<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Cortavious McNeal by Cortavious</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4</link>
      <description>Recreational Marijuana and Federalism</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-05 14:55:39 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-02-07 13:08:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>What is the definition Federalism?</title>
         <author>taytaymcneal1212</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229066474</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Federalism is a system of government in which entitles such as states or provinces share power with a national government. The United States government functions according to the principles of federalism. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-07 12:55:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229066474</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the use of Recreational Marijuana become an issue of federalism?</title>
         <author>taytaymcneal1212</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229066724</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Even if the federal government honors its commitment to not enforce federal drug laws against those complying with robust states regulatory regimes. The ancillary consequence flowing from the continuing federal prohibition remain profound. Banks, attorneys, insurance companies, potential investors, and others justifiably concerned about violating federal laws are reluctant to provide investment capital, legal advice, or other basic professional services necessary for marijuana businesses to function. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-07 12:56:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229066724</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What are the main points for this to remain a state issue? a federal issue?</title>
         <author>taytaymcneal1212</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229067235</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Twenty-six states have passed statutes that legalize marijuana to some extent.  Some have legalized it for recreational use. Others have only legalized it for medical purposes. But, marijuana possession remains a crime on the federal books. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-07 12:58:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229067235</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Analysis- What said of the argument do you most agree with?</title>
         <author>taytaymcneal1212</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229067671</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I agree with the side that the states should be the ones to deal with the recreational not the federal government they got so much to deal with why should they need to address a state matter.People are going to continue to use it whether its illegal or legal.Even though recreational marijuana is both a federal and state issue I think that the states should have their own say when it comes to their state. New York times agrees too.They state that "states are starting to defy the federal marijuana ban".&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-07 12:59:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229067671</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SORUCES</title>
         <author>taytaymcneal1212</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229070074</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/07/16/state-politics-vs-the-federal-government/states-need-more-control-over-the-federal-government?mcubz=0">https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/07/16/state-politics-vs-the-federal-government/states-need-more-control-over-the-federal-government?mcubz=0</a><br><br><a href="http://reason.com/archives/2017/03/01/the-marijuana-exception-to-federalism">http://reason.com/archives/2017/03/01/the-marijuana-exception-to-federalism</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-07 13:07:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/taytaymcneal1212/Federalism4/wish/229070074</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
