Whether for personal prosperity or societal progress the importance of food sufficiency is undisputed. Yet, the debate on the reasons and solutions for famine across the world remains intense. While some argue that natural disasters are the main cause, others point to human’s conflicts as components. If left unsolved, staving can lead to tragic consequences, so practical actions are necessary. This essay will analyze the hurdles before proposing effective measures. 

The failure to tackle this issue can be attributed mainly to inadequate weather conditions, not to mention the detrimental impact of civil war on agriculture outputs. It is the global climate change that causes the notable blight in the yields of produce. Crops have their own kind of weather which is suitable for them to grow healthily, thus, without these conditions, plants can be restrained from their most productive output. Moreover, almost all kinds of crops are unable to survive in natural catastrophes. Severe phenomena, such as storms, tornados can devastate everything, let alone the vulnerable things like plants. It is also the destruction of human conflict over the years that has negative effects on agricultural production field. During the war, the farmers could not focus on producing food, they might have to leave their hometown to find refuge. The majority of food left must be submitted to serve for the military force during the war. 

To address this pressing obstacle, immediate measures need to be taken. The first compelling step towards mitigating the problems is promoting government support and subsidies. To achieve this end, the government should give the affected areas disaster patronages to fix the extreme consequences and send experts to these places to help farmers mitigate the impact of climate change. Equally crucial is that international institutions and well-developed countries should join hands in stopping the war and keep the world in peace. Achieving this is by no means an effortless task, but it is attainable with the appropriate effort. 

In conclusion, climate change and civil war is undeniably the root of the issue, which contributes to famine across the world. Solving this hurdle depends on how sufficient solutions are applied on the global scale.

Whether for personal progress or societal development, the essence of taking risks wisely is undeniable. Yet, in light of the concerns surrounding whether taking risks brings more benefits than drawbacks to people, the debate has become intense. Although I see facing challenges brings about lots of painful failure, I believe that risks are useful opportunities to improve.

One justification for taking risks is that it develops people’s problem-solving skills in both private life and career. The more failures we have, the more decisive we become. People have the ability to judge future risks to know whether it is worth trying or not. Risks can also stimulate risk-takers to push their limit. Humans are innately afraid of losing, so risk-takers would do their best to overcome the risky challenges. Another surprising advantages of facing obstacles is that every risky challenge is coupled with an outstanding reward. If people just stay in their safety zones, they can’t gain eye-opening knowledge and experiences. We don’t try, so we can’t win. Many billionaires in the world, such as Mark Zukerberg, Elon Musk, and admirable scientist Thomas Edison, failed many times to reach their success. Failure gives us experiences, which help us seek out the mistake in the process. The biggest risk is not to take any risks.

However, taking risks always comes with its potential problems. Taking unworthy risks can bring devastating consequences. Choosing challenges naïvely without considering self-ability leads to an endless series of defeats, making people feel insecure about their talent and scared of trying anything new. Moreover, not every failure is overcome easily. In business field, a mistaken decision can cause irreparable results, or even bankruptcy.

In summary, taking risks in both personal and professional lives brings profound advantages to people, which outweigh the unwanted disadvantages.

The most obvious enhancements are

housing infrastructure. Many houses will be constructed to replace factories, the space of farmland is also narrowed to make room for new accommodations. Another notable transformation is that more routes in the Norbiton town is prolonged, one is built across the river connecting its two banks, and a small roundabout will also be erected in the town’s traffic system.

In the future development, Norbiton town’s infrastructure will be upgraded to serve its citizens. In the eastern part of the town which used to be a factory, people will construct a new school for students, and a playground will be set up adjacent to the river’s bank. The space around the new roundabout is used to place a shops and a medical centre-serving people’s everyday needs.

Overall, it is obvious that all funding stream mentioned considerably increased during the two-year period. Thus, there was some alteration in the distribution of the financial income, especially in salaries and technology.

The total expenditure of the police witnessed a growth of about 14m. The nation government police subsidy was the primary contributor with 175.5m in 2017 and went up to 177.8m in 2018. This was followed by Local Taxes with 91.2m and 102.3m in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Other sources, such as grants, was the smallest source of the table at 38m, rose slightly to 38.5 in 2018. 

The salaries paid to officers and staffs dropped from 75% to 69% of the spending but still accounted for the highest portion. Meanwhile, Technology experienced a contrasting trend compared to the salaries. From 2017 to 2018, the spending on technology doubled from 8% to 17%. Expense on infrastructure, including buildings and transport remained steady at 17% throughout the two years.

In summary, the enhancement of police budget reflected the growing importance of policing work and the shift in money distribution indicating the concentration on improving infrastructure.

Proponents of working in a compulsory country claim that it prevents brain drain, a pressing issue in many nations. In some countries, especially developing countries, a large number of workers move to other countries to start their career due to higher salaries and better infrastructure they can receive. Telling example is that in Vietnam, a large number of skilled doctors are working in developed countries’ hospital because their home country has yet adapted their technical and monetary desire. This result in a lack of workforce in their home countries. Additionally, the educational activities and infrastructure are subsidized by the national government, so people should stay and work for the country where they did their training.

However, choosing the workplace is a reasonable right of employees. Forcing people to work in a place they do not prefer might make them feel resentment because it takes away their freedom to work. Dissatisfied employees can’t be productive, thus, lowering overall productivity. Moreover, requiring professionals to work in fixed countries could limited technology and knowledge exchange between countries. If professionals are restricted to a place, they can’t spread their expertise to others.

In support of freely choosing countries to

work in, I firmly believe that it fosters the even growth of countries all over the world. Developing countries can send and subsidize their prominent students to some rich countries to learn technical and academic knowledge and these students, after graduation, will come to help develop their countries. In the relentlessly growing population scenario, job opportunities have become rarer, let alone working in just one required country. Thus, working abroad can somehow enhance the employment ratio.

In conclusion, while working in required country can bring some advantages, but in terms of a long-term sustainability it can cause potential issues. Governments in every country should ensure the human freedom to choose where people desire to work to move toward a more stable development.