https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7 RCSI module 3 en-us 2017-01-06 11:10:33 UTC 2025-05-07 06:01:52 UTC hello@padlet.com saadabualganam https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145654894 2017-01-06 11:11:20 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145654894 aisha_hamam_m https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145777662

]]> 2017-01-06 19:53:00 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145777662 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145795762 Strong points of the articles.
1. Clear justification for the study improvement plan By A. JCIA requirement(one of international safty goals)
B. Poor compliance 
2. Measurable objective. ( figure 2)
3. Testing the process in pediatric medical/ surgical unit before publication of the change.
4. Intervention #2 point 2 modifying the road map
5. Intervention #3 point 1 Saling the idea before start (pp presentation )]]> 2017-01-06 22:57:13 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145795762 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145796042 Weak points 
1. Unclear source of their baseline data.
2. Data discripancy (62%. 57%).
3. Late involvment of sheaf residents.
4. Technical weakness of allowing doctors to skip reconciliation

]]> 2017-01-06 23:06:14 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145796042 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810194 Critique: 
- What we did? 
- How did we answer in the Hempel criteria
- how good was the Hempel criteria, were there any weaknesses in this criteria
- in the disputed answers of Hempel criteria, why were there disagreements?]]> 2017-01-07 12:11:14 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810194 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810269 Key learning: what we learned from the article and the tool as a team]]> 2017-01-07 12:13:10 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810269 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810337 Process of working as a team, how our opinions changed, will we recommend the journal club at work]]> 2017-01-07 12:14:39 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145810337 hanan_806 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145815852 Good using hample:
Identfy the performance
Help 2evaluate the process and find out the strenghth and weekness
Help 2improve or further improvement on the process
Help 2reform the performance

]]> 2017-01-07 14:53:57 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145815852 hanan_806 https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145816060 1 encourege deep approch of learning
2 work to gather as team increase learning aspect and sharing ideas
3 develop better understanding of critical reading, process and valuation
4 involve the team in critical reflection ]]> 2017-01-07 14:57:31 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145816060 saadabualganam https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145826656 Reflection
the team experience in the evaluation assignment
1+1+1=6
Key Learning
1- The team get familiar to Hempel criteria as a useful tool of research evaluation
2- Developing reading critique skills is going to add in practice setting were the result does impact on work  done.
Page 1 Hempel

]]> 2017-01-07 19:13:35 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145826656 saadabualganam https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145827037 page 2 of Hempel]]> 2017-01-07 19:28:43 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145827037 saadabualganam https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145854357 2017-01-08 13:56:48 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145854357 saadabualganam https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145854382 2017-01-08 13:57:32 UTC https://padlet.com/saadabualganam/c7az30kyr2v7/wish/145854382