Paraphrase đề.

Nêu quan điểm: đồng ý một phần có lợi nhưng nên giới hạn

B2: thân vài

Body 1 Lợi ích của miễn học phí

Cơ hội học tập cho sinh viên nghèo nên giảm bất bình đẳng.

Tăng số lượng lao động có trình độ nên phát triển kinh tế.

Sinh viên tập trung học tốt hơn vì không lo chi phí.

Body 2 một số hạn chế và rủi ro

Tạo gánh nặng ngân sách cho chính phủ.

Có thể ảnh hưởng đến các lĩnh vực công khác (y tế, giao thông...).

Một số sinh viên sẽ học không nghiêm túc nếu không có ràng buộc.

Giải pháp: miễn phí cho nhóm đối tượng cụ thể (học sinh nghèo, học giỏi).

B3: kết bài

Tóm tắt lợi  và hại.

Khẳng định lại quan điểm: không nên miễn phí hoàn toàn nên hỗ trợ có chọn lọc để công bằng và hiệu quả.

While I acknowledge that free education can reduce inequality and help more students pursue higher studies, I believe it might create financial burdens for governments and reduce students’ motivation to study hard.

Topic sentence: Some people believe university education should be free for all students

Reason 1: Equal opportunity for all students, regardless of background.

Reason 2: A more educated population benefits the economy and society.

Paragraph 2

Topic sentence: However, making university education completely free also has some drawbacks.

Reason 1: It creates a heavy financial burden on the government.

Reason 2: Paying tuition helps students become more responsible and motivated.

Conclusion:

Restate opinion: Free education has benefits but is not realistic for all.

Suggest solution: Governments should give scholarships or student loans instead.

-Topic sentences: on the one hand, it is understandable that some people believe that tertiary education should be free for all students.

-Reason:

+poor tanlent can access to higher education... => develop country

+improve people's knowledge

-example

Countries with high budget, high gpd, small population

*Body 2

Topic sentences: on the other hand, I firmly believe that tertiary education should not be free for all students.

-Reason:

+Free education => no motivation, no competition

+Free education => higher tax, poor to much budget on education => decrease budget on healthcare, ect

+Quantity increase => quality decrease

-Example:

Countries have low tuition cant afford...

Body 1:

On the one hand, opportunity will be promoted equally for all students.

Sp idea: students who are struggling financially still access university education.

Sp details: results: our country will have more highly educated workfore.

Body 2:

On the other hand, higher education should be free, but it is not for all students.

Sp idea 1 : Wealthy student don't need free education.

Sp details: when higher education is free for all students, it is not equal. Solution: tuition fees should be based on per capita income.

Sp idea 2: may reduce student’s motivation

Sp details: explanation : make students be more lazy and drop out.

• supporting ideas :

• Fistly, for professions that need to promote development, tuition support should be provided to students.

• Example, semiconductor technology industry , government and schools should support tuition for students to promote national development. balance for workforce . (chuyển thành argument cho Body 2)

• secondly, Students who have a passion for scientific research or have achieved many good achievements in contributing to society but whose conditions do not allow them to attend university. These students should be supported. (Đối tượng students được phân tích trong Reason 2 thì đang không tương thích với đối tượng chủ chốt trong Body 1 là "all students")

• result: equality in education university

  Body 2 :

• topic sentence: On the other hand , i am convinced that should only be free for a few students.

• supporting ideas : perhaps the foremost reason that can be part forward would be that there are students who do not need to be exempted from tuition, as well as the exemption of tuition for all students will in part affect the government budget.

• Example: lack of motivation for study

While free tuition offers benefits in terms of equity and reducing financial burden, I believe the disadvantages in terms of educational quality and unsustainable funding are more serious issues and should be considered as a priority.

Body1: Agree(40%) - Recognize the benefits)

Main topic: Free tuition is a socially valuable policy that reduces the financial burden on families and creates equal opportunities.

Idea:

Reduces economic pressure: Helps parents feel secure and not have to worry about huge tuition fees.

Social equality: Ensures that talented students, regardless of background, can pursue higher education.

Body2 (60%) - Eduation Quality

Main topic: Total dependence on the state budget will negatively affect teachers' salaries and teaching quality. (This is the point you want to emphasize.)

Idea:

Loss of main source of income: Without tuition fees, universities will lack flexible financial resources.

Limited dependence on the state budget: Expenditures such as professors' and lecturers' salaries will be tightened and carefully considered.

Difficulty retaining talent: Unattractive salaries will make it difficult for schools to attract and retain good, experienced professors, leading to a decline in the overall quality of education.

Waste of resources: Students may not value a free education (due to a “gift” mentality), leading to higher dropout rates or not taking their education seriously.

Tax burden: This huge cost will be passed on to taxpayers, including those who have never and will never go to college. This can be an unfair allocation of resources.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that students who go to university should receive a tuition waiver. The key rationale in favor of this notion is that this decision would help to promote hard work. In many countries, university tuition is quite expensive. That is why the government often provides students with low-interest loans, which help them to pay the fees and living expenses. However, when graduating, students must pay both the loan amount and accrued interest. This sometimes becomes a burden for students, which makes them feel exhausted and depressed. As a result, more and more students choose not to attend university but instead look for a job. However, these jobs often require hard physical labor and offer low salaries; for example, being a worker, a farmer, or a mechanic. Nowadays, most good jobs require a higher education. That means people who do not attend university have a lower chance of receiving a good position, and their lives are difficult to improve.

On the other hand, I am convinced that university education should be free for only some students, not for all students.Firstly, the university fee can act as a filter that separates those who are hardworking from those who aren't. If university education is free, then every student will try to enroll, even though some of them will end up wasting four years there for nothing. Conversely, the university fee can prevent those less serious students from wasting limited educational resources.Secondly, there are students who come from wealthy families, so they can easily pay the fees. This money can, in turn, help encourage poorer students through scholarships. As a consequence, we can reasonably use educational resources while still encouraging students to study harder.

In conclusion, while there are reasons that higher education should be free for all students, i would argue that the university’s fee is necessary.