https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe In 1926, there were no longer wolves in Yellowstone, once the natural habitat of this species. Between 1977 and the re-introduction in 1995, we have reliable reports of wolves being seen throughout the park. Most of them were either lone wolves or pairs, probably only transiting. Finally, in 1995, grey wolfpacks were reintroduced in the Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park and Idaho. When whales were at their historic populations, before their numbers were reduced, it seems that whales might have been responsible for removing tens of millions of tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere every year. Whales change the climate. The return of the great whales, if they are allowed to recover, could be seen as a benign form of geo-engineering. It could undo some of the damage we have done, both to the living systems of the sea, and to the atmosphere. en-us 2017-12-14 01:26:39 UTC 2020-10-13 01:23:27 UTC hello@padlet.com p_white https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216023169 How do the Wolves change the Rivers?
What if the Wolves were never introduced to Yellowstone National Park? What would be the environmental status of this National Park land? ]]> 2017-12-14 01:30:11 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216023169 p_white https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216023914 How do Whales change climate conditions on Earth?
What would be the state of the Earth without Whales according to scientific evidence of their habitat?]]> 2017-12-14 01:36:46 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216023914 https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027208 Whales increase the amount of plankton in the ocean. These plankton take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and eventually this carbon is stored at the bottom of the ocean for many years. 
According to scientific evidence, if there were no whales on earth there would be much less of other sea life. Also, due to less plankton, there would be more carbon in the atmosphere.]]> 2017-12-14 02:08:38 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027208 https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027243 There would be more greenhouse gases in da wolrd]]> 2017-12-14 02:09:03 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027243 https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027328 More whales produces more plankton. Plankton absorbs carbon dioxide from the air. If there were no whales there would be a limited amount of fish, krill and plankton. This means that there would be limited food for the ocean life and nothing to absorb carbon from the air.


]]> 2017-12-14 02:09:51 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027328 https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027370 Whales increase the number of fish, plankton and krill in the ocean. Plankton takes carbon from the atmosphere and stores it at the bottom of the oceans. Without whales there would be less food for ocean life and humans.]]> 2017-12-14 02:10:26 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027370 https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027381 The rivers would be a mess because the tree roots hold the dirt together and without the roots, the dirt would erode away. Yay, gtyugi


]]> 2017-12-14 02:10:30 UTC https://padlet.com/p_white/c3k3urwenmwe/wish/216027381