1. Art is the enjoyment of forms. (Ernst Cassirer)

2. Art is an expression; it is not intention or talent.

There are a lot of Art forms, among all of the options I get to choose, I chose this Ballet Performance presented by The Royal Ballet starring Marianela Nuñez and Carlos Acosta.

This specific ballet performance presents the two definitions: first, it is visible how much they enjoy performing given all the costumes, theme, the set up, and most importantly, the way they are expressing the emotions of the performance. With these emotions, this is where "Art is an expression; it is not intention or talent" comes to place.

The emotions of the performance is not the only thing expressed in here as well as the story this performance is unfolding as they are using several art forms (costume designs, musical, performance) as a subject of expressing. The usage of these art forms were used perfectly to tell the story this performance has to share.

This whole performance screams mastery and perfect form of art--as I personally define it.

If art is defined as representation, does it take to account the art forms like instrumental music or so-called abstract art, like the painting below by Kandinsky

Every form of art represents something as any artistic materials originated from a proper and thorough planning of concepts and how this will be expressed and represented. Just like in music. The tones, notes, and melodies are planned and created to represent something; as obvious as it is, different genre of music shows dissimilar melodies and vibes. Slow and melodic music represents melancholy, brokenness. However, the genre of music which contains a very loud melodies usually portrays happiness. One of the limitation of this concept is, sometimes, you cannot vary the expressions as some uses 'inappropriate' melody from the lyrics.

Another example of art as an representation is Philippine Festivals. Festivals here in the Philippines is one of the grown traditions we have. In festivals, performance and musical are always present. The music and the performance are representation of a specific form, in which symbolizes the way people live all throughout the years.

Art is a very broad field of our life. Despite of the discrete qualities of instruments and music, as an artist, it is easy to identify and personally define how a specific art portrays and represent a form of life.

If art is defined within the ambits of "aesthethics", whether as "aesthetic object" or "aesthetic experience", how it is viewed from this perspective?

As a youth and apart of the new generation, that is surrounded by "aesthetics", I believe that art is viewed in a way that any art forms should meet the criteria of being aesthetic. In a sense that this form should be in a 'aesthetic' color (usually in neutral colors) and is able to hop in trends.

This can be applied to the present art tastes. Aesthetic-ness of an art, let's say clothes, is defined certainly when it is timely and this definition tends to sway away when the timelessness of an art form comes to an end; and that is the limitation of this concept.

In my opinion, art itself does not have to meet the standards or criteria of aesthetic-ness and how art is defined simply because art can define itself; no judgement and specific qualifications from whoever and anywhere.

Later on, upon researching, I learned that this image expressionism depict 'fear' because of a personal experience; it embodies the artist's profound and individualized experience of existential dread. The distorted figure, the swirling lines, and the unsettling colors serve not just as symbols, but as the very articulation of Edward Munch's internal emotions.

"The Scream" is likely engaged in the Collingwood's aesthetic process of clarifying his own anxieties, transforming a vague, overwhelming feeling into a tangible, comprehensible form. This act of expression, rather than simply releasing emotion, it connects with the raw emotional intensity of the work. "The Scream" serves as a powerful testament to Collingwood's assertion that art is not merely a representation of emotion, but a process of making emotion conscious and intelligible.

The bleeding clouds in the sky represents the psychological bleeding pain of love discussed in the poem; the sun, however, represents the vibrancy of the existing love which guides the subject to an ending path. The red spider lillies (flowers) symbolize death (usually in Japan and China), but in my collage of visualization, I used it to signify the dead love. Lastly, the vinyl represents how this poem sounds like a vinyl music based on its vibe, and the way it is presented.

Lopez firmly believes art is inherently connected to society. He contends that even when artists aim for purely aesthetic expression, their work inevitably mirrors the social environment and prevailing conditions. Therefore, the notion of art existing independently is an illusion, as it perpetually reflects the artist's interaction with their world.

2) Why is it detrimental to believe that art is a form of escape?

Lopez critiques the idea of art as a mere escape, deeming it detrimental. He argues that this perspective allows artists to disengage from pressing social issues, leading to a decline in their work's relevance. By treating art as a refuge, artists risk becoming isolated and failing to contribute meaningfully to the betterment of society, which is a missed opportunity for impactful change.

3) Why is it important for art to address the "problems of [the artist's name] time"?

Lopez passionately advocates for art that directly confronts the "problems of [the artist's] time." He believes artists have a moral obligation to utilize their creative abilities to address social injustices and challenges. By engaging with these issues, art can raise public awareness, stimulate critical thought, and mobilize individuals towards positive action, thereby serving as a catalyst for societal progress.

