<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My fierce padlet by Ernesto Vargas Gil</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:03:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-10-05 13:18:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Text 3 Re-write</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733900088</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Marketers are <mark>assumed to</mark> have a responsibility to society, and they often <mark>may find it difficult</mark> to balance that with <mark>customers’ needs</mark>. <mark>Some individuals may like the speed and power of a car</mark> <mark>and hence, would not be concerned</mark> about its safety features. <mark>Despite society or the government having safety measures in place,</mark> such as not allowing shops to sell chain saws without safety guards, <mark>some customers may find they only</mark> want a cheaper product that does not include the guards.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:09:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733900088</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Text 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733902013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>One of the most prominent debates in <strong><mark>Information Security Law</mark></strong><mark> </mark>over the last decade has been the legality of active defence measures, sometimes referred to as the right to “hack back”.&nbsp; Some commentators argue<mark> [</mark><strong><mark>ref.]</mark></strong> that active defence measures are a necessity in the modern information security environment, given the shortcomings of passive defence measures and the alleged failure of law enforcement to provide adequate protection. However, the legality of these measures is unclear <strong><mark>since another opinion is that…. [ref. 2]</mark></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:10:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733902013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Text 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733911198</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Marketers have a duty towards the society to promote <mark>right product with a precise information </mark>and provide details of the product to the highest degree. They should also look at the <mark>advantages and disadvantages</mark> of the product and inform the audience of the harm. They should also be <mark>mindful of their target audience </mark>and product that they are selling and avoid redirecting the item to the wrong genre of people.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:15:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733911198</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Text 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733913567</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Marketers have a responsibility towards <mark>the</mark> society and they are <mark>often unaware about customer needs.</mark> The safety features of car <mark>will not be of concern for customers interested in speed and power.</mark> And even though the society or the government should not allow shops to sell chain-saws without safety guards, <mark>the option to buy a cheaper product without guards should be made available.</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:16:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733913567</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Text - 2 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733914043</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><mark>Over the last decade, one of the most pertinent debates in</mark> information security law has been the legal status of active defence measures, <mark>which may also be referred to as the</mark> “right to hack back”. <mark>It is frequently argued that there is lack of</mark> adequate law enforcement to provide <mark>a holistic protection</mark> in the modern information security environment. <mark>There are existing measures, however, which can easily be challenged on legal grounds.</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:17:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733914043</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Text 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733916931</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>One of the most prominent debates in informational security over the last decade has been the legality of active defence measures, <mark>popularly referred to as</mark> “hack backs”. <mark>It is argued that such measures are becoming a necessity, due to</mark> the shortcomings of passive defence and alleged failure of law enforcement to provide adequate protection.<mark> [a data based example of such failures] </mark>The legality of such measures <mark>remains unclear and should be put to further investigation.</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-05 13:18:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mlx155_/cbe9xq0nekaf4g3q/wish/2733916931</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
