<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Performance Review Process by Marilyn Tom</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks</link>
      <description>reflections and feedback</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-05-27 18:55:53 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-03-13 15:31:25 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1a. What worked well in the approach for DELIVERING the 2022 performance reviews to your staff?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495929430</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-27 07:17:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495929430</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4. What would you propose that we DO DIFFERENTLY for our process in 2023?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495930337</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-27 07:18:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495930337</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3b. For 2023, we&#39;re considering doing both a MID-YEAR and end-of-year review, plus an extra step for SELF-RATING. What do you think of this?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495931934</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-27 07:19:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495931934</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1b. What worked well in the approach for RECEIVING your 2022 performance review from your supervisor?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495938537</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-27 07:27:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2495938537</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2. What did NOT work well in the 2022 performance review process, either as a giver or a receiver?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2501749799</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-02 21:33:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2501749799</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3a. For 2023, we&#39;re considering adding a step to request PEER FEEDBACK (also known as &quot;360 feedback&quot;). What do you think of this?</title>
         <author>mtom7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2501750271</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-02 21:34:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mtom7/Bookmarks/wish/2501750271</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