4) What does Lopez mean when he said that rioters and artists should be "teachers of men"?

Lopez envisions writers and artists as "teachers of men," guiding society towards self-understanding. He asserts that artists possess a unique capacity to illuminate social realities and expose injustices, inspiring individuals to strive for a better future. This "teaching" is not about direct instruction, but rather about fostering critical thinking, empathy, and a profound sense of social responsibility through their artistic expression.

5) Why does Lopez think that the highest form of art is emancipatory?

Lopez champions "emancipatory art" as the pinnacle of artistic achievement. He defines it as art that liberates individuals and society from oppression, ignorance, and prejudice, empowering them to question the status quo. This form of art fosters critical consciousness and inspires collective action towards a more just and equitable world, making it a powerful tool for social transformation.

These are the ideologies that I noticed to the last and my favorite episode:

1) Education - The main brain o the heist called with an alies 'Professor' uses his knowledge, intelligence, and logical reasoning to make the heist work.

2) Media - In Money Heist, th characters (the robbers) were using devices (phones, laptops) to hack the system for them to live stream the happenings inside the Bank of Spain ad share 'crucial information' regarding their plans that they uses to twist the mind of the authorities. With this, the medial played a role to make their plans work and to gather support from the outside people.

3) Family - In spite of the fact that they are criminals and commits mmoral acts, through the movie, the characters formed a family as they also name it. They started off as colleages but eventually grew with each other's company which is seen in the last episode as well as they caress and how happy they were to see each other after the seriousness f the threats for their life they faced.

Rewatching the La Casa de Papel finale with a critical eye reveals a complex ideological tapestry. Initially, the emotional highs and triumphant conclusion mask deeper messages. The series champions an anti-establishment ideology, portraying the gang as morally superior rebels against a corrupt state. Their successful escape and public support reinforce the idea that illegal actions are justified against oppression. Individual agency is also paramount, with characters defying norms to control their destinies. However, this focus oversimplifies complex societal issues. The show, while critiquing capitalism, remains a product of it, creating tension between its subversive message and commercial success.

The final episode becomes a battleground of ideologies. It uses Althusser's ISAs to challenge dominant narratives, with the gang manipulating media and public perception. Yet, the state, though portrayed as corrupt, retains power, making the gang's victory largely symbolic. The series reveals the limitations of such challenges, showcasing the state's enduring influence despite the gang's apparent triumph. The show's narrative, while promoting rebellion, ultimately exists within the confines of commercial entertainment. This tension between subversive messaging and its role as a mass-produced spectacle is crucial to understanding its ideological impact.

The poem is like a letter, which indicates an ideology of friendship/relationship; telling Pete how their town changed while he was gone. With the ideology focusing on government, it shows how much power the local leaders have over everything. Farming and basic needs (ideology of agriculture/basic commodities) are important to the town-- as a rural community.

People's values are changing, like Pete's cousin wanting fancy things (ideology of culture). The poem shows how the town is being ignored and how hard life is for the people there (neglect of rural community). Lastly, some people are changing their names to sound more American, showing they think those names are better; hence, indication of ideology of colonial mentality.

I've always had the thought of: what could've happen if I chose to study what I really wanted, would I have a life?

What if I chose to have a buhay than to have kabuhayan?

This collage self-portrait is colorful; a pop art. This symbolizes how much colors and sparkles I want in my life, but somehow, I only see the possibility of having a colorful life when I, sana, chose the path I really want to take which is fashion technology.

Sana, katulad ng iba, pasyon na lang ang kailangan kong isipin--without the thought and doubt of pursuing my actual dream. Sana, money was really not a problem.

I have two answers to this question; first, alternating an art work based on your artistic capability and expression, it can be considered a new form of art. In my case, I put curly hair, modern fake lashes, and dark lipstick color— which represents the way I vision her visual if the muse of the painting exist in this modern world. However, alternating an art work disrespect the originality of the painting and a disrespect to the painter itself.

2. How do the concepts of "originality" and piracy affect the way we receive works of art?

The ideas of creating something new and copying it without permission greatly affect how we see art. When we think art is original, made by one person with their own ideas, we often value it more. We look for the artist's unique touch and how it fits into art history. Knowing it's original can also make the artwork feel more meaningful. However, when art is copied and shared without permission (piracy), it can make the original seem less special and worth less money. While piracy can let more people see the art, it also makes it harder for artists to earn a living, which can affect how much new art gets made. So, how we understand and appreciate art is constantly influenced by this push and pull between wanting something unique and the ease of making copies.