Strategic Priorities of programmes do reflect the promotion of European Values

Some of the most endangered youth however are still not reached so we need to continue working on inclusion of those not being very involved in the democratic process yet.

European values should be more concrete an reachable, in order to be reaching marginalized youth, for example the solidarity corps could be a way to get there. It is necessary to use understandable words.

New developments to take into consideration: e.g. critical processing of information

Programmes are tackling European values "fluffy": Could there be some specific quastion in the application form? A further explanation what is meant? However, this should not be too much of a restrictive definition. Maybe examples as an inspiration?

Take into consideration democratic involvement in non-classical forms. Have a broad outlook on participation - not only mock parliaments but also for ex. activism or solidarity projects.

E+ and ESC programmes have a magnificent role in enhancing competencies of young people, empower young people already from the age of 13 and allow them to be responsible and conscious citizens - to go over the daily struggle and think more strategically: whom to vote for, what can I do regarding new laws for young people

for majority of young people the programmes are the first opportunity for mind-opening the world outside their bubble - in a family, at school etc. they travel and discover the world. Programmes help them to build their future network, discover Europe in practice

participation in projects boosts confidence, opens mind, but also gives a good work ethic that you dig into once you are employed

the values of both programmes (escpecially Erasmus+, YiA) help to build national laws (eg. "Law on youth" in North Macedonia) and to break down the stereotypes (BE-FR - overcoming racism)

programmes help to build up the gap where values at the national level are missing (eg. perception of/respect towards LGBTQ+ people in countries where right-wing parties are getting more attention)

programmes are mind-opener for the issues which should be addressed at the national level and are already well-defined at the European level (eg. mental health, bullying in schools)

programmes also help to build preventive measures - like resilience and personal strength of young people, they become more confident with themselves, their skills and competences and this should be definitely upheld; indivudual resilience is compulsory for good well-being and good mental health

programmes help to de-stigmatize issues which are important to young people - eg. depression, need for individual well-being, special needs

more focus on resilience of young people as a counterfeit to current daily uncertainities and help young people to overcome change

young people with fewer opportunities and special needs should participate in both programmes at a larger % - national projects (Solidarity projects, Youth participation projects) help such young people to participate in both programmes even without travellling, as some young people with fewer opportunities are reluctant to travel

more youth work on how not to stigmatize young people with fewer opportunities and, if such things happen in projects, how to teach young people good ethic conduct towards young people with fewer opportunities, teach inclusive language etc. - the work is still in progress in many countries

keep "Democracy and values" as a horizontal priority in both programmes; counterfighting stereotypes, promoting tolerance towards diversity should be more underlined - especially in the current situation in Europe. Common values should help us to build to the image of Europe as a common construct

This is happening already by definition as European programs

Research and participants' surveys show that they contribute

There are also other ways to reach these goals, everyone is not interested in the mobility programs

The programs are quite stiff (specifically on the funds allocation)

National contributions also to the programs (possible expansion and enlargement of the programs in neighborhood countries)

Expansion of target group and outreach

Erasmus+ and ESC projects are based on participation of participants. If the project is properly done, we have co-decision of the process. Young people learn on how to act in democratic society

Programmes unconsciously contribute to values. It is happening anyway

Group activities contribute to pluralism in society

Solidarity is an EU value. ESC strongly contributes to this topic

Erasmus+ youth exchanges are also long term projects (not only short activity)

Opportunities are not available to all young people. Values could be better distributed.

Making things easier, with less rules, less bureaucracy, thus increasing accessability.

Make the governments feel the responsibility of supporting the programmes.

Financial literacy should be promoted.

Young people who have already participated in the programmes should be used as multipliers ("ambassadors").

More young people show interest and willingness to contribute. That's a sign that the programmes do contribute to European values.

Travelling, going to other places gives young people the feeling of being involved, of being European. That attitude is important.

