<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>12.1- Band 8 sample answers by LJ Moran</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh</link>
      <description>Made with the strength to succeed</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-25 06:56:40 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-11-26 03:46:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>group 4 (band 8)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912128532</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The figure demonstrates the UK labor force in five main economic sectors using percentage in 1841 and 2011. Overall, the service industry had the highest inclination of all, while manufacturing and agriculture suffered the most.</div><div><br></div><div>First of all, in 1841, manufacturing industry had the highest headcount, with 36% of the workforce, trailing behind is the service sector with 33%, and 22% of the workers belonged to agriculture and fishing, while construction and energy zones were unable to hire workers, with only 5% and 3% of the labor force, respectively.</div><div><br></div><div>Though the grounds had changed over the span of 170 years, with services soaring above anything else, from 33% to 81%. The construction branch had also experienced an increase but on a much smaller scale, as proven by a measly 3% incline. On the other hand, Agriculture and fishing had suffered a dramatic plummet of 21% of its workers. The significance of which can be seen in manufacturing as well, a&nbsp; decrease of 25% from 36% to a mere 9% of the UK laborers, a devastating blow. Energy and water industry had endured the same fate, but more moderate, with a mere 2% of a decline.</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-25 08:12:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912128532</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 5 ( Ngọc, Dung, King, Bang )</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912170687</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Glancing at the chart, this illustration depicts the proportion of the workers in the UK nation which is categorized in 5 main factors. Overall, the services field has outweighed other industrial factors in 2011, however, in the same year, the agriculture-fishing and power field have dropped down to the bottom of the chart.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In the years after 1841, a proportion of UK workforce had a great disproportion. A percentage in Manufacuring field reached the highest percentage with 36 percent of workforce, it showed that many people in this time tent to be a worker in manufacturing plants more than the other industries. At the second place is “Services” with 33 percent, it is nearly with the highest one. By constract, “Fishing/Agriculture” , “Construction” and “Energy/ water” were unpopular in 1841 because of the dramatically decline in the bar chart, the percentage of those turned in 22 percent, 5 percent and 3 percent for the lowest proportion in 5 main factors. A trend had an innovation when it turned to 2011.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Regarding to the fluctuations, the highest trend which was manufacturing had an downward trend after from 36% down to 9% between 1841 and 2011. The remaining services reached a peak at 81% in 2011. Furthermore, The agriculture sharply dropped to 1% percentage of workforce in UK. However, energy and water line still stayed at the lowest level which was 3% and a slight decrease by 1% in 2011.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-25 08:36:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912170687</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 2 (Riko, Leo, Han Le, Khang Hoang)</title>
         <author>phamcongduy2004</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912290715</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Bar graph indicates the proportions of UK workforce in different industries (Manufacturing; Services; Agriculture/Fishing; Construction; Energy/Water) over different time points is 1841 and 2011. Overall, The service industry has a miraculous growth rate faster than the rest.<br><br>In 1841, The number of employees working in the service field just accounted for a quarter, however, by 2011, the amount of total workforce has miraculously jumped to 81%. Compared with the two industrial fields, manufacturing and agriculture, both fields hit rock bottom during the period of time with a decline from 36% to 9% and 22% to only 1% respectively.<br><br>On the contrary, construction and energy/water didn’t draw any attention and were out of demand for both time points. Although the number of employees in the construction industry rose by 3% after nearly two centuries, it was still the second least common out of 5 major fields. Meanwhile, the energy/water workforce figures dropped down from 3% to a mere 1%.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-25 09:52:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1912290715</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1913524062</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The given bar chart depicts the distribution of the UK’s workforce categorized into five main fields in 1841 and 2011. Overall, the trend shows a sharp increase in the service sector, which dominates in the percentage of workers compared to the other industries.<br><br></div><div>Looking into detail, the most striking feature is that in 2011, the proportion of the employees involved in services took up to 81%, which displays a drastic change in the total workforce with a massive gap of 48% as opposed to the figure of 33% in 1841. On the other hand, there was a significant decline as observed in the manufacturing industry within the 170-year period, where it dropped from 36% to a mere 9% in 2011. Not to mention the agriculture and fishing field where the figures cut down to 1% from 22% of the UK's labor force.<br><br></div><div>Furthermore, the two remaining industrial lines remain just under 10% over a period of time, with a slight increase of 3% in the construction sector. In contrast, the water and energy industry stays bottom with a small reduction from 3% to 1% in 2011.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-26 02:21:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1913524062</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 4 (band 5)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1913635295</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The figure demonstrates the UK workforce in five main economies using percentage in 1841 and 2011. Overall, the service industry had the highest increase of all, while manufacturing and agriculture fell to the ground.</div><div><br></div><div>First of all, in 1841, manufacturing industry have the highest head, with 36% of the workforce, trailing behind is the service sector with 33%, and 22% of the workers belonged agriculture and fishing,as they tech back their are not advanced adequate for heavier industries, wheras construction and energy were unable to hire men, with only 5% and 3% of the labor force. As it was barely a trouble back theen. Or they just hate them, i don’t know.</div><div><br></div><div>Though the ground had changed over the span of 170 years, with services sprintig at break neck speed above anything else, from 33% to 81%. While,&nbsp; construction had also experienced an increase but on a smaller scale, as proven by a measly 3% of points . On another hand, Agriculture and fishing had decrease significant of 21% of scores. The significance which can be seen dramaticaly in manufacturing as well, a plum to 25% from 36% to&nbsp; 9% of UK ,. Energy and H2O work had the same fate, but moderate, with a mesly 2% per decline.<br><br></div><div><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-26 03:42:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ljmoran91/c7rx2kpiuytxb2vh/wish/1913635295</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
