• paraphrasing

overview :

• teacher salaries accounts for the highest, while insurance was the lowest

• teacher salaries , furniture and equipment, resources -> witnessed a fluctuation

• insurance -> upward trajectory

• other workers salaries -> downward trend

Body 1: 1981 -> 1991

• Teachers salaries and resources rose from 40% and 15% to 50% and 20%, respectively.

• furniture and equipment and other workers salaries decreased ( 15%-> 5% ; 28 %-> 22%)

• insurance was nearly unchanged ( 2%->3%)

Body 2 : 1991 -> 2001

• insurance and furniture and equipment increased ( 3%-> 8% ; 5% -> 23%)

• while teacher salaries; resources and other workers salaries saw a decline ( 50%-> 45% ; 20->9% ; 22%-> 15 % )

• Teachers' salaries: allocated the most funding

• Increase: insurance, other workers'; whereas fluctuation: teach, furniture, resources

Body 1: Fluctuations (Resources, teach, furniture)

• 1981 - 1991:

  • Increase: Resources, teach

  • Decrease: furniture (dramatically)

• 1991 - 2001: opposite to the previous 10 years

  • Furniture: surged

  • Decrease:

    + Resources (plunged)

    + Teachers': (slightly)

Body 2: Insurance + other workers

• Downward spiral: Others': 28% --> 15% (nearly halved)

• Upward trend (gradually): Insurance (tripled)

Overall, teachers’ salaries consistently accounted for the largest proportion of spending whereas the opposite was true for insurance throughout the period. Spending on resources fluctuated, while expenditure on furniture and equipment changed considerably.

Body Paragraph 1 (1981 → 1991)

• Teachers’ salaries rose (40% → 50%).

• Furniture/equipment fell (15% → 5%).

• Resources increased (15% → 20%).

• Other workers’ salaries dropped slightly (28% → 22%).

• Insurance rose a little (2% → 3%).

Body Paragraph 2 (1991 → 2001)

• Teachers’ salaries declined slightly (50% → 45%).

• Furniture/equipment increased sharply again (5% → 23%).

• Resources decreased (20% → 9%).

• Other workers’ salaries fell (22% → 15%).

• Insurance grew noticeably (3% → 8%).