It is inherent to the programs. The whole idea of solidarity is already an EU value. Therefore European Solidarity Corps is a strong contribution for this topic. That is why it should be reinforced. Also mobility is closely linked with diversity: the interest of meeting people with different backgrounds.

Elections. Curious about how participation will be in the elections in particular in countries as Hungary, and specifically in disadvantage areas or rural areas or roma population: Both programs have a huge potential and tools to encourage participation in elections.

its the founding idea of the programmes

RAY results prove, that the projects bring people closer to the EU and feeling of european citizenship

Opportunities to experience first-hand the values

If you want to understand something, you have to experience it - and the programmes are unique in providing the opportunity to experience the EU and its values

Maybe we need more dedicated actions to inclusive and cohesive projects; inspiration in E&T sector - Policy Experimentation

Sometimes unclear if some of the values are really truly shared among countries

Participation is still a bit hidden in the programs it should be stressed more.

We reach the people that we have already reached the goal should be to attract new people.

Peer to peer influence should be used because sometimes it is more effective than campaigns. Programmes create a lot of opportunities for this.

Discover EU has a great potential to reach new participants that have never been in the programmes and are not so aware of EU Values. They could be put in touch with former volunteers of European Solidarity Corps.

Transnational activities are also good to find potential partners.

Put young people in the center, as protagonists. That is the way to increase involvement. Let them talk about the things they want to talk about. If you give them space rather than "preaching"

Need to clearly know what are EU values and what values we need to focus on

A better use of the programmes could contribute to slow democratic backsliding

Budget of the programmes should be increased

EU programmes contribute greatly. The added value in understanding EU and contributing to peace cannot be underestimated.

Mobility gives an important input to the European identity, they help to get to know eachother, gain value, gain skills.

Both programmes are learning programmes, they give chances to yp to experiment/experience european values and in particular and to get in touch with these values in a non-formal way,this is not always a garentue in the formal education sector. Youth participation activities are unique space to learn, experiment with democracy participation.

The fact that funding on the European level specifically for young people and for youth organisation is there, is already an important signal that Europe values them. This is an important message that the EU send to young people and valorises them.

the different Priorities gives input to the European values and what Europe stands for.

Values are in the core of the programmes and this should remain.

The EU programmes give opportunity to yp that are not going on a transnational education experience esp. the ESC plays an important role . Bringing yp together makes people better realise what are the common values

Active citizenship and democracy, solidarity are values that should remain in the centre of the programmes.

Strengthen outreach to youth organizations.

Strengthen the connections with the neighbouring partner countries.

Streamlining the horizontale priorities.

Youth programmes do respect and safeguard European values.

European youth programmes should not be considered as a luxury, but a standard. They should be available for all young people regardless of their background.

Personal experience and participation on the programmes create belonging to a larger European community.

Projects need follow-up - impact on the attitudes need a longer process; maybe new projects and also national activities.

How to foster these values in the current political atmosphere. How to co-operete and who with? How to support civil society and civic activities time? Youth programmes create possibilities to co-operate with the countries and societies which are not part of the EU and its core values at the moment.

The rising far-right movement is threatening democracy throughout Europe. How could youth programmes be used as a counteract for the threat.

More funding, more projects, more people positively impacted

Systemic impact of projects should be more supported - possibly work with mulipliers, think of sustainability of the results...

DiscoverEU proved to be a valuable program despite original concerns.. do not be afraid to think outside of the box

Possibly check European values in DiscoverEU applications - short motivation to prove you want the ticket to grow and learn, rather than random draw

For DiscoverEU Inclusion Action broaden the age limit to allow more people to attend, even in groups that might be diverse in term of age; the name is discouraging

The programme is managed in a way that it creates a common standard and also inspires the national level.

Well being, methal health, sense of belonging, non-discrimination are focusses for the future.

Digital literacy could be more supported in the programme, the questions arises if this is the right programme for it, it requiers a specialised approach.

Youth projects/activities and organisations have a direct link with participation, and place themselves in the centre of the programme next to young people.

There is a need to Strenghten actions that support participation and democracy