since they had no actual proof he was a spy or harming anybody. I think they were wrong for siding with the U.S because action was not really nesassary.

Jacob Panduro

2025-03-25 03:25:24 UTC

In my opinion, the Supreme Court doesn't always make the right decision. An example of this would be the "Korematsu V. United States." The U.S. feared that Japanese Americans would betray them and become spies. The Supreme Court sided with the U.S. because it was during WW2. In my opinion, it's unfair to generalize a group of people based on their race and treat them unfairly.

Dominic Almero

dalme25_3 — 2025-03-26 04:10:00 UTC

I don't think the Supreme Court always makes the "right" decision, since their choices can be influenced by many factors, like personal opinions or how society changes over time. However, I agree with the decision in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). In this case, the Court ruled that students can express themselves through symbolic speech, like wearing armbands, as long as it doesn’t disrupt school activities. The school’s rule banning the armbands wasn’t justified because it wasn’t causing any problems in the classroom. Free speech is an important right, and in this case, the Court made the right call by protecting that right, even in schools.