In the economical  aspect,  if we prevent the separation of Panama, we can take advantage of Panama’s Canal and turn it into important commercial and trading routes, implement and conserve railways which will mean an important growth in Colombia’s economy.
And in the social aspect, Colombia could improve the quality of life of their citizens thanks to the new economy and the territory that was obtained from Panama they can have better infrastructure, more resources and raw materials, and taxes will be reduced thanks to agricultural and industrial income.

2) The serious economic crisis that the territories of South America were going through after their independence processes, wars and new governments.

3) The lack of communication between the member territories of “La Gran Colombia”, caused by the great territorial extension that it covered.

4) The absence of Simón Bolívar in the power, who was liberating other territories in South America.

We believe that one of the biggest mistakes at the time of the creation of "La Gran Colombia" was that Simon Bolivar, not being able to exercise the position correctly, decided to leave Francisco de Paula Santander in charge, who although he was fighting for the freedom of the region , did not share the ideals of centralism, causing a difference of opinions with Bolivar, which was increasing over the years, until a point was reached in which a new civil war was generated, so we consider that if Bolivar had exercised the position of president correctly or had left in charge a man who was a supporter of centralism, the division between the members of the government would have been less.

In addition, we believe that if the leaders of both positions (centralists and federalists) had taken the time to establish negotiating tables, in order to create a just and equitable constitution in every sense of the word, where the presence of of the state in all its territory without exceptions, allocating resources to progress, the power struggle would not have occurred.

We believe that if this project had had better planning and execution, many of the current problems in the Latin American region would not be happening. For example, poverty rates would be much lower, since being a "country" of this magnitude would have a very strong industrial sector with a large network of imports, having two oceanic borders (Atlantic and Pacific), expanding commercialization of national products, especially in the oil and coffee sector. Likewise, the political disagreement of society would be much less, since we would be one of the most important powers in the world, alongside countries such as the USA and Russia, being able to take sides in transcendental situations for the development of humanity.

 This is because humans, not only Colombia’s ,since the ancient times pre-civilization are selfish, and also the humans are very critical with other people, but they are not always self-critical with their beliefs, ideas, and actions. Coming back with seeing another present by changing past, is we still go more far away in history we can go in the greece war with persia, if Persia had won, the occidental culture will had been very different, but could really be better, the Persias where artist and mathematics, they although their religion they accept science, seeing it as a tool that they received by god, the greece art would not disappear, the art in this time in greece was very powerful, so continuing the parallel future, in europe things would be very different, the catholic church could also made symbiosis with the beliefs of persia, this making in europe a world more secular, making science and other laic thinkings. 

This instead of a cruel discovery of America would produce a more comprehensive understanding about tribal culture, and instead of the destruction and the stealing of resources that America had. Also the independence could had a different ending, because in the original history, spanish government was very rough with all the natives, with the new spanish kingdom with persian culture they will accept more the differences between people, they will make prevail some benefits of the land, but they could be more assertive with it. With this say if the ideals of independence born in some way, it would become united, because without a universal law, that was the church imposing a law inspired on the good things of europe, I not saying that the catholic church not exit, because as before, I told about a symbiosis of cultures, some ways of thinking could be much more different than the real history, accepting science and critics of the religion. So returning to the possible independence the two possible groups could have an spirit of union and will not be as selfish as in reality, then the independence is signed and we are a nation, the Patria Boba will not exist and then the conservatives and liberals could not be so radical in their opinion, and the hegemonies will not be interpreted as something bad for the other party, the separation of panama also will not exist because of that, also the bogotazo will not occur because in this new perspective we will have, the assassination will occur, but pour reality will be different